Simple Foreknowledge Vs. Calvinism

Superior Essays
Views Held
The Simple Foreknowledge view agrees with Calvinism that God knows everything, including the future and the events that will occur. Simple Foreknowledge and Calvinists hold differ in the explanation of how God foreknows all. Unlike Calvinism the Simple Foreknowledge view believes that God’s foreknowledge is not the result of divine foreknowledge. God knows the future and what humans will do, simply because it is there for him to know. This knowledge does not, however, give God the ability to change anything that will occur. Simple Foreknowledge claims that God’s foreknowledge is subject to change based on man’s existence, meaning if a person does not exist there is nothing for God to foreknow. God knows what man will do, simply,
…show more content…
God informs Abraham that he would become “the father of many nations” and would receive a vast land (Genesis 17:5-8 NIV). The completion of this prophecy depended on Abraham's free decision to trust and have faith in God. Many free decisions would lead to his descendants leaving egypt, because Moses freely chose to trust and obey God (Exodus 3:18-4:17 NIV). Nowhere in these passages indicate that God forced these decisions, in fact Moses and God argued for a bit before Moses freely chose to obey …show more content…
In Zechariah 12:10 (NIV) a prophecy about Christ says “when they look on the one whom they have pierced, they shall mourn for him.” This is clearly a reference to Christ's crucifixion, but this was foretold centuries before crucifixion was invented as a form of execution. Various times throughout the gospels Jesus predicts the future free actions of the people around him. Matthew 26:34 (NIV) Jesus says that Peter will deny him three times, sure enough Luke 22:57-61 (NIV) speaks of Paul’s three denials of Jesus. Similarly Jesus foretells of Judas Iscariot's betrayal of the Son of Man (John 6:64; 70-71; 13:18-19 NIV). Nowhere in these passages is there evidence that God predestined these decisions to be made, he simply knew the free decisions of the people. God loves all and allows for free will decisions, because he loves so much. 2 Peter 3:9 (NIV) demonstrates God’s desire that all, not just the ordained, people have a relationship with him, stating, He “is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance.” This idea is repeated multiple times throughout scripture (1 Timothy 2:4; John 12:32; John 16:8

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Calvinism, named for John Calvin and also called the Reformed christainty, is a theological system and an approach to the Christian life that emphasizes the God's sovereignty or control over all things. ( Calvinism believed that 3 three tests could determine your salvation: open profession of faith, a decent and godly life, and participation in the sacraments…

    • 57 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Calvin's Theodicy

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages

    When discussing evil and the existent of God the question “Is God a participant in this chaos?” comes up quite often. Theologians have different opinions about the answer to this question, but John Calvin has a stance on this idea of evil and God. John Calvin has clearly laid out his stance of perfect world theodicy in his writing of sdfjds,fh. Perfect world theodicy would agree that God is apart off all things in the world. His involvement would include the Creation, the Fall, everyday life, wickedness, and everything in between.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Christ also knew he would be killed on the cross and then resurrected. Both of them foresaw their death before it happened. Although seeing the future is Christ-like, another way in which Simon acts as Christ is…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He has seen everything, the past, the future and everything in between. Nothing comes as a surprise to him. Therefore we have no free will and every decision we make has been foreseen by God himself. “You insist that those things of the future are inevitable if God can see them, but you must admit that not even men can make inevitable those things that they see.” (171).…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A fact echoed by Job when speaking of God’s purposes, he says “no plans of yours can be thwarted” (Job…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, when Jean questions Mensor Williams, “‘Well, you’re a prescient. What does happen [in the future]?’” (Herbert 4), he replies with a most unusual answer - “‘Unfortunately, none of us are able to determine that’” (Herbert 4). In other words, if Williams is a prescient, then he should be proficient in foreseeing the future, unless he is hiding something that he does not want Jean to know.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jupiter says, “Romulus / Will take leadership, build walls of Mars / And call by his own name his people Romans” ( 3.371-73 the Aeneid). The Romans believed that Romulus founds Rome. In the Aeneid, the reader finds out about the prophecies in hindsight, after they actually happened. In other words, Virgil wrote about these prophecies at the time Rome already existed to explain the mythology behind the name. In the Bible King David makes a prophecy given to him by God about what will happen to Jesus, “They divide my clothes among them and cast lots for my garment” (Psalm 22:18 New International Version).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Rowe talks about the problem of Divine Foreknowledge and free will when he states, "Things occur not because God foreknows them; rather, he foreknows them because they occur" (Rowe, 150). Rowe perfectly explains how God has seen the future but has not pre-determined that the event will happen. God knows what happens because he is looking at every minute of time all at once. God to be totally all knowing and be the divine being that people believe that he is, God must know everything and understand what is going on at any given moment. God does not determine what will happen, humans decide what will happen, because of our free will.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explains God’s governing nature and man’s attitude and scope in the destiny of His own Divine will. Calvin’s hypothesis, though incomplete, believes that in God’s providence even the basic responses from man are called-on by God. “As the doctrine of creation exhibits God’s power, the doctrine of providence exhibits God’s grace.” God’s grace involves predestination, the special grace of the…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simple Foreknowledge and the idea of hard and soft facts, even though it is supposedly a “simple” view of God’s foreknowledge is a very hard view to understand. However, the middle knowledge, or Molinistic view tries to explain Gods foreknowledge through a belief in counterfactuals and three different types of knowledge that God has. A counterfactual is a conditional statement, or as explained by William Lane Craig, are statements that “are antecedent or consequent clauses [that] are typically contrary to the fact.” (Craig 120) Molinists believe that there are three types of knowledge possessed by God. These three types are…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Boethius's Analysis

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Therefore, God’s “foreknowledge” cannot be false, since everything that happens, even with freedom of choice, simply comes into his observation. Since “the truth of Providence observes in the present your ability to do this, and whether you are doing it, or in what direction you are changing it. So you cannot evade the divine foreknowledge, just as you cannot escape the gaze of a person’s eye which observes you at this moment, even though you vary your actions by use of your free will.” (Boethius,…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the theologians have many different ideas on free will they do both agree on the fact that God has the final say on whether someone gets into heaven, God is sovereign and that there is actually an…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Calvinism Vs Anabaptism

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Reformations that produced the Lutheran, Calvinist, Catholics, English and Anabaptists faiths was not only brought upon a change in doctrine, but also a change in the role of secular authority. Originally, it was the Roman Catholic Church, specifically the Pope, which controlled the lives of the people. However, Luther’s reform set the path for change. As people separated from the church, they developed the roles they believed the secular authorities should have in religious matters. In the Lutheran Reformation the church was subordinate to the state.…

    • 1979 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consistency that exists between the divine foreknowledge possessed by God and an individual’s ability to freely choose what they desire is an issue discussed by Augustine in his work Free choice of will bk. 3. Inherently, the ideals of divine foreknowledge and free choice of will are contradictory to one another as is it is impossible for an individual to possess free choice of will if the outcome that awaits the individual is known to God. Divine foreknowledge, which allows God the capacity to foresee the outcomes of an individual's choices prior to their actions, makes it impossible for an individual to act otherwise as God would also possess foreknowledge of their intent to do so. Therefore, an individual cannot be free.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Protestant Reformation Questions http://www.hfac.uh.edu/gbrown/philosophers/leibniz/BritannicaPages/Lutheranism/Lutheranism.html Lutheran Beliefs http://www.stjohnpeabody.org/lutheranism.htm What was Martin Luther’s occupation/vocation? Luther was a scholar turned monk.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics