Similarities Between Free Will And Calusal Determinism

Improved Essays
The debate about free will and causal determinism parallels, in many ways, another debate about free will, this one stemming from what is often called ‘theological determinism’. Some religious traditions hold that God is ultimately responsible for everything that happens. According to these traditions, God’s willing x is necessary and sufficient for x. But if He is ultimately responsible for everything in virtue of what He wills, then He is ultimately responsible for all the actions and volitions performed by agents. God’s willing that Allison take the dog for a walk is thus necessary and sufficient for Allison taking the dog for a walk. But if this is true, it is hard to see how Allison could have free

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the following, I will argue that people act upon their own free will and not through determinism, and disprove the third and fourth components of Strawson’s initial Basic Argument. Determinism is defined as the theory that everything that happens is determined to happen exactly as it does by what has happened before. Essentially, this means that every choice that a person makes they have not actually made- their choice was determined for them long ago and they are acting how they believe they chose to act. This is similar to the Christian belief of predestination, which is defined as the foreordaining of all that will happen in the future. The principal difference between determinism and predestination is that the concept of predestination…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This argument states that everything we do is caused by forces over which we have no control, consequently we never act freely (Rachels and Rachels 110). They want us to focus on the understanding, that we should believe that our actions are out of control because “we are a part of nature, our brains are composed of atoms and like everything else, composed of atoms, they are subject to laws of physics” (Rachels and Rachels 110). Determinism has three main viewpoints; the first is, actions are caused, the second would be that caused actions are not free and the third is that actions are not free. Rachels and Rachels go on further to explain. We obviously don’t have the capability of doing certain things, However, we have the ability to exercise free will.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Exposition of the Problem of Evil In my paper, I will present the argument Weirob gives on the Problem of Evil, and explain Miller’s response to the Problem of Evil. I will explain why the character of Weirob argues it is impossible for an omniscient, omnipotent, and totally good God to exist simultaneously with evil in the world and go into detail about how Weirob believes that if God has these traits, He should be able to eliminate all evils in the world before they occur. Then I will give Miller’s defense to this argument which includes how God and evil can both exist in the world.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The debate of Free Will v Determinism is one that has gone on for centuries, and shall continue to go on for many to come. There are many who believe that their view is the end all, be all, correct view to hold. While not all of these thinkers are correct in their standings, Paul Holbach’s essay, “The Illusion of Free Will,” lays out a strong argument for universal determinism; man does not have any free will, and all of his actions are determined by the laws of nature. His argument is one that is accurate and strong, leaving little to criticize, despite what many believe to be proof that he is incorrect: the presence of choice and the absence of restraint. He takes these two beliefs and shows exactly why they do not denote free will, and all…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are two standard requirements for free will: alternate possibilities and ultimate responsibility. Alternate possibilities mean that the metaphorical path before any agent must be one with forking paths. In terms of alternate possibilities, free will requires the ability to do otherwise. In other words, open futures are necessary for free will to exist. This leads to the second condition for free will: ultimate responsibility.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is there such a thing like free will? Are human actions based on real human choices or there is something else hidden behind the whole world idea? How are these all related to determinism? Well, in the field of philosophy these questions are well known and wait for a possible correct answer without any results. Philosophers have been arguing all around the “free will” topic for a long time and discovered that there is not such a correct answer to explain and attest the validity of this conception.…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Determinism And Free Will

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It seems that determinism are in conflict with free will. Compatibilism is a concept that free will and determinism are compatible. In this paper, I will first state the contradiction between free will and determinism, then illustrate what is compatibilism, with most of the the problem that a compatibilist would face regarding freedom. To begin, determinism is that “human behavior is entirely governed by causal law” (Ayer, 1954, p.271).…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to the question of free will, I would have to say I am a hard determinist. I once thought that we had a choice, but these choices were decided by our world. I had some understanding of this idea without searching out an answer to describe it as hard determinism. The universe has it's own natural processes that we understand through chemistry, physics, math, and other fields of study. These processes have a cause and effect relationship, so they influence our environment, which leads to determined factors.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “apparent fact” according to Sider is that free will and determinism are incompatible. And they are incompatible because of the following arguments: 1. If determinism is true, then everything happens is caused by something happened previously. 2. If everything happens is caused by something happened previously, then we could not have acted freely.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chapter nine in Problems from Philosophy by James Rachels and Stuart Rachels titled “The Debate Over Free Will” is about the three arguments over free will. They are Determinism, Libertarianism, and Compatibilism. The Determinism argument is, as Rachels states, that our actions are manipulated by forces we cannot control. The second argument Rachels presents is Libertarianism which states that some actions we freely choose and that we are also not made to do so. The last argument is Compatibilism and according to Rachels, it states that actions are both free and determined.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout any day of ones life they make decisions that can impact the future for them and others, but is there determinism or free will behind the choices? In life many will make decisions that they feel are their own free will and some will make decisions and say it was a result of the environment they are in and that due to something that previously happened to them was a result in their purposeful choice or intention. Determinism is something that everyone lives with on a daily basis and shows how the environment has had influence on one’s live. Determinism is the doctrine that all events, including human action, are ultimately determined by causes external to the will. Using determinism is something that is used in the process of making the choice, however it is something that usually cannot be controlled by a person before the action takes place.…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We, human beings, in the universe, all feel as though we are making decisions and using our free will each day. We are not forced to do things, we will them to be done. The higher power of God derives in us free will. Determinism is ultimately…

    • 2102 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since free will is nothing more than an idea of being able to control our on actions, assuming we will take ownership of moral responsibility. These actions could be determined by cause and effect. The problem associated with free will, is that it is subjected to many different concepts such as, sin, guilt , responsibility and judgements associated to making decisions for yourself. When a person feels guilty about a decision they made, subconsciously they know they have probably made the wrong decision. I believe natural intentions are proof that free will may have some truth to…

    • 1101 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will and Determinism have been discussed by philosophers for many years. Free will is associated with moral responsibility, and alternative actions that “could have” been taken over the one chosen. Determinism is the opposite view, and is associated with universal causation, and a lack of free will. Determinists believe that a person’s actions are inevitable, they are dictated by a person’s experiences, they believe nurture, nature, and even a person’s genes determine their future actions. Because of this determinists believe people hold no moral responsibility for their actions.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is the possibility of God, some people who believe in God think of him as a being that has absolute control over all of creation. Depending on the details of the view, it may or may not be technically the same thing as determinism, but it still entails the non-existence of free will. To meet a deterministic standard, God 's means of controlling every event would have to be by setting up the laws of nature in a way that they guarantee every outcome God desires. It is the best conclusion for individuals, that if they can make sense of reality with an explanation that applies to everything, then it should be done. With logical reason, making it believable that a universe could be completely planned down to every detail, an individual excepting a matter of fact pre-determined course for the universe makes sense.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays