Similarities Between Julius Caesar And Martin Luther King Jr

Improved Essays
People know right from wrong, because it is an instinct that everyone is born with. When society knows that there is something wrong, they choose to sit back and not draw too much attention to themselves. In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar and in Martin Luther King Jr's “I Have a Dream” speech, there was an issue to be discussed that no one could quite put their finger on. In Mark Antony’s case, the Roman citizens did not see anything wrong with what the conspirators had done to Caesar, and in Martin Luther King’s case, the African-American people were not brave enough to stand for their rights and explain to others that the way that they are being treated because of the color of their skin is wrong. It took one brave person to speak in front of …show more content…
After going to see the conspirators and asking them for some favors, Mark Antony is speaking to the plebeians at Julius Caesar’s funeral. Mark Antony is angry at the Conspirators for what they have done to Caesar, especially Brutus. He starts of his speech by calling them “Friends, Romans, countrymen” (JC.3.2.77). By saying that he implies that he is one of them, that he is a Roman citizen, and that they are all equal. This will help him gain their trust and respect, and they will continue to listen to his speech as they keep in mind that they are equal to him. Many other great speakers, such as Martin Luther King, have used ethos to authorize his credibility. Martin uses an example of ethos that is undoubtedly similar to the way Mark Antony uses this rhetorical device. He implies that he is equal to his audience by saying, ‘There are those who are asking the devotees of civil rights, ‘When will you be satisfied?’ We can never be satisfied as long as the Negro is the victim of the unspeakable horrors of police brutality. We can never be satisfied as long as our bodies, heavy with the fatigue of travel, cannot gain lodging in the motels of the highways and the hotels of the cities. We cannot be satisfied as long as the negro's basic mobility is from a smaller ghetto to a larger one. We can never be satisfied as long as our children …show more content…
Both speakers intend to manipulate the audience's emotion to get them to see the issue from their point of view, but subsequently Mark Antony’s use of it is going to be more effective. The plebeians are listening to Antony’s speech as he talks about the conspirators and Caesar. It bothers Antony that the people are not grieving over Caesar’s death. He tells the people how Caesar was killed, as if he were there and saw the whole thing. He starts to see that his story is working and says, “O, now you weep, and I perceive you feel/The dint pity. These are gracious drops./Kind souls, what weep you when you but behold /Our Caesar’s vesture wounded? Look you here!/Here is himself, marr’d, as you see, with traitors” (JC.3.2.198-202). Antony is trying to make their pity for Caesar turn into anger towards the conspirators. Now that he has them angry at the conspirators, Antony is able to grab more of their attention as they anxiously wait for his speech to be over, so that they can hunt down the conspirators and help Antony avenge Caesar’s tragic demise. Martin Luther King is speaking to the audience in a way that makes them feel that sense of unity and equality. In addition he goes on to tell the audience that “You have been the veterans of creative suffering. Continue to work with the faith that unearned

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s speech was based on the use of pathos. He mentioned the will of Caesar but then told the people, “It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (Anderson 840). The people did not realize that he was manipulating them into demanding to hear the will. His speech was filled with emotional appeals and veiled calls to action such as this. At one point in his speech, he crooned, “Good friends, sweet friends, let me not stir you up to such a sudden flood of mutiny” (Anderson 838).…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Malcolm X and Martin Luther King Jr. had different beliefs that radiated from their childhood and the values that were taught to them . Malcolm X was born into a christian family that resided in Lansing, Michigan. Malcolm’s childhood had started out rough with the death of his father when he was only six years old and his mother being placed in a mental hospital when he was thirteen. Malcolm’s father passing away soon caused him to drift away from his religious side of life. Soon after, Malcolm had started to engage in immoral and unethical activities in life.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His private arbors, and new-planted orchards” (3.2.247-249). Antony is trying to show the people that someone who is ambitious would not leave all of his land to the people beneath him. Antony's use of logos throughout his speech helped to convince the people that Caesar was not…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Initially, Antony presents a tone of sincerity and relative agreement with the conspirators: “I come to bury Caesar, not to praise him” (). However, as his oration progresses, so too does the tone toward a more dramatic categorization. While Antony prepares to read Caesar’s will to the Roman citizens, he indicates the specific wounds inflicted by Cassius and Brutus: “Look, in this place ran Cassius’ dagger through... Through this the well-beloved Brutus stabbed” (). As a plebeian shouts, “O traitors, villains!”…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony’s funeral speech about Caesar in Act Three demonstrates his own use of rhetoric irony with the help of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos. To begin with, the conspirators and people of Rome could have delivered the message that resulted in his speech. Since the conspirators killed Caesar, Antony got the message that he should strike back. In Antony’s speech, his overall motive was pointing out the ambitions of the conspirators, not Caesar, achieving his goal of rousing the plebeians to riot and civil war. His strong use of ethos…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mark Antony begins his speech by addresses his audience. He refers to them as, “Friends,Roman,Countrymen”( 3.2.131), this articulates that he is bringing himself down to the plebeians level so he can make the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This line is an example of pathos because the line is based mostly on emotion or the sympathy and emotion in the audience. This is important to know because as his speech progresses he uses a lot of rhetoric, such as pathos and ethos. Going on he says “ I come to bury Caesar not to praise him” (3.2.121), Antony uses rhetoric and genuine reminders to ultimately portray Caesar in such a positive light so that the crowd enrages at the conspirators.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This response shows that they fell for Brutus’s form of persuasion, the plebeians want Caesar to rest peacefully. Brutus said similar things in his speech about leaving Ceaser alone. By the plebeian saying this back, it lets Brutus know he was heard. What actions and tricks of Antony’s particularly impress the mob?…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Julius Caesar has many similarities and differences from real life to Shakespeare’s version of Julius Caesar. I am going to focus on the differences, similarities, and omitted facts between the two Julius Caesars. First I will tell about all the differences, then I will go through the similarities, and finally the omitted facts. Here I will tell you about the differences between the actual history of Julius Caesar and Shakespeare’s play.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To explain, Antony finally returned to the topic of the will. The only reason he got off the topic was so that he had time to talk about the conspirators in a negative way. This quote shows how in the next couple lines, Antony will read Caesar’s will to the crowd, saying that they have gained seventy five drachmas and Caesar’s private arbors. The persuasive technique of Pathos was used here as well because this shows that Caesar considered the people of Rome family, which made them very emotional and excited because being family with Caesar meant so much to them. By showing the common people of Rome Caesar’s will, Antony created a whirlwind of emotions throughout the…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In a sarcastic tone, Antony repeatedly referred to these "honourable men". Repeating "Honourable men" is also seen to be ironic, he's ridiculing Brutus and the conspirators saying his idea of Caesar being so ambitious, he's a threat, is something to laugh about. Every time Antony cleverly pauses in his speech to let the plebeians comment, the plebeians are more spiteful toward the conspirators. As the crowd begins to favour Antony the citizens make comments like "Methinks there is much reason in his saying" which shows there change in opinion. Antony said his speech, after Brutus so Antony could adapt to what Brutus has already said and even prove it wrong.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    By using flattery, Antony is able to bring the Plebeians to his side through his speeches at Caesar’s funeral. First, “The noble Brutus Hath told you Caesar was ambitious… And Brutus is an honourable man” (III,ii,77-87). Antony constantly gives credit to the conspirators, especially Brutus. He repeatedly shows that the other speakers at Caesar’s funeral were honorable too.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William Shakespeare’s play “Julius Caesar” Mark Antony unleashes a powerful speech during Caesar’s funeral, aiming to persuade the people of Rome that Brutus was fallacious to kill Caesar and that they should avenge his death. In Antony’s oration, he argues his case against Brutus by using the rhetorical strategies of Ethos, Pathos and Logos to manipulate his audience to be on his side, rather than Brutus’s side. These three persuasion tools allow his audience to connect with him and he is able to effectively argue his case against than Brutus. Antony’s first priority is to establish ethos in his speech. Since Brutus is a friend of the powerful Caesar, Antony must transcend his credibility and prove to the Romans…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Antony says this because Brutus was the only conspirator who acted for the good of Rome. Therefore, because Brutus acted for the sake of Rome rather than envy…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ghosts often represent an evil spirit in transition. The spirit cannot die either because it is in purgatory or because it has unfinished business on Earth. The only assumption one can make when a vengeful ghost appears is that no good thing could come from this visit. Shakespeare uses ghosts in many of his plays to help the plot move along or to foreshadow an outcome. Julius Caesar and Hamlet are just two examples.…

    • 1505 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Antony makes the people remember all that Caesar has done for them, and slowly manipulates them with his words. “You are not wood, you are not stones, but men”(III,ii,139). Again Antony uses parallel structure to sway the crowd. He tells them that he can’t read the will because they are men and would become enraged, then tells them that they are his heirs. Antony understands that in order to go up against the conspirators, he needs the people and can only get them, by manipulating their emotions to discredit Brutus.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays