Singer Giving Away All Of Our Luxuries Analysis

Improved Essays
While Singer’s solution giving away all of our luxuries, it is unattainable for most people because of how large of a role luxuries play in our lives. While it is definitely true that we should be taking away more money from our luxuries in order to support people who are in need, completely eliminating all of our luxuries to the vast extent that Singer suggests isn’t practical because it would force us to lose our identities. For example, eliminating all of luxuries would mean that we end our support for a lot of our culture. Cultural creations, such as music, literature, and film can be considered as luxuries since they aren’t essential in order for us to function. Despite the fact that we use these pieces of culture to define ourselves,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Poverty

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” Peter Singer is trying to persuade the society that the world hunger and poverty will be solved if people from wealthy society donate the money that spend on their luxuries to the aid organization. He gives two controversies examples of Dora’s situation and Bob’s situation which help to strengthen his argument. From that examples it is also supports his arguments in favor of his altruistic position. On the other hand he also address the objections to his arguments which is “fair share” and “the limit of the donation.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What duty do we have to help those who might otherwise starve without our intervention? Is it our responsibility to help our fellow man in need or are we free to stand on the sidelines? Philosophers Jan Narveson and Peter Singer offer contrasting viewpoints on the moral obligations affluent nations have to aid and support the poor. Where Singer reasons that by having the privilege of living in nations of wealth, this benefit carries with it the moral obligation to help those around the world who are sentenced to live in absolute poverty, if only because of where fate had them born. In response, Narveson argues Singer is mistaken: our responsibility and duty first lies to our circle and we should never insist that others take the responsibility…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thus, the materialistic culture developed today is also gauging the way in which future generations are prospering; undeniably, the affluent are excelling and the minorities tend to be falling behind. This division is fostering the very oppressive nature that threatens the common…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They have made up an imaginary class that is made up of materialistic people. He introduces the “yuppies” in the 1980’s as, “Amid a declining standard of living for many, these young professionals- many of whom are employed by the new ‘information industries’- scramble to surround themselves with the ever changing ‘latest’ in designer clothing, consumer electronics, and other commodified symbols of the good life” (196). He is basically saying that people were buying items to be a part of the “dream.” Authors R. Wilburn Clouse, Terry Goodin, Joseph Aniello, Charles Stowe, and Noel McDowell also disagree with the American dream, but extend on how the American dream has changed.…

    • 1617 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Homeless, Mike Dick Was 51, Looked 66,” author Kevin Fagan stated that “The nation needs to commit, emotionally and economically, to saving these older folks” (321.) The older folks referred to in the article are homeless people that live across the United States. Fagan maintained that the nation can do better in terms giving back to the needy, especially considering the wealthy of the nation. However, what Fagan failed to mention in the article is what the homeless are not doing for themselves. Long time homelessness is a predicament that can only be blamed on the homeless because people that wind up homeless for whatever reasons are capable of changing their situation.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In a society where “giving food to starving kids in Africa” has become almost a cliché, utilitarian philosopher Peter Singer makes the readers of The New York Times step back and reevaluate their spending choices in his 1999 essay “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”. Through a mixture of examples and facts Singer calls upon those with excess money, typically used on luxuries, to instead donate that money for overseas aid agencies. In order to persuade the reader to follow through with his solution, he utilizes anecdotes and facts, emotional statements, and an impression to communicate the importance of donating to these agencies. At the start of the article, Singer opens with an anecdote from the movie “Central Station”.…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The measure of our value is based on material things. Because of this belief that society has engraved in our brains, we all wait for the next best thing to come around. The only thing we want to do is consume, consume, consume. And we don’t consume based on need; we consume because that’s what everyone else is doing.…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer’s essay “What Should a Billionaire Give” discusses the harsh truth of global poverty that many individuals suffer through due to living in a developing country. In his essay, he tells the story of Bill and Melinda Gates making the decision to take it upon themselves and donate to those in need via the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. For any human, it is his or her civic obligation to care about the needs of others, whether the needs are physiological or based on safety. In order to provide for the basic needs of the poor, it is vital to understand how individuals respond to poverty, how war affects poverty, and how poverty can be related to psychology.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Famine. Affluence, and Morality outlined the greater moral evil rule. It basically means we should do everything in our power to stop anything bad from happening without harming anything with moral importance. If we were to take this idea to the highest instinct, we would be giving everything we have away until we are like the ones we are giving to. He knew that most people would not live by this so, he created a more moderate approach.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Everyday millions of people around the world suffer in circumstances, in which they could die from lack of proper care and resources. In Famine, Affluence, and Morality, Peter Singer acknowledges this issue facing humanity and argues for the moral obligation to give large amounts of money to those in need. Singer believes that all who are able should be giving up many, if not all of their luxuries to help give the less fortunate their necessities. I will begin by summarizing the argument that Singer dictates in his article and then explain my reasoning for believing his notions to be sound and valid.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is driven by the idea of opportunities and finding a pathway to economic success. This ideal brings more people to America with hopes to become the next Steve Jobs or CEO of a major economic empire. The plan that Singer is suggesting would take away all luxuries that are benifits of being at the top of the economic food chain. Taking away the rewards of working hard and climbing up the economic empire would engineer a new phase of complacent people. Without economic rewards, most people are discouraged to invest their time in the economy, which would make a poor American economy and global economy.…

    • 1058 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Singer does not take into account the proximity of how close people in need are He also does not take into account one’s own self interest or comfort. People do not have to be in our society for us to be obligated to help them. The starving child in Africa is just as much as our responsibility as the inner city kids in Richmond. He states that we ought to give as much as possible even to the point of it causing us and our dependents some suffering.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He writes, “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (Singer 6). He stresses that affluent societies have no excuse to not treat ailments we have the cure for, like starvation. Alleviating these poor conditions and human suffering is the easiest way to minimize the sum total of pain, or to follow the Greatest Happiness Principle. Singer expands on how much people are expected to give and mentions the “point of marginal utility” (10). The point of marginal utility as it relates to money essentially means that after a certain point where an individual can live comfortably, any extra income will not make the individual significantly happier.…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Peter Singer Argument

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The argument to which Singer lays his claim would be pragmatic in an idealistic world. However, this world in which human existence thrives is far from being in a state that is unimpeded by flaws. Singer argues that those who earn enough to spend their extra money on luxuries should instead donate those funds to overseas organizations to help combat poverty. This proposal is unrealistic due to reasons that you can’t expect beings who carry faultful qualities to amend their ways without delay. Many individuals who have become accustomed to living an affluent lifestyle, will feel reluctant towards Singer’s proposal due to the fear that it will jeopardize their comfortable way of life.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will reconstruct Singer’s argument as well as argue why his argument is unsound. In Singer’s paper, Famine, Affluence and Morality, he argues that any kind of suffering from lack of food, healthcare and shelter is a bad thing. He further argues that if we have the ability to prevent something bad from happening, that it is our duty as moral beings to prevent suffering unless we have to sacrifice something of significant moral importance. In class we called it the prevent suffering principle. An example that Singer gives is of the prevent suffering principle is to imagine a young child drowning in a shallow pond.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays