Side note i didn't know we had to have partners because i wasn't there and i tried to find one but i didn't as you can see i tried could i still get my points?
In what ways were James Jarvis and Stephen Kumalo are the same,and in what ways he is unlike him ? They both learn about their sons problems that they have in africa. They found out things about their sons that they never knew they were capable of. Both Kumalo and Mr. Jarvis are searching for their sons. Jarvis is a rich(weathy) white man. Kumalo didn’t have a lot of money. Jarvis is in politics and care for justice. Kumalo is a man of god .
Comment on what we see on what james wife margaret and stephen kumalo's wife. Are they the same? Margaret takes her son's death hardly. Kumalo's …show more content…
By the time they do it’s too late. Is it a fair comment on kumalo or jarivs ? i feel like it’s not a fair comment. But kumalo because it is not too late for him to know his son. But it’s too late for jarvis. He can’t do anything about it. If i could i would say it’s not right.
How much have we learned about Arthur jarvis from what his father see and fins in his study?
. Mr. Harrison also brings Jarvis the manuscript that Arthur was working on when he was killed. In this manuscript, Arthur argues that those who say God created black people to be unskilled laborers are un-Christian because they wish to prevent a segment of the population from developing their God-given abilities. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/cry/section7/page/2/ i got it from there because i really didn’t get this chapter. He is still thinks that blacks are the reason for everything. But if a white person did it he still would believe it . he was trying to find out who killed him also.
My judgement on the judge judgement on chapter 28. The judge i feel like is open minded to what everyone got to say. He wants nothing but the truth. the judge says johannes and Matthew not guilty. But want to have more investigation . he finds Ablsom guilty of murder because of evidence. Ablsom have to get hang because of that. I think his judgement was okay i
In what ways were James Jarvis and Stephen Kumalo are the same,and in what ways he is unlike him ? They both learn about their sons problems that they have in africa. They found out things about their sons that they never knew they were capable of. Both Kumalo and Mr. Jarvis are searching for their sons. Jarvis is a rich(weathy) white man. Kumalo didn’t have a lot of money. Jarvis is in politics and care for justice. Kumalo is a man of god .
Comment on what we see on what james wife margaret and stephen kumalo's wife. Are they the same? Margaret takes her son's death hardly. Kumalo's …show more content…
By the time they do it’s too late. Is it a fair comment on kumalo or jarivs ? i feel like it’s not a fair comment. But kumalo because it is not too late for him to know his son. But it’s too late for jarvis. He can’t do anything about it. If i could i would say it’s not right.
How much have we learned about Arthur jarvis from what his father see and fins in his study?
. Mr. Harrison also brings Jarvis the manuscript that Arthur was working on when he was killed. In this manuscript, Arthur argues that those who say God created black people to be unskilled laborers are un-Christian because they wish to prevent a segment of the population from developing their God-given abilities. http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/cry/section7/page/2/ i got it from there because i really didn’t get this chapter. He is still thinks that blacks are the reason for everything. But if a white person did it he still would believe it . he was trying to find out who killed him also.
My judgement on the judge judgement on chapter 28. The judge i feel like is open minded to what everyone got to say. He wants nothing but the truth. the judge says johannes and Matthew not guilty. But want to have more investigation . he finds Ablsom guilty of murder because of evidence. Ablsom have to get hang because of that. I think his judgement was okay i