Sigmund Freud Moral Induction Theory

760 Words 4 Pages
After much reading and re-exploring the various theories one person remained constant for this application, Sigmund Freud.
Being a fan of Carl Jung and finding disappointment in Freud for ending their friendship due to differences of theory. Then, the uncomfortableness of Freud’s thoughts about the psychosexual stages of children gave cause for rethinking possible biasing due to personal experiences. Therefore, the query within is: How can a professional of the MIND, personality, and behavior ignore a child’s cry: Then, explain away the possibilities of said abuse, freeing the perpetrators, and jailing the victim for such thoughts or accusations?
A most unfortunate time for Jung, that Freud would discredit his expansion of human behavior and personality (Friedman & Schustack, 2012). Common knowledge is that all theoretical arguments build upon one another, then expand according to the theorist’s perception, culture, personal and professional experiences, and academics knowledge (e.g.). And-while, Freud’s philosophy of psychosexual stages and development are Law: Respectfully, one might suggest there was a cover-up for the heinous crimes committed against
…show more content…
Most often the Moral Seduction Theory relates to criminal behavior and crime causation and the “Self-fulfilling prophecy effect is a fallacy of one’s fears coming true” (p.106). Deliberate or unintentional, individuals who neglect his or her professional responsibilities based upon faulty thinking, results in his or her ethical decision-making and problem-solving skills decreasing. While fear, anxiety and biasing increases, due to the implied future business creditors, investors, and client terminations, public opinions and the opinions of other colleagues and professionals in his or her field

Related Documents