Single-Issue Movement Analysis

There are approaches that go beyond the framework of the NSMs, mainly by saying that there are even newer formations of movements. Much of this idea comes from the fact that NSM theory does not actually encompass all modern social movements (Day 722) and yet is the predominant theory for the categorizing modern movements. This idea of an alternative framework for modern social movements that was produced by from Richard Day. He laid out the problems with the NSM theory such as how most NSMs are defined as being single-issue movements. The main problem that he saw with only single-issue movements being classified as NSMs is that there are movements who predominately focus on one issue, but are connected to other issues (Day 723). He cites some feminist movements as they discussed issues of capitalism as well (Day 723). The EZLN would also be an example of this as chief concerns of the EZLN in their second phase were indigenous rights which they linked to such topics as the economy and gender relations. Even, the changing nature of the EZLN supports Day’s idea that the NSM paradigm has flaws.
Indigenous Movements …show more content…
According to Deborah Yashar, these indigenous organizations have two main factors which include challenging the state and being propelled by political liberalization. Both of these components are present in the EZLN. She writes, “The EZLN’s agenda includes indigenous autonomy and cultural respect alongside democratization” (Yashar p. 24, 1998). The liberalization of the political realm is important because it creates an opening for movements such as the EZLN to take action. Without the liberalization, these indigenous groups would have a more difficult time forming and sustaining. The negative effects that liberalization brought to Mexico’s rural and indigenous populations allowed the EZLN to gain support for their