After being blinded Gloucester states, “I have no way and therefore want no eyes. I stumbled when I saw. Full oft ’tis seen Our means secure us, and our mere defects Prove our commodities. O dear son Edgar, The food of thy abusèd father’s wrath, Might I but live to see thee in my touch, I’d say I had eyes again.”(Act 4, Line 207) Through this Shakespeare is creating a contrast between Gloucester and King Lear. Though Gloucester is physically blind, he is able to see the truth more than King Lear can with his sight. By being blinded physically, Gloucester was able to see past the superficiality of people and see the truth in their actions and words. Gloucester himself states that he was less aware when he had his sight by saying, "I stumbled when I saw." Much like King Lear, Gloucester was also blinded by the actions of his children, and was unable to see their true intentions. It was not until he was blinded that he saw the truth in the situation. King Lear is unable to recognize his own ignorance and see the deceitful nature of others, while Gloucester achieves a newfound sense of vision when he was physically
After being blinded Gloucester states, “I have no way and therefore want no eyes. I stumbled when I saw. Full oft ’tis seen Our means secure us, and our mere defects Prove our commodities. O dear son Edgar, The food of thy abusèd father’s wrath, Might I but live to see thee in my touch, I’d say I had eyes again.”(Act 4, Line 207) Through this Shakespeare is creating a contrast between Gloucester and King Lear. Though Gloucester is physically blind, he is able to see the truth more than King Lear can with his sight. By being blinded physically, Gloucester was able to see past the superficiality of people and see the truth in their actions and words. Gloucester himself states that he was less aware when he had his sight by saying, "I stumbled when I saw." Much like King Lear, Gloucester was also blinded by the actions of his children, and was unable to see their true intentions. It was not until he was blinded that he saw the truth in the situation. King Lear is unable to recognize his own ignorance and see the deceitful nature of others, while Gloucester achieves a newfound sense of vision when he was physically