Similarities Between Federalist And Anti Federalists

The New Constitution The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists had a strictly opposing views about how the people should play in the government. Most of the time, it is the Anti-Federalists are the ones that keeps finding the flaws within the new government, they believed that liberty cannot be attained when people are being ruled by wealthy class men. On the other side, Federalists do not want the ordinary people to become “too” involved in the government, they believe that the people should embrace how the system is going to work which they should “surrender” their power to the republic government. There are also similarities present between the two, both do not promise equal powers, but instead, they wanted the trust of the public. According to James Madison, “Complaints are everywhere..” Which means that people can never get enough of everything, and there will be always an opposition present on either minority or majority. Two methods of cure are possible, first is removing the cause of the problem and next is, …show more content…
He believes that if the government will be given “power to make all laws” it will serve as a barrier for the people to achieve liberty-- if that’s what they wanted. And even though government power is limited, they could still abuse their powers. For instance, Brutus claims that the government have “The power to lay taxes unlimited, as to the amount they may require” That as a rule will rather benefit the government itself, than contribute for the betterment of the public. It is evident that Brutus is against the formation of the new government, for it may pose “danger” and “corruption” in the United States. What Brutus advises is, people should be satisfied to those who represent them, those who wants the “good of the community”, and not to choose the ones who might corrupt the