Similarities Between Alexander The Great And Julius Caesar

Good Essays
Two of the greatest leader known to man who conquered all that they say before themselves. Julius Caesar the man who single handedly brought fear to hearts of any who dared oppose him and nearly conquered the world and Alexander the Great the man who conquered most of the known world. They are both major historical figure and brilliant tactical masterminds. Alexander and Julius are easily the most influential figures before the time of christ. Alexander the Great and Julius were both charamistac conqueror who were respects and left behind a legacy so great it is remembered thousands of years in the future. Alexander and Julius also built two of the greatest empires known to man. They also were both probably megalomaniacs and definitely had an ego problems. They also have probably some of the most notable military tactics and battles they won. They also caused massive power rifts after their deaths leading to civil wars. However, even with all of their similarities they were still two very different people in many respects. Alexander the Great was considered to be the height of the Greek Empire as he spread hellenistic influence through most of the world. He was, however he wanted to earn the local people’s trust and influence. So when he conquered an area he encouraged …show more content…
Alexander let his accomplishments go to his head and none could fill the shoes he left. Whereas Julius made sure someone could replace him and helped his people no matter what he lost. Even if he was brutal to his enemies he did it to establish a lasting glory to those he cared for. Alexander may have conquered much, but he could not hold it due to his ego. Julius also was willing to do whatever it took to secure his power and stepped on more than a few toes in the process. In the end Julius Caesar was better as he built an empire through might and secured it with such rather than trying to make peace with

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Julius Caesar transformed Rome from a growing empire into a mighty empire. Throughout many battles, many affairs and many risks, Caesar became one of the most feared leaders in history. He had other leaders running away from him or trying to take him down for many years, and no foreign leaders accomplished their goal. Caesar was not only strong in a military sense, he was one of the smartest leaders as well. Julius Caesar was a successful leader because he knew how to manage his power and popularity, he handled foreign policy very well, and he knew how to show his strengths.…

    • 2006 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Military leaders hold the soul of the soldiers, it’s up to them to keep morale high and keep the Soldiers fierce. One thing I can’t understand about the Roman Empire is why they decided to make their empire, so massive. The empire grew to be so vast and spread out, it was just too big to maintain. The Roman Empire ended up collapsing on itself because of its sheer size. Too much power only leads to self-destruction, history has shown us this repeatedly.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yet he was a great leader because he fought wars head on, he was not afraid of battle and his desire to do good matched no other. I think what most affected King David as a leader was his connection to G-d, his focus on leadership, and wanting to understand his…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Yes! The conquests he went on/the wars he fought, his achievements, and his legacy (Hellenistic Age) all contribute to the great person that he is remembered as today. Additionally, Alexander possessed the characteristics of what it means to be great; he was a courageous, intelligent, creative, disciplined, and integrous leader with remarkable achievement. Alexander had all of these! Although Alexander is criticized for his cruelty, one can confidently say that Alexander the Great was great and his cruelty was a result of a burning desire to his empire.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Alexander the Great’s empire was the most successful military force of any Ancient Mediterranean civilization. From Alex’s battle tactics and doing new, maybe even crazy, things to win all the way to him conquering the vast majority of the known world and it’s civilizations. Even more than those things though is his cultural influence after his…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Still, the balance of power was impossible to maintain and soon began a series of civil wars that tore Rome apart, and in the end, it was Augustus who won and became Emperor of Rome in all but name. Augustus was a bright and ambitious leader, and learned much from the history of his father and to make sure not to repeat it, he gained power not only through one front but many by mollifying the senate and ruling classes by imposing laws that lessened the traditions of the roman republic and to win the people of Rome, he worked to improve over their grand city. He worked through the process of the senate rather than fighting against it like is great uncle had, so that he would he have the full support of his people. Also, unlike Caesar’s way of appointing military leaders, as senate members, Augustus appointed people who were government officials and governors to these powerful positions. Through the…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Isaac Lati Professor David Sage Classical culture essay Is that Alexander or Achilles…wait I’m confused? Alexander was not some ordinary guy at his time. People considered him to be a legend of his time and on. His power was outstanding. Alexander had enough power to almost conquer most of the world at his time.…

    • 935 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There were many great military leaders in the ancient world, but none left a legacy like Macedonia’s Philip II, known simply as Philip of Macedon. Philip was the son of King Amyntas III born around 380 BC. After his father’s death, Philip became the leader in 359 BC (Biography.com). Being equally as famous for fathering Alexander III, affectionately known as Alexander the Great, Philip was a cunning strategist and commander conquering much of Greece. His diplomatic skills coupled with his army’s military might made Philip a nearly unstoppable force.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On his monuments he depicted himself, his wives, and his kids. Ramses is also known for being a military genius. The website ancient-egypt-online states, “Ramses II's army was 100,000 men strong, enormous for that period in time.” One of his most famous battles was the Battle of Kadesh in 1274 B.C. against the Hittites. During this battle he made an important tactical mistake, splitting his army and ending the battle in a tie.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Julius Caesar was an ambitious dictator who lived from 100 B.C.E. - 44 B.C.E. Throughout his life, he held many titles, from being a soldier to a politician, although eventually he became the dictator perpetuum. The Julian calendar was his most memorable legacy, which he invented. His brutal murder on the Ides of March signaled the end of his powerful rule in Rome.…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays