Charlie Hebdo Attacks: Article Analysis

Improved Essays
The western world has a growing problem of assuming Islam, and Muslims in their entirety, are violent. Over the past 13 years, Islam, Muslims, and terrorism have been synonymous in the western mind. Simon Cottee, senior lecturer of Criminology at Kent University, wrote “It Doesn’t Matter That Islam Inspired the ‘Charlie Hebdo’ Attacks” for Vice Magazine to illustrate the polar views on Islam in regards to terrorism and religious tolerance. At the end of the article, Cottee asks the audience to learn from the tragedy and consider the fact that everyone perceives religion differently, proposing that the assailants are morally wrong and not wrong “according to an imagined pristine Islam” (Cottee 1). Cottee’s article is a good ice breaker for a …show more content…
Cottee likely wrote this way on purpose; he wanted to draw new readers in with more than one example before he gets to his point; perception is everything. His title also serves as his thesis and bait, perhaps wanting to snatch readers who have already formed their opinion and argument on the issue at hand. The tone of the article is very relaxed and feels similar to a discussion young adults would have in their own peer group, effectively relaying the message to readers who have trouble or no interest in keeping updated on current events. The particular writing style Cottee has may bait the reader into continuing on with a subject that may be boring or irrelevant; this opens up the opportunity for further conversations and education on the subject of Islam and …show more content…
He also has experience teaching students at Kent University in the United Kingdom, where he is a senior lecturer in Criminology, suggesting that he has experience appealing to youth on topics of religion in relation to crime. Cottee also serves on the editorial board of Studies in Conflict and Terrorism at Kent University. The article is written tactfully with multiple audiences in mind, despite it being written for a magazine that caters to adult youth. He is reasonable, non-threatening and writes plainly enough for all levels of education to understand. This particularly relaxed style helps Cottee reach out to people of different political viewpoints and religious backgrounds. His opinion is most likely contested but he chooses to write it anyways. However, his attitude toward people who choose to believe that Islam is bad and all Muslims are terrorists bleeds into his article slightly; that perhaps they should be held in contempt as well. To a reader of the opposite viewpoint, this may be perceived as threatening and cause them to stop reading or to not consider his viewpoint at

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    INTERVIEW An individual who immigrated to the United States 1. Where are they from and how old were they when they got here? a. Sarahi is from Tijuana and arrived in National City, California when she 16 years old. 2.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Krakauer makes the claim that Greg Mortenson, although a professed humanitarian, uses fear mongering to make his book more exciting. On page 46, he quotes a passage from Three Cups of Tea about Wahhabi madrassas, and then writes, “From someone who presents himself as a steadfast of anti-Muslim bigotry, such fear mongering is hard to square.” This claim is partially substantiated, because although he does have a little bit of good evidence to show that, it is not varied, and his choice to include dubious evidence mars his ethos. Krakauer quotes Nosheen Ali, a “sociologist with a doctorate from Cornell who has conducted extensive research in Gilgit-Baltisan”(44), “The subtext of Mortenson’s book, she rebukes, is rooted in a narrative of…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis of Bjorn Staerk’s “Living with Terrorism” “Living with Terrorism,” is a blog post written by Norwegian blogger Bjorn Staerk on bearstrong.net in 2006. In this essay, Steark provides his perspective on how to manage and cope with the sensitive topic of worldwide terrorism. Intended for the conservative public, this essay is also written as a rebuttal to the far-right and anti-Islamic Norwegian blogger Peder Are Nøstvold Jensen (aka Fjordman). Fjordman suggested in one of his blogs that Islam, not Islamism--the reform movement that advocates the reordering of government and society in accordance with laws prescribed by Islamic beliefs-- was the culprit behind terrorism, and this greatly displeased Staerk’s Universalist creed…

    • 2224 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since Salman Rushdie was condemned to death by the Ayatollah for his book, “The Satanic Verses.” I have been intrigued on how anyone could write something and have such a large group of people want you dead. The last 10 years has shown us how radical Islam is showing how cruel and brutal they can be with no compromise. In 1993, the judges for the “Booker of Bookers panel explicitly singled out Midnight’s Children for novelty of content and the three judges agreed that Rushdie's...stood above the rest….” W. L. Webb, one of the judges, summed up the thinking of the panel when he concluded that Midnight's Children "changed the way we understand a violently changing world” (Su).…

    • 269 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Reshma Memon Yaqub’s “You People Did This,” the fall of the twin towers had just occurred, although worried about her family and Muslim Community she’s very worried about all the mayhem that will be caused by this. She doesn’t want Muslims to have this burden of being held accountable for the attack and wants Americans to understand that violence isn’t Islam. The real jihad (struggle to please god) isn’t the Muslims, it’s the Americans struggling though the hard times, and it’s the Americans trying to blame others for their own concerns. In this essay, Yaqub uses several modes to help get her purpose across.…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zeitoun Book Review

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    by Victoria Patterson, one’s conception of the Islamic community will be refuted since Zeitoun might be the “typical Muslim” they later expected him to be. They will see these actions that every Muslim takes as the “more violent, and his Islamic views more radical”. The “heroism” will be replaced with the “Radical Muslim beliefs” stereotypes and other phrases majorly used to describe the Muslim…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The house of a debate on The Doha Debate show believed that “The War on Terror has become a War on Islam.” Anas ALtikriti and Dr. Mustafa were with the motion; Faisal Abdul Rauf and Ramzi Khouri were against the motion. What compelled me to write this analysis is Anas Altikriti, founder of Muslim Association of Britain, and his usage of rhetoric to drive his appeal to ethos and pathos. Anas started with a nice introduction that restated what the house believes and how complex the issue is. Altikriti knows that his audience might not know the issue the he and other debaters are debating about.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Very recently, it may have come to your attention that an assigned novel in AP Language and Composition, Zeitoun, has been come into question on its credibility. The riveting narrative, written by award-winning author Dave Eggers, Zeitoun depicts the struggle of a man, Zeitoun, and his family after the catastrophe of Hurricane Katrina and life during the War on Terror. According to several news articles, it is known that Zeitoun has been arrested and charged for domestic violence and stalking against his now ex-wife, Kathy. Although it is not confirmed by Eggers himself that he was aware of these crimes, it is implied in local news articles. Hence, the novel is in controversy on whether it is still a good influence for students at Mills High School.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When considering matters of terrorism, it is helpful to remember that the topic is highly charged with rhetoric. Not only are the semantics of the word itself fiercely contested, but terrorist acts both inspire, and are motivated by, unending torrents of nationalism, idealism, hate speech and propaganda. So in analyzing Daniel Byman and Christine Fair’s “The Case for Calling Them Nitwits”, a thought to bear in mind is that the article can itself be considered an analysis of rhetoric – the broadly defined rhetoric used by terrorist groups to recruit new members and inspire fear in their targets. In their opinion piece, Byman and Fair provide a plethora of well-presented evidence countering two of the strongest aspects of this rhetoric: the logical premise that they are capable of…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    9/11 Social Studies

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    have their experiences been like in the public sphere such as schools and the labor market and have they faced any challenges, such as racism or discrimination, and do the Muslim youth feel they have to negotiate their identities as a Muslim and a Canadian. I wanted to know if the experiences of the Muslim youth in my study would be positive or negative. The overall goal for my study was to find connections with Canadian citizenship and national belonging. Through this research paper I will provide: an introduction to my research, background history of Canada and Muslims, a brief literature review of Muslims after the 9/11 including media exposure and experiences, a methodology review, the findings of my study, analyzing my results through…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    9/11 Attacks

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Throughout the article, Goldberg writes in an angry, almost frustrated tone, which will lead to a passionate response from an audience sharing his views and an equally strong reaction from those opposed to his claim. Goldberg uses charged words and phrases such as when Goldberg describes Muslims as fanatics, which further reveal his bias. Goldberg misrepresents data which clearly supports the claim that Islamophobia is on the rise. Goldberg’s argument suffers from Goldberg’s bias which heavily saturates his writing. Goldberg’s argument is further weakened by the lack of evidence presented.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Almond then goes on to list the books flaws. Almond calls the books most glaring weakness is its one sided flow of information. Almond claims that the book is rhetorical, not arguementative; and paints Muslims in a mostly negative light and notes that the only “good” Muslims that show up in the book are victims of “bad” muslims. The book’s lack of counter arguments and opposing narratives is also discussed. Almond claims that the book ingnores history that is inconvinent for its narrative and challenges Murray’s notion of a Christian Europe when historically Europe has been home to…

    • 1883 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    RADICALISATION IN MODERN SOCIETY Communities demonstrate a very significant part to radicalization in the contemporary societies. A society which compels citizens to actively engage in volunteer services in order to fulfill their civil responsibilities. However, in the urgency to respond to such expectations, sometimes intentionally or unintentionally terrorism and radicalization take the lime light. A very little empirical study has been critically evaluated to understand the reflection of such community engagement in the modern world (Crawford, 1997).…

    • 2036 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Good Muslim, Bad Muslim, which is written by Mahmood Mamdani in 2004, discusses the aftermath of September 11, 2001. When this event occurred, Mamdani was in New York where he experienced the event and had seen how people viewed Islam as a political identity. Mamdani begins with modern violence, as he gives a critique of the cultural interruption of politics. Furthermore, he argues about how we should find an alternative way of thinking about the politics of Islam surrounding 9/11. He argues that the consequences of 9/11 traces back to the action the United States actions us took during the cold war and its roots of terror.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The final statement claims that millions of other Middle Eastern families, as well as his own family, have been losing the war against extremism. Contradictory to this, Al-Solaylee earlier stated that, they merely chose to conform to extremism, while he mentions himself left for England to study once he saw beheadings taking place under Sharia Law. Al-Solaylee blames the social changes and the acceptance of extremist Muslim practices through gradual change and brainwashing through the media. Unfortunately, the cause of social change is contradicted half way through the article when he mentions how people were beheaded in daylight under sharia law. This sounds like enforced change, rather than gradual acceptance.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays