Forrest And Abraham Lincoln's Authority During The Civil War

Despite the vastly divergent outlooks of Nathan Bedford Forrest and Abraham Lincoln, similarities can be concluded from each man in regard to the Civil War. Within the Civil War, both men displayed a tremendous amount of authority over their subjects. However, Forrest and Lincoln portrayed and managed their authority in differing methods. On one hand, Forrest can be viewed as a vicious, bloodthirsty leader-he enjoys his role in power and is not afraid to flaunt his glory. While on the other hand, you have Abraham Lincoln. Furthermore, Lincoln contrasts Forrest in his overall demeanor and perhaps, acknowledgement and or understanding of his position is one of great power and responsibility. With immense power and authority, a man must be diligent in how he handles procedures. Additionally, Lincoln’s humility and knowledge of the fragile state of the nation is plausible as to why he was greatly respected by the people. …show more content…
Coincidentally, Forrest’s straightforward action and ambition gave him a clear edge when it came to the tactical side of the war. In spite of this audacious attitude, Forrest may have only succeeded in the provocation of the union. Moreover, to verify this claim, one can recall the events that transpired at Fort Pillow. Due to Forrest’s, “bold, daring, or gallant” actions at Fort Pillow, he only seems to prod the union into a state of mobilization and uproar. In comparison, Lincoln appears to generate a calming effect unto his people throughout his deliberation and overall persona. Throughout the struggle the union experienced Abraham Lincoln was able to seemingly undermine the severity of the situation for the protection of the common