At present, the world’s populace is significantly larger than it was during Malthus’ lifetime; yet because of expanding agricultural technology and advancements in global medical care and general socioeconomic well-being, there have been no dramatic population checks, on a relative scale, since the Industrial Revolution. Therefore, while Malthus’ theory has been the catalyst for most all subsequent study of population (e.g., Darwinism, Neo-Malthusianism), in its totality, it is unfit to fully describe modern population dynamics as our current productive capacity and societal progress is great enough to prevent severe strain on the present population
At present, the world’s populace is significantly larger than it was during Malthus’ lifetime; yet because of expanding agricultural technology and advancements in global medical care and general socioeconomic well-being, there have been no dramatic population checks, on a relative scale, since the Industrial Revolution. Therefore, while Malthus’ theory has been the catalyst for most all subsequent study of population (e.g., Darwinism, Neo-Malthusianism), in its totality, it is unfit to fully describe modern population dynamics as our current productive capacity and societal progress is great enough to prevent severe strain on the present population