Single Member District Vs Proportional Representation

Decent Essays
Hamza Jeter
4/28/17
Professor Roxas
Political Science

Single Member District Vs Proportional Representation

The two most popular and most used types of voting systems are single member districts and proportional representation. A single member district is a voting system with a predetermined constituency that elects a single individual to some place in office. A proportional representation is a voting system used to elect an assembly or group of people. The clear difference between the two systems is that a single member district allows an electoral district with only one seat while proportional representation allows for multimember districts and seats in the district are awarded proportionally. However, there are certain characteristics
…show more content…
In this system, they attempt to decrease the number of votes wasted by increasing the number of parties there are in the legislature. Since the proportional representation relies on more than one legislative seat in each district, it allows for the amount of votes wasted to decrease. In this system, the voters cast their ballot for a party and not a single candidate. The percentage of votes a party receives will determine how many of the districts seats the part will end up gaining. Another difference between the two systems is that proportional representation is based on multi- member districts, so it creates elections that are not centered on competition between individuals. It is also noted that proportional systems have more party discipline and ideology than single member districts. For example, proportional representation has a diversity of parties and they carve out distinct ideological spaces as single member districts do not. Single member districts choose to get as many people as possible in order to win majority of votes. Also proportional systems tend to have more disciplined parties since those who do not follow the rules end up being dropped from the party list in the elections to

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The New Jersey Plan Essay

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1) What type of representation did the New Jersey Plan call for? The type of representation the New Jersey Plan call for is the “equal representation” where even though the population of each states are different, they will still have the same number of representatives for their state. A federal government with only one legislative body which was based on the idea of equal representation that is having two senators despite the size of the state and its population. 2)…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The larger more populous states wanted a senate based on population, the smaller populated states objected because they would be outnumbered. So both sides compromised and made the House of Representatives by population and the Senate everyone has 2 representatives together these two bodies make up Congress. 9. 15. Malapportionment describes a distribution of representatives…

    • 272 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, gerrymandering does not make the election more competitive because if there are more states where party A rules in the legislature, even if there are more votes for party B, party A will still become the victor. Gerrymandering also makes elections unfair and inaccurate. This is true because according to billmoyers.com, when the government gerrymanders, the outcomes don’t match the votes, the politicians are choosing instead of the people, and gerrymandering also causes more extremism. Because of all these effects of gerrymandering, it shows how unfair gerrymandering is seeing as the majority vote can be counted unfairly and cause the election to become more heated and extreme instead of…

    • 1015 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The linkage groups like interest groups and political parties are vital to keeping the citizens informed and involved. A two-party system may seem to be not the most effective way to run a government. But, there are many advantages to having political parties. By having a two-party system, citizens interests and opinions are balanced.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As this alternative considers the votes of all persons voting, it elects whichever candidate has the most votes overall. This system clearly elucidates any misconstruction of its democratic status, unlike the Electoral College, which fails to do so. The Popular Vote would eradicate this trivial standpoint that most states hold and evolve it into that of equal ability as these “swing” states have. One could also describe this change as a leveling of the playing field. Washington Post (2013) predicts, “This system applied nationally would give Republicans a built-in advantage because it would dilute the influence of highly concentrated urban voters, who tend to vote Democratic in large numbers.”…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This may occur to to the addition or loss of representative(s). Each district has to have equal population, must be connected, and must be compact. Politicians may gerrymander to keep an incumbent in power. They change district lines to ensure that the majority of voters in the district will support the incumbent.…

    • 219 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The three government systems majority, coalition and minority all have their own limitations and benefits. A majority system is a single party where only one member is elected out of a constituency; [a specified area of voters who elect a person to represent them legislatively] the most adequate person should be elected to represent the constituency. This system is very common and they can do what they want to. It is easier to pass bills and do not have to worry about the opposition. The minority system consist of many different parties where that one party does not have more than 50% of the power.…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With packed districts, candidates do not need to appeal to members of both parties to win office, so they are able to take their views to an extreme in order to appeal to the more extreme members of their…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Electoral College Dilemma Premise: The U.S. Electoral College voting system needs to be improved upon because whoever earns the majority of total votes cast should be the winner. Definitions: Electoral College-…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In Canada

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The move to actualize some type of electoral change is politically divisive. Since change stands to influence the quantity of seats each party wins in an election, the move to some system can seemingly profit at least one parties above others. Now and again, proposition have surfaced for changes to Canada's electoral system. More often than not, these include some variation of proportional representation, albeit some have contended for a particular ballot to guarantee that applicants chose have the support of a larger part of voters. At the government level, these have dependably been rejected.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This system would be very different from the Electoral College system, being that it would wipe away the middle man between the people and the government. In this system, the people would cast their votes in a ranking system, ranking who they wanted at the top and their least favorite candidate last. This system gives the people a feel of importance when casting their vote because they know it will make a difference. If Americans changed the system to Direct Vote with Plurality rule, this would make Americans especially feel like each and everyone of their votes counted.…

    • 461 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Through elections and the democratic process, citizens get the chance to grant authority to individuals to represent them and their interests because of this, elections and the electoral process are the cornerstones of democracy. Fair and representative elections encourage the exchange of ideas and opinions and are crucial in establishing a relationship between the government and the citizens they represent. Since elections have and will continue to be the most vital aspect of democracy, the procedural steps of elections and the formula for electing representatives will also be important. Around the world, there are different types of electoral systems. Along with these systems come debate about if these electoral systems lead to governments that truly represent the values of the population.…

    • 1759 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (History Central) Second is that any other system would be just as flawed as the Electoral College. This is expressed through the District method and the Proportional voting system as stated previously. The greatest faults in those two systems is that with the District method.. The most concerning flaw with Proportional voting is that smaller populated states would have virtually no power to the election outcome when compared to their larger more populated states counterparts.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First-Past-The-Post system (FPTP) is currently used to elect representatives to the House of Commons. It is true that FPTP is an efficient and simple way of voting that has been trusted for years. Nevertheless, FPTP discriminates against minority parties and leads to non-accurate election results. The large amount of wasted votes is also a major criticism associated with the FPTP system. Recently, the Alternative Vote System is recognized as a way to increase fairness and improve election results.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Most important, one does not have to worry about their citizens education in a certain field compared to a direct democracy. Thus reducing the possibility of citizens voting of laws that will cause harm in the future. To quote President Bush, “Think about every problem, every challenge, we face. The solution to each starts with…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays