Silverthorne Luber Case Analysis

Decent Essays
An expansion of the exclusionary standard set up in Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States, 251 U.S. 385 (1920). This doctrine holds that evidence gathered with the assistance of illegally obtained information must be excluded from trial. In this manner, if an unlawful cross examination prompts the discovery of physical proof, both the cross examination and the physical confirmation may be barred, the cross examination in view of the exclusionary principle, and the physical proof in light of the fact that it is the "organic product" of the illicit cross examination. This regulation is liable to three of essential special cases. The proof won't be avoided

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ndeumeni further avers that the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude the testimony of Kemogne’s witnesses where Kemogne failed to adequately disclose the witnesses and the contents of their testimony in discovery. Maryland Rule 2-433(a) bestows upon the trial court broad discretion in remedying discovery violations. Md. Rule 2-433(a). Critically, Rule 2-433(a) employs a permissive, but not mandatory, “may” where the rule provides that “the court . .…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Daubert standard is the best choice for determining the admissibility of forensic evidence and expert witnesses in Florida based on the articles provided. The evidence and expert witness testimony that is put forth in Florida litigation should be assessed by the same standards that apply for all rules of evidence in federal courts. Although the Frye standard provides a wide scope as to what can be used as evidence, a stricter set of standards would be more beneficial to the public because it would assure litigants that the science has been proven to be reliable. Frye is based more on the opinion of other experts in the field and what is accepted.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eric Lander Case Summary

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Finally, human error and DNA contamination is a huge concern for ALL free individual’s DNA. Eric Lander in 1990 founded a new center for Genome research at Whitehead, as well as, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Eric Lander has been an expert advisor for the defense on many cases. From Lander’s first hand personal experiences as an expert witness on various court cases, he felt compelled to express his observations of the flaws with DNA fingerprinting identification. Lander’s stated, (1989)…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Contacting Silverthorne Attorneys is a Wise Choice Once you decide to stay local and pursue “DHS” legal counsel to help you with your path of recuperation and financial recovery, you should discuss your damages with a few different legal teams. You want to feel very comfortable with with the team you hire as further communication is extremely important. The team of professional lawyers, paralegals, and staff, plus hired experts and investigators here at Silverthorne Attorneys will overwhelmingly convince you that we should be the unwavering advocates for you and your case. Contact us today, cost-free, so an injury attorney can evaluate your unfortunate experience and begin a positive, expedient journey to recovery. When we are hired, and…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overview 1. Forensic Evidence 1: Frye V. United States, Citation ___ (ORSDEL, 1923) Frye had been found guilty of the second-degree murder. His legal representative desired the court to hear the proof of the scientist who had formerly performed as a systolic blood pressure sham test which he said would make his client by verifying he was telling the fact.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The expenses of applying the exclusionary principle on habeas were nearly incredible. We contemplated that doing as such would not just reject solid proof and occupy consideration from the focal inquiry of blame, however would likewise interfere with general society interest. Rule of Law: The Court of Appeals affirmed the District’s Court ruling. Reference: Withrow v. Williams, 507 U.S. 680, 680, 113 S. Ct. 1745, 1747, 123 L. Ed.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Da Vs Harris Case Study

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Police officers did not have the right to approach the porch of Jardines’ house to find evidence, this is know as exclusionary rule,improperly gathered evidence may not be introduce in a criminal…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    cases also relates to the Fourth Amendment, which requires "search and seizure" of evidence, also known as the exclusionary rule (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). The exclusionary rule states that, “Evidence must be collected and analyzed without violating the rights of the defendant; if the rights of the defendant are violated, then the evidence will not be upheld in court” (Srinivas, 2012, p. 179). Savana Redding is a 13-year-old eighth grader enrolled at Safford Middle School. She is an honor student who has no history of disciplinary problems or substance abuse.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Merritt Vs Dillard

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages

    P. 56(c). While the Court must view inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, “this does not lessen the burden of the non-moving party in any way.” Rollins v. TechSouth, Inc., 833 F.2d 1525, 1528 (11th Cir. 1987). Thus, the nonmovant still bears the burden of providing “sufficient evidence” for every element she must prove. Id. (Citing…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elizabeth, I do concede that Dripps model of the contingent exclusionary rule is fascinating; yet, it is my opinion that there are pros and cons. It is without doubt that the present exclusionary rule is controversial. I also concede that there isn’t a need to completely re-invent the wheel. Conversely, Dripps argues in regards of the contingent suppression order in which prosecutors would have to choose between accepting exclusion of evidence obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment obtained through infractions of the Fourth Amendment or accepting the imposition of a damages judgment against the state under an administration of statutory damages (Tipton, 2010).…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A woman voluntarily interviewed with police detectives while other officers executed a search warrant at her home. Upon learning of this at the end of the interview, two detectives were unsure if they should let her go. The woman contends that these factors together rendered the interview a custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings thus making her statements inadmissible. A court would likely find, however, that the woman was never in custody because she was never under formal arrest or an equivalent to formal arrest.…

    • 1316 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Overbey v Poteat The following is the Case Summary of Overbey v Poteat. In 1960, the petitioner Overbey commenced this suit in the Sessions Court of Williamson County against the respondent Poteat to recover damages to his automobile, resulting from a collision between the plaintiff's automobile and a black Angus steer owned by the defendant which was loose on the highway. There was a judgment in favor of the defendant in the Sessions Court, the Circuit Court and in the Court of Appeals successively. Poteat”s evidence is as followed.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Supreme Court case, Nelson v. Colorado, the judgment revolves around the constitutionality of the Colorado Exoneration Act. This act stated that monetary fines paid due to conviction charges can only be returned to the exonerated individual if they can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that they are innocent of the accused crime. The constitutionality of this law was debated and in question in regards to the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution. I concur in the recent Supreme Court decision that the Colorado Exoneration Act should be ruled as unconstitutional. I am in assent with this recent decision that the current Colorado law is unconstitutional because it violates the Fourteenth Amendment, which protects United States citizen’s right to a fair trial, undermines the legitimacy and authority of a criminal court proceeding, and also contradicts the precedent established in various courts that…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 1: Discuss the arguments for and against the exclusionary rule. Be sure to provide examples and explain your position on the exclusionary rule. Answer: The exclusionary rule is “A judicial rule that makes evidence obtained in violation of the U.S. Constitution, state, or federal laws, or court rules inadmissible” (Gardner & Anderson, 2016, p. 214).…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frye Case Study

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This use of the Frye standard determines if the evidence or scientific testimony is generally acceptable in the scientific community. The Frye standard was used to prove that the peoples motion to use the scientific testimony for the lab tests conducted from the samples taking from the defendants watch was not admissible because of the unaccepted methods used by the scientists who had conducted the Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid test. This use of the Frye standard in the court case allowed the defendant to make what would have been very strong and determining evidence not admissible in court. This is just one example on how court standards can be the deciding factor in many court cases. The use of the Frye Standard in this case had a huge effect on whether the defendant could be charged guilty or not guilty.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays