Similarities Between Heckler Vs Chaney

Improved Essays
Agencies have discretion and they are able to use that discretion as they see fit. However, when a challenge to that discretion becomes an issue, the court can become involved. The two cases are similar because they are challenging an agency’s discretion, but end with two different outcomes. These are very important cases dealing with constitutional rights.
In Heckler v. Chaney, inmates serving a death sentence filed a complaint against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) alleging the drugs used for their executions were not approved for human executions and therefore violated the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. The FDA decided not to act and the court agreed ruling in their favor. The court stated the FDA’s decision was “presumptively

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Slaughterhouse Cases: The state of Louisiana made a monopoly of slaughtering operations and sold it to one specific company, eliminating all other companies against their will. The companies said that since it was not voluntary, it was considered involuntary servitude, and infringed on their equal protection rights and also burdened their access to liberty and property without due process. The first section forbids the landing or slaughtering of animals whose flesh is indented for food within certain boundaries. Another section authorizes the company to establish and erect within certain territory, one large scale slaughterhouse is to exist and the rest are not allowed business within those territories. Also, all other stock landings and slaughterhouses are to be closed as a result of this case.…

    • 1749 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kansas Vs Crane Case Study

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Content of Litigation Plaintiff: Argued the New York ban violates the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause by allowing ill adults to end their own lives. Also brought up the point that there was no direct distinguished difference between the two ways. Defendant: Defended the ban stating that it prolonged the lifespan of the patients and it was valid as it had important public interest that satisfied the constitutional requirements. III.…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They believed that Congress was violating the Twenty-first Amendment by taking away states decision for their minimun drinking age. This case brings the issue of federalism into play by questioning who has the power over law-making. Does Congress have the right to take away a states right to decide the legal drinking age? While South Dakota obviously thought that this was unconstitutional, the Supreme Court had believed otherwise. With a 7 to 2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled Congress' law constitutional.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leadership Ethics The Mayor of Crestview, David Cadle shows Laissez-Faire leadership style. The Laissez-faire leader takes a “hands-off, let-things-ride” approach (Northouse, 2016). The leader abdicates responsibility, delays decisions, gives no feedback, and makes little effort to help followers satisfy their needs. In the case of Crestview, Mayor Cadle didn’t make any comment at the violation of sunshine law by the City Council members.…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Throughout all of American history, no other document has maintained an equally important and ever changing role in our government than the United States Constitution. The Constitution drew the plans for the creation the three branches of government and provided the structure on which the national government would grow. The most famous aspect of the Constitution is the Bill of Rights. Written by James Madison as a response to the States’ demands that individual liberties be provided and protected, the Bill of Rights serves to establish the personal rights of every man in America. Among these rights are the right to counsel, which is preserved in the Sixth Amendment, and the right to not withstand or be subjected to cruel or unusual punishment,…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Tinker Vs Moines

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In December of 1965, Mary Beth Tinker, her brother John Tinker, and their friend Christopher Eckhardt, students of Des Moines public schools, decided they were going to wear black armbands to school for a period of time in protest of the Vietnam war. The school board found out about the students’ plan to protest, and decided to put a ban on the wearing of black armbands on school property. If any student came to school wearing an armband, they would be suspended. The three students decided to come to school wearing the armbands, and they were suspended. The students decided to sue the school district, through their parents, and the case ended up going all the way to the United States Supreme Court.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prior to this case, it was looked down upon for people to be supporting abortions. However, after this case interpreted the Constitution to respect the privacy of people, and for the privacy to include abortions, many more people began to be supportive of supporting them. This demonstrates how judicial review has allowed the constitution to be and continue to be relevant through numerous…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States Supreme Court has been a topic of controversy on several cases, during the last several decades in our country. If we look back in time, history shows us that the US Supreme Court has made several big mistakes in the ways they handled several federal court rulings. In the year 1944, just briefly after the battles and war between the United States and Japan, the Supreme Court ruled a law that would be considered immoral, and racial profiling in the present time. The Korematsu v. United States court case of 1944 was a heavily criticized court ruling.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I choose to do my research paper on one of my favorite court cases in American history Miranda vs. Arizona case. I’m choosing this court case because it brings up two amendments that tend to be overlooked by law enforcement comes around and one of the most well-known sayings. First I will be giving a quick background about those two amendments and then I will start talking about the case. The issues about this case involved the fifth and sixth amendment. Let me explain both of these amendments.…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case was appealed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. There were a lot of same sex couples that had sued their state agencies in their home states to challenge the states bans on same sex marriage or to have same sex marriage available the way hetero marriage is available. The plaintiffs argued that the “states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe V. Wade Problem

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thousands of children are in a “life or death” situation, in which their life is chosen by the mother. The mother decides, without seeing or knowing the baby, whether to keep or abort the child. Abortion has caused many outbreaks throughout history and has influenced the world that we live in today. Over time, this controversial issue has divided people. Restrictions on abortions were challenged among the sexual revolution and feminist movements of the 60’s (“Roe v. Wade (1973) para.…

    • 1673 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eight Amendment Essay

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This Court has reiterated that the Eight Amendment prohibits the execution of a person with a mental disability. The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals (“CCA”) have used the seven factors outlined in Briseno instead of using current medical standards to determine if the Petitioner was intellectually disabled. The Atkins decision was intended to protect all person with a mental disability from execution; however, this goal was undermined by the CCA, by incorporating inadequate protective standards leading to the death of those with an intellectual disability. The usage by the CCA of outdated medical standards and the Briseno factor, the Court now holds, creates an unfairness and risk of execution of a person with a mental disability, and thus unconstitutional.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both articles describe the situation of the flag burning by Gregory Lee Johnson was a criminal act that should be penalized for, but the text of each of them explain their own opinionated answer on why so. The Texas vs Johnson Majority Opinion’s tone was more analytical, however, the editorial’s tone was a thoughtful and virtuous. Firstly, Texas vs Johnson, Majority Opinion article explicates the court case of Johnson about the burning of the flag in analytical tone. “We submit that nobody can suppose that this one gesture of an unknown man will change our Nation’s attitude toward its flag.”…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    8th Amendment Cruel

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The U.S. Constitution’s clause regarding “cruel and unusual punishment” is the most essential and contentious part of the Eighth Amendment. What does it mean for a punishment of a crime to be “cruel and unusual”? How does one evaluate a punishment’s cruelty? The Eighth Amendment, ratified in 1791, includes only sixteen words: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted” (Eighth Amendment).…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commision was heard by the US Supreme Court December 5, 2017 and will be decided in 2018. The owner of Masterpiece Cakeshop, Jack Phillips, is a christian man that designs cakes in the store. David Mullins and Charlie Craig are a same sex couple that went to Masterpiece Cakeshop with the intent of buying a wedding cake. David and Charlie asked to order a cake for their wedding, but Phillips told them that he would not make the wedding cake because it denied his religious beliefs. Phillips still offered to serve them, but he refused to make a wedding cake for a same-sex marriage.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays