Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God Analysis

Improved Essays
How does one know if they are a moral person? Do they have to be a born again believer of Jesus Christ and follow the rules of the church to in order to be a moral person? There are some early American writing’s would have one to believe that they must be saved in order to be moral.

The word moral has several definitions. According to Webster’s dictionary, moral means “relating to duty or obligation; pertaining to those intentions and actions of which right and wrong, virtue and vice, are predicated, or to the rules by which such intentions and actions ought to be directed.” Another definition says, “Conformed to accepted rules of right; acting in conformity with such rules; virtuous; just; as, a moral man.” From these definitions we can possibly conclude that all you have to do is “do the right thing” in order to be a moral person or you can conform to acceptable rules of right, such as the rules of the church, in order to be a moral person.
…show more content…
He says, “Unconverted men walk over the pit of hell on a rotten covering, and there are innumerable places in this covering so weak that they will not bear their weight, and these places are not seen.” He is saying that sinners who have not turned their life over to God can find themselves falling into sin more and on their way to hell. He also tries to persuade them by saying, “Thus it is that natural men are held in the hand of God, over the pit of hell; they have deserved the fiery pit, and are already sentenced to it;” This simply means that God already has the sinner, the one who isn’t born again, in his hands ready to send them to hell because they will not repent and come to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    “We find it easy to tread on and crush a Worm that we see crawling on the Earth; so ’tis easy for us to cut or singe a slender Thread that any Thing hangs by; thus easy is it for God when he pleases to cast his Enemies down to Hell,” (Edwards 5). In this context, Jonathan Edwards, a minister who wrote Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, is putting a fiery image into the minds of the Puritans who attended his sermon on the day of July 8th, 1741. At the time of the Great Awakening, there was a loss of faith directly related to the widespread use of science and theories. Edwards uses a fear-inducing tone to refuel a fire in the believers and turn them back into the arms of God. By using intense metaphors and other rhetorical devices, such as…

    • 1423 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In quotation number 3, Johnathan Edwards explains his ideas through [Sinners In the Hands of an Angry God]. What he is explaining is that godś bow is always on you no matter inocent or guilty. He is always watchinhg, ready to strike at any mistake. To ensure that juctice pervails he is ready to ¨shoot¨ his arrow at any sinner. Johnathan edwards explains how strong godś wrath is ¨but the meer Pleasure of God, and that of an angry god, without any promise or obligation at all that¨ (Edwards).…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” During the Great Awakening, Johnathan Edwards rose greatly in popularity due to his powerful and menacing sermons that shook audiences and provided new views on the Christian religion. His most famous sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” expresses his belief that God is spiteful and full of rage, and will condemn any sinners to an eternal torture in hell. He depicts God as solely torturous and wanting only to punish those who have done wrong, thus appealing to fear and providing motivation to escape the wraths of God’s persecution by finding new faith in Christianity. This method of focusing on punishment and then subsequent ways to escape it while inciting fear is unnecessary and wrong in its…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout The Prince, Machiavelli represents what a person should be. The arguments Machiavelli possesses throughout the book can be questioned, but the intent is still there. Machiavelli does not specifically state whether Christian ethics should be followed but rather what one person should possess to survive. Personally, I agree with Machiavelli’s theory. One should be entitled to whatever religion or morals they would like to follow.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality. What is morality? Webster dictionary defines it as beliefs of what is right behavior and what is wrong behavior. In the dictionary, the definition is succinct and comprehensible because a majority understand society’s definition of what is right or wrong. But there isn’t always a fine line between what is good or bad because life isn’t always so fixed and predictable.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality itself is a widely debated topic. Some argue it is a measure of one’s purity, others consider it is a system of principles widely accepted by a group or society. Whatever someone believes, another question arises- what makes a person morally right or morally wrong? Intentions may be in the right place, however, if the event does not turn out to be as extraordinary as planned, many think the original intention does not overpower the fact that the intention did not play out. Still, others disagree, claiming that the intention is what really counts.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Oh no! BIlly got mugged in a dark and spooky alley but he said it’s immoral to hurt anyone or anything. Now he lost his money and his identity, only if he head defended himself,, this wouldn’t have happened. Morality means: principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior. I think that at times you should abandon your morals so you can get stuff done.…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality can be defined as the principles that govern good behavior. From the novel “Riveted” by Jim Davies (Davies, 2014), we learn about how religion helps defines people’s conduct. We also subsequently learn that religious people find it perplexing as to how atheists could have any morality at all. The tendency for the religious person to belief that anyone cannot be a moral agent without religion would be my target example. What the target example may overlook is the fact that morality is something innate in everybody and one does not necessary have to be religious to be have good morals.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What it means to have Integrity The basic definition of integrity, consists of having strong morals, honesty, and being complete or whole, but what does integrity truly mean? It typically depends on the type of person and their opinions; some might think that being completely honest makes a person have integrity, or that having great ambitions counts. Morals are classified as having strong beliefs, but this greatly depends on the person; someone might think that executing a criminal is fine, or that a man should not hurt a woman. Goals are also a part of morals, they are what make us do things; like how we work to have a vacation, or how another person would go to school to graduate later.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality is a particular system of values and principles of conduct held by one person or society. Each person has their own set of morals, and they can be influenced by things such as culture or other people. There is no universally right moral value system, and as far as morals go, there is no right or wrong. In The Book Thief by Markus Zusak, a man named Adolf Hitler persuaded the citizens of Germany that jewish people were a threat to their society. Adolf Hitler took control over Germany and established his Nazi government.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the dictionary morality is defined as the disjunction between right and wrong (Morality). While that is the dictionaries definition, truly defining morality depends on in which philosophical way moral dilemmas are approached. In consequentialism, morality is defined as an act or omission from acting that will produce a good outcome, or consequence. It can be summed up by using the old saying "the ends justify the means" (Singer) . In deontology morality is judged based on the act or action's adherence to a rule or set of rules.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans have the power to decide if an action is wrong or right. What differentiates people are their morals and ethics. It makes a big difference when we, as humans choose what is right in our eyes and proceed to act. Morals are what shapes us as individuals and what makes us unique in a certain way. The moral principle to any situation would be to do the right thing above all.…

    • 2323 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It differs in that ethics is the philosophical and scientific study of the moral and theoretical while morality is practical. Ethics is about right and depends on the philosophy and moral change is the behavior that is our life. Etymologically "ethical" and "moral" have the same meaning. "Moral" comes from Latin "mos" which means habit or custom; and "ethics" from the Greek "ethos" which means the same.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In life morals are self defining laws, they tell us what is right and what is wrong. They indicate wether or not to go through with a thought or to let that thought drift away. Morals indicate wether or not that though in itself is even right. But what is right? We define right as the correct way of doing something, and is the correct way of being.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Morality is behaving in a good or right way. Humans should be moral due to their sociological, psychological, and theological ideas that affect how they behave and is what allows them to thrive as a species and as an individual. When a person acts in a moral way, it benefits themselves and their societies through their survival, happiness, consciousness, reputation, and afterlives. Thus, when humans behave in an immoral way it decreases the overall effect that being moral deals with. This is why the immoral behavior is punished, as a way to help society and the ways it interacts with each other.…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays