Similarities Between Federalists And Anti Federalism

Improved Essays
In Federalism, there are two or more levels of government that have a formal authority over the land and people under it. They have a system of shared powers. There are two categories that people can fall under regarding this, Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists are people who are advocates of the Federalist Party, On the other hand we have the Anti-Federalists. They are people who are against Federalism and oppose the adoption of the U.S. Constitution and believe that the Constitution allowed the federal government too much power and didn’t provided state and local governments with enough. They think that the government is overstepping their power through things such as the doctrine of implied powers, the Commerce Clause, many aspects of the Civil War, and through racial and sexual equality. Yes, the federal government has grown in power but their fear of them taking over the state …show more content…
For some people, just the principles of this can make people lean more toward the Anti-Federalist party because it has the possibility to allow federal government to overstep their power into their units of government. All it does is make it a bit easier for court cases come to a decision. This is a necessary thing to be included in almost any form of government. As time passes, societal needs as a whole changes and so does what the government has to conform their needs to. Without implied powers, we would be encompassed by the same government that was around when the standards were set and that could turn out to be very problematic. In the doctrine of implied powers, there is something called the Necessary and Proper Clause, which is also known as the Elastic Clause. All that does is allow congress to come up with laws that are necessary and proper and then give them the power to carry out those laws with the power of the U.S.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Anti Federalist were a group of people who feared that the central government would have entirely too much power. They didn't like the fact that there would be a person incharge of nations. They also feared that the congress would misfortune the…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tyranny will not be allowed in the United States. Since the Articles of Confederation were passed, it began to become chaotic. In 1787, fifty-five delegates representing 12 of the 13 states came together in Philadelphia to help revise the document and eventually made a new one; The Constitution. How will they make a new Constitution avoiding Tyranny? Tyranny is when an individual, few, or many seize control of other people.…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalists and Democratic-Republicans were very different political parties. One example is that Federalists thought the public office should be ruled by educated men who owned property and would protect rights. According to the textbook on page 292 it states, "Public office, Federalists thought, should be held by honest and educated men who own property and would protect everyone’s rights.". Although the Democratic-Republicans didn't like the idea of a few people controlling a strong central government. The textbook states on page 292, "In contrast, the Republicans feared a strong central government controlled by a few people".…

    • 214 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It didn't make sense for the National Government to have more power leaving the states weak. They also believed that the power among the three branches was not equally divided. The Anti-Federalist were more for the people, more of which were farmers and small landowners. More and more the Anti-Federalist believed that the Federalist were more interested in a aristocratic society which would be at the expense of the commoners of the colonies. Now the way the Federalist won over the ratification of the Constitution was that James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton wrote The Federalist Papers which helped convinced some people to ratify the Constitution.…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The anti-federalists feared that the central government would become too powerful and that if the government would commit an infraction on the states’ rights. The Federalists were in agreement with the constitution. The federalists were wealthy, well educated and were unified by the thought of higher power. The leaders of the Federalists included John Adams and Alexander Hamilton both yearned for an effective constitution. In contrast, the Anti-federalists were generally farmers and anybody that fell below the line of being wealthy.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that though a strong government is needed by every nation for stability, but however, a strong government had its bad sides. With a strong government, the nation can become a monarchy again and can overrule and take control of every aspect and the people’s options or views wouldn’t matter or they wouldn’t have a say in anything or any decision. I also believe that if it wasn’t for the Anti-Federalist, we would be overruled by the government and that we, the people of the United States of American, would never have any individual right protected and there would be no creation of the Bill of Rights. Nonetheless, the Constitution was seen as a bundle of compromises and regardless of what side anyone was on.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before the ratification of the Constitution of 1787, the Articles of Confederation gave most of the power to the states. However, the Federalists wanted the national government to hold the majority of the power and not the states. They were in favor of limiting the power of the states. They did not believe a Bill of Rights was necessary because the state constitutions should protect the individual rights. Federalists believed that the best way to protect their rights was through a large republic.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American Revolution Dbq

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Two groups that played a key role were Federalists and Anti-Federalists. Federalists believed in having a strong central government, whereas Anti-Federalists waned the majority of the power given to the people and were wary of the government having too much control. These groups are similar to Authoritarians and Libertarians of today’s society, respectively. In fact, these group’s differing beliefs sparked one of the disagreements surrounding the Constitution, “One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federalists are who instated the foundation for what our country is. Both the Federalists and Anti-Federalists had an opinions on how the nation should exist. However, the ideals of each group conflicted on multiple levels. Originally, the first draft for a constitution was established by the Articles of Confederation in 1778 (Kramnick, pg155). This was a document to draft laws for the newly independent states.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the American Revolution where they fought for the independence of the United States. The important people who believed in different things separated themselves apart to two different political parties the Federalist and Anti-Federalist. The first was The Federalist a party who believed in a strong national government who live in the rural area. The second group is the Anti-Federalist they opposed a big government, but they did believe in state rights who live in the countryside. Although some may argue that during the 18th century both groups had some similarities with government but in reality they had opposing views of how to run the country between big government that would help more people or states running on their own that might…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists needed to keep our legislature as seems to be, which would imply that we would fundamentally be a government. Doing this would cause threatening vibe toward the administration. The Federalists had confidence in a solid focal government. They needed the Constitution confirmed promptly, simply the way it was. They needed a portion of the forces expelled from the states and given to the focal government.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would allow for the government to do things that aren't listed within the Constitution. The Anti-Federalists were opposed to this. They wanted a strict interpretation of the Constitution. Some examples of Anti-Federalists are George Mason and John Hancock. Anti-Federalists by definition are a political party that wanted the power of the individual state to be greater than the power of the central government, and a strict interpretation of the constitution promoted this.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays