• Home Page
  • Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Similarities Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

Improved Essays
Show More
Our Government. The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is but the Anti-Federalists are those who argued for better. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, these proposals for the future of our country conflicted on multiple levels between the two groups. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). Those who supported this document were the Anti-Federalists. Patrick Henry, George Mason, and Richard Henry Lee were key member behind promoting the ideals presented in the Articles of Confederation. These men wrote and published literature to advocate for the Antifederalist perspective. …show more content…
This is expressing our rights of being a US citizen but it does not allow us to impose our own ideals on others. Today we know that we have a right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness from both the constitution and the Bill of Rights. But during this feud there was no Bill of Rights present and because of this Ani-Federalists has lots to argue about. If you can imagine this from their point of view, imagine you didn’t know what your rights are as a person. If there were no outright definition many people probable were confuse and felt ripped off from what they deserve. Citizens did not know they had the rights to speak their mind and protect their land and what they believed in. Liberty is a main right that is important to a countless number of people however many take it for granted now. Liberty is being free within society, to not have restrictions by authority on someone’s way of life. This was crucial to discuss when setting in place the laws of the land because the Anti-federalist group believed it wasn’t present in the proposal. In the literature that is published by Cetnil we read from a man begging for the attention that the new constitution needs reconsideration and further detail to improve what this document could be to the people. He implores the group that is known as the the Free men of Pennsylvania that their liberties can and are being compromised if the document were to be instituted as law. Furthermore he conveys those who are not part of this new re-enforced government will be isolated from a type of elite aristocrats. This was a problem the Anti-Federalist did not want to be a part of because it was an obvious violation of human rights. Federalists believed that when their plan was put into action the liberties of man were obvious and fully defined. As I understand it by stating “that all men are created equal, that they are

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Similarities Between Federalists And Democratic-Republicans
    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Similarities Between Federalists And Democratic-Republicans

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were very different political parties. One example is that Federalists thought the public office should be ruled by educated men who owned property and would protect rights. According to the textbook on page 292 it states, "Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.". Although the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a few people controlling a strong central government. The textbook states on page 292, "In contrast, the Republicans feared a strong central government controlled by a few people".…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis
    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    Americans’ rights and liberties are overtly expressed through the Bill of Rights. Federalists and Republicans possessed contradicting views of the same document, fueling debate. Key Federalists such as Alexander Hamilton intelligently reformed the American economy, eliminating the national debt. The Federalist Papers strategically expressed the movement’s motivations and ideals, thus bolstering support. More than 200 years later, the Federalist-Antifederalist debate comprised of the same key issues that face our nation…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Freeman's Arguments Against The New Constitution
    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Freeman's Arguments Against The New Constitution

    With regard to the contentious attitude towards the new constitution of the United States, a Freeman’s Essay to the People of Connecticut discredits the arguments against the ratification of the new constitution and urges the readers to independently and justly judge the constitution. From the title of the document, the author is clearly pleading to the citizens, specifically of Connecticut, to disregard the eloquently formulated objections by anti-federalists against the constitution and outright denies any validity of these claims. The author’s criticism of the public’s ignorant acceptance of the opinions of influential figures serves to outline a core problem of the ratification of the constitution; the fear that the important values of…

    • 889 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Is The Constitution Still Relevant Today
    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Is The Constitution Still Relevant Today

    On the federal level, the Constitution set a division among the executive, legislative, and judicial branches; locally the government must be granted permission by the state and the governing bodies are directly elected by the people. In total it left the maximum amount of freedom in the hands of individuals. This being said, a common concern among many in today’s society is whether or not a document that was written 229 years ago can still remain relevant in a world that is frequently changing. The Constitutions relevancy is based on the fact that it is a living document written with the possibility of amendments that allows for interpretation by the judicial system, that its purpose is to protect against dictatorship and usurping of power brought up by Anti-Federalist fears, and that it ultimately serves as a protective barrier for citizens’ civil…

    • 1481 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Anti Federalism Pros And Cons

    Some of America’s finest minds got together for the Philadelphia convention to figure out which form of government would be best. The Federalists were formed by Alexander Hamilton and its other well-known members were Benjamin Franklin, John Jay, George Washington, and James Madison. Federalists desired a secure central government and feeble state governments, preferred the Constitution to aid the amount owed and stress of the American Revolution, were against the Bill of Rights, and were supported in large urban areas. Meanwhile, the Anti-federalists were composed by Patrick Henry, John Hancock, Richard Lee, George Mason, and Mercy Warren. Anti-federalists insisted that power in the states not in the central government, picked the Articles…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq
    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Articles Of Confederation Dbq

    In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Constitutional Convention
    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Compare And Contrast The Compromises Of The Constitutional Convention

    In 1787, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention meant to revise the Articles of Confederation. Instead they began a compromise to form a constitution. James Madison from Virginia proposed a plan that called for a three branch government: legislative, judicial, and executive. This was meant to separate the powers, assuring that not one group or individual could have too much authority. In this plan was also a system that allowed each branch to check the other.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq
    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    American Revolution Dbq

    Anti- Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty” (Bill of Rights Institute, "Bill of Rights of the United States of America…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Similarities And Differences Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists
    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Similarities And Differences Between The Federalist And Anti-Federalists

    Because of the group’s disagreements, they came to write explanations for their position in essay. These essays came to be known as The Federalist Papers and The Anti-federalist Papers. The Federalist papers had a main reason to convey the interpretation to the new constitution. While the Anti-Federalist Papers was pleading those who still secured their rights to allow discussion over the same document. By reading them, we learn that the Anti-Federalist did not think the new Constitution accurately explained the rights of its…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Abolitionism In The Jacksonian Era
    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Abolitionism In The Jacksonian Era

    This upcoming new generation idealized citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws governing all Americans. In the words of Horace Greeley, the basis for America during the time was by the saying, “ Might makes right”’ ( Magliocca 93). This was to say that the legal order was not to be based on the prejudice by the godly nature of the upper class, but by personal liberties alone. In the ways of this egalitarian society, Abolitionist believed that they could change this world into a society in which their view were instead “ right makes might.”’…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Arguments
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti Federalists Arguments

    In the argument about the ratification of the United States Constitution, both the supporters and the opponents had substantial reasoning for their viewpoints. However, these groups differentiated greatly on what problems were most significant to their arguments. Each group came up with smaller “subgroups” of issues they had with the Constitution or Articles of Confederation. The supporting group of the Constitution was the Federalists, who believed in a strong central government that would better protect and support the new upcoming nation.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Anti Federalists Essay
    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Anti Federalists Essay

    Two of the major leaders of this group were Patrick Henry and Thomas Jefferson, who was overseas during this time. The Anti-Federalists thought that under the Articles people had the rights that they rightfully deserved. Under the Articles, the poor people benefitted greatly. During the process of trying to get the new Constitution ratified the Anti-Federalists felt that under this new government the rich had all of the power instead of the people (Doc 5). Under the Articles the states had the power to make laws and do whatever they pleased, and to some of the states the idea of changing to a government that the central government had all the power was absolutely absurd.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Summary Of Give Me Liberty By Eric Foner
    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Summary Of Give Me Liberty By Eric Foner

    Respectfully, the freedmen requested that the end of slavery be enforced; however, these men were not satisfied with their promised freedom. Without hesitation, these brave freedmen took the risk to seize freedom and began pushing for their right to vote. This quest for equal rights began in the first sentence when they introduce themselves as “American citizens” which they had never previously been able to call themselves (Foner, Voices of Freedom 2). This terminology of citizenship, which began this persuasive petition, was eventually the same terminology used in the 14th Amendment which, at the time, gave all American men who were also citizens, the right to vote. After the mentioning of the Constitution, the authors tactically introduced God into the argument.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists
    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist Vs. Anti-Federalists

    Fifty Federalists, with the same general idea of creating a stronger central government, all got together to draw up an entirely new charter, the modern day Constitution. Many debates occurred within the forming of this document, mainly revolving around slaves and specifications regarding the executive powers. The two main opposing members regarding the executive powers was Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton wanted a single man to be elected for life for executive power. The main argument against this was if one man was in charge, the government would be far too similar to a monarchy.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    African American Freedom Essay
    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages

    African American Freedom Essay

    If the meaning of freedom has been a frontline throughout history, so too has been the definition of those enabled to enjoy its blessings. Founded on the principle that liberty is a prerogative of all mankind, the United States, from the onset, patently deprived many of its own people of freedom.…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2024 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings