I have chosen to compare Abraham Lincoln to Julius Caesar. The reason I compared Abraham
Lincoln and Caesar is because they are both popular and you can really see how much changed from when Caesar helped expand the roman empire to when Abraham became president. I also know more about Abraham Lincoln than the other options.
Julius Caesar was a Roman Politician (July 12 or 13, 100 BC, Rome – March 15, 44 BC,
Rome) who helped greatly with the rise of the Roman Empire. His Parents were Gaius Julius
Caesar and Aurelia Cotta. Gaius Governed the province of Asia. The family came from Alba
Longa south of Rome, in 85 BC Caesars father died so Caesar was head of the family at 16.
Caesar was taken hostage by …show more content…
The upper-class government did not like Caesars actions so around 60 senators assassinated him in the senate
Abraham Lincoln was the 16 th American president from 1861-1865. He led the USA through the civil war. He was born February 12, 1809. His parents were Nancy Lincoln and
Thomas Lincoln, he was left-educated and became a lawyer in Illinois and in 1854 he became a leader in building a new republican party. Abraham did not approve of the expansion of slavery and he made seven southern lave states secede from the USA. Lincoln was assassinated on April
14, 1865 by John Wilkes Booth, he was shot in the head while he was watching “Our American
Cousin” in Washington D.C.
Abraham and Caesar were the same in some ways but very different in most, they both were very determined to complete their goals, both were assassinated, they were also both strong leaders. Caesar on the other hand was way worse of a person than Abraham, he would remove his enemies water supply making them dehydrate and the survivors would have their hands cut off, he was also a dictator. Abrahams goals were more peaceful such as wanting