One of the major critical issues which world has been concerning for many years is the significant challenges of excessive consumption of tobacco and alcohol to public health and governments set targets to combat with this issue. Sin tax and some regulations on nicotine and alcohol have been implementing in order to have a reduction in drinking and smoking rates because of their negative impacts on people’s lives. While some people are in favour of extra levy and restrictions on cigarette and alcohol industries, there are some people who argue that it is an unfair process. This essay will discuss why high taxes and regulations exist on tobacco and alcohol and then will examine whether these processes are justified or not.
One of the major …show more content…
It could be said that majority of people are in favour of the ban since smokers are not only harming themselves and it might hinder some people to go out as they might be considerably sensitive towards tobacco’s smell and its chemicals. Consequently, people would go to a restaurant or coffee shops with their children without being in a smoke filled room. Furthermore, it is revealed that by the introduction of smoking free public places, the childhood asthma prevalence declined and raised the number of people who decreased their cigarette consumption or gave up smoking (ash, 2015). In addition, the smoke-free legislation led to reduction in emergency admissions to hospital for heart attacks by 2.4% which is equivalent to 1200 people in 12 months after the law legislated (ibid)
Nevertheless, some people argue that this legislation can not be justified as people still smoke in other places apart from public buildings, especially at home which have a significant impact on children’s health (Roxby, 2012). Additionally, some other further legislation could be required, since smoke-free legislation is efficient for only public places and it does not protect vulnerable children and other people considerably (ibid) as there are still 10 million people who are a regular smoker in the UK (Kellner,
One of the major …show more content…
It could be said that majority of people are in favour of the ban since smokers are not only harming themselves and it might hinder some people to go out as they might be considerably sensitive towards tobacco’s smell and its chemicals. Consequently, people would go to a restaurant or coffee shops with their children without being in a smoke filled room. Furthermore, it is revealed that by the introduction of smoking free public places, the childhood asthma prevalence declined and raised the number of people who decreased their cigarette consumption or gave up smoking (ash, 2015). In addition, the smoke-free legislation led to reduction in emergency admissions to hospital for heart attacks by 2.4% which is equivalent to 1200 people in 12 months after the law legislated (ibid)
Nevertheless, some people argue that this legislation can not be justified as people still smoke in other places apart from public buildings, especially at home which have a significant impact on children’s health (Roxby, 2012). Additionally, some other further legislation could be required, since smoke-free legislation is efficient for only public places and it does not protect vulnerable children and other people considerably (ibid) as there are still 10 million people who are a regular smoker in the UK (Kellner,