Mental Illness: A Brief Summary And Analysis

Improved Essays
Mental illness has become a serious issue affecting an abundance of people all across the United States. According to NAMI: National Alliance on Mental Illness, 43.8 million adults experience some type of mental illness, and 10 million adults experience a severe mental disorder affecting their day to day life. Mental disorders affect more than the individuals with the disease, but the friends and families taking care of them as well. Over the years, scientists have developed a variety of medications to help patients suffering with mental disorders. However, with these medications can come unpleasant side effects, resulting in patients not wanting to take their medication. Someone who’s mentally incompetent and causes no harm to themselves …show more content…
For example, Oliver Sacs refers to the drug haloperidol, and how it can dramatically reduce the symptoms of Tourette’s. However, while certain medications drastically reduce the symptoms. The side effects produced by these medications cause the patient to feel dreadful. For instance, in the article “A Surgeons Life” Oliver Sacs talks regarding a man named Bennett, who was diagnosed with Tourette syndrome, Bennett had been prescribed the drug haloperidol to moderate his severe case of Tourette’s. While on medication Bennett’s symptoms were under control, however, he no longer felt himself. Bennett described the side effects as being dreadful. Furthermore, forcing medication to an incompetent person who’s not a danger to themselves or society should not be our right. Only the patient truly knows how the medication makes them feel, and if they feel they’re happier living with their symptoms compared to dealing with the side effects of their medication. Hence, they should be allowed to refuse treatment. Overall, the patient should have the right to dictate what goes on with their body, and if they refuse medication advise them to seek out alternative treatments that don’t require …show more content…
With that being said, a mentally incompetent person who causes no harm to himself or others should have the right to refuse medication for his condition. Forcing someone to take their medication for several different reasons. When forcing a patient to take his medication is the welfare of the patient truly the main priority? Or is the medication being used to make the patient easier to manage. Secondly, it should be the patients right to dictate whether or not medication should be used. Only the patient truly knows how they feel on or off the medication, and if they believe the side effects of the medication are worst then the symptoms of their condition, then they have the right to decide their method of treatment. Lastly, patients should be given the opportunity to seek out alternative treatments for their mental illness. Whether that means trying different types of medications, or testing alternative methods which doesn’t require any form of medication. As seen earlier, there are alternative methods that have helped control the symptoms experienced by patients with severe mental disorders. Therefore, further research should be done to seek out these alternative treatments, in order to, help those who refuse medication. In conclusion, I’m not arguing to stop the treatment of mental

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mental Health System Fault

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to the Mental Health America 18.19 percent is the “percentage of US adults suffering from a form of mental illness” (Adult Population). That percent can also be transformed to mean that “there are about 40 million people in the United States with a mental illness” (“How the Mental Health System Struggles”). The system cannot haddle that amount of patients as a result “the number of persons with SMI seen in hospital emergency departments […] incressed form 5.4% of total visits in 2000 to 12.5% in 2007[…] [and] the average wait time for psychiatric admission in general hospitals is currently more than 18 hours, compared with just under six hours for non-psychiatric admissions” (Teich). These startling statics show how this system need to be reformed to properly care for the plethora of patients. This flood of patients and that cannot receive treatment promptly can be catastrophic. People who suffer badly enough to go to the hospital for mental illness are a risk to themselves and others. The inadequacy of the system to handle the large volume of patients result in death which is not acceptable.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mental illness is a serious health condition that requires treatment. No matter how capable an individual may feel about managing the issue alone, many problems can arise as a result of leaving such a condition untreated. In numerous cases, individuals who suffer from mental illness remain unaware that they are mentally ill. However, according to the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI), millions of Americans are afflicted with a mental health condition. In fact, NAMI asserts that one in five adults experiences this issue within a given year. Additionally, 10 million adult Americans face serious mental illness in a year, and over 20 percent of youths between the ages of 13 and 18 experience a severe mental…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reliance on medication to fix it and a legislation to facilitate adherence, coercion seems to be a normative intervention that is crippling to service users. There is one view, which asserts that as a society we have a duty to care and protect individual, the community at large, therefore the necessary measures should be used to get help to those who need it whether they recognized that help is needed or not (). There is another view that believes there is a need to work toward solutions that are more effective and potentially less harmful while upholding individual dignity autonomy (). Despite years of discourse and the evolved understanding on rights, choice and consumer autonomy the core of contention remains the same. Consumers are inherently coerced to agree on treatment that is not decided by them this. There are negatives outcomes that are associated with this, which can include: future treatment avoidance; mistrust of the system and decreased future help-seeking behavior…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that a patient has a right to this option under patient autonomy. Also, under this law the patient maintains their right to their life. They pick and choose when their limits are versus their only option being to push until they can’t be pushed anymore, ending with a possible outcome of surviving their disease. However in most of these cases they are terminal disease. I can see why this issue would be controversial because it’s going completely against the ethics of a caregiver, however in many cases like these the care giver can’t give effective treatment. So instead of placing a patient through an extremely tiring amount of multiple therapeutic treatments or a possible onset of depression and stress from the therapy, this can be avoided. The physician can unintentionally take away the patients right by enforcing their ethical standards and not the patients. No one person can feel how another person is feeling and though ones position or outlook is for the greater good all emotions and feelings are subjective to that person. Also, not everybody wants to spend their time worrying about something they know is already out of their control. PAS gives the patient control over their life and they determine when they can no longer handle their situation. Choices need to still be an option for patients and the patients right to choice can often be over looked again when cure or stabilizing is the end goal by a physician, while the process is…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a person has a right to life, liberty, and happiness, then an individual should have the freedom to make important decisions regarding his/her life. Everyone has a right to life which means that a person’s right to live should be protected. If a patient who is terminally ill and mentally competent no longer wants to live, then the patient’s right to receive assisted suicide should be protected. Others should not interfere with a person’s right to make that decision because they would be disrespecting a person’s freedom. Moreover, patients have the right to not receive any medical treatment, and a patient can decide not to receive any treatment even if the treatment can save the person’s life. By not receiving any treatment a patient, who…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Medication Therapies

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I feel that individuals should consider the possible side effects before taking medications for their mental illnesses. There are many side effects to drugs and it is crucial to be aware of them before taking a handful of pills. There are many different therapies that I would look into before taking medication. Medication can be a successful treatment for various mental illnesses, but there are therapies that could do as well if not better without potential side effects. For severe cases of schizophrenia and depression, many need medications to even function in this world. I do feel though that all other options should be thoroughly examined and thought about before taking medication for a mental disability.…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In today’s world there are so many different articles, books, and even televised new reports surrounding the seriousness of mental illnesses and how to approach it, especially because these mental illnesses are affecting not only the particular person’s life, but also the lives of others. There has been conversation and strong arguments from both sides concerning the tough question of weather medicine should be forced on the mentally ill or not. Although there has been serious conversation around this topic, how do we know if all of these different sources are credible? Can we trust them? Robert Whitaker has added to the conversation with an article written for The Boston Globe on June 9, 2002 titled “Forced Medication is Inhumane: Should The…

    • 166 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not often that someone must be treated involuntarily. This occurs when “individuals have little or no awareness of their illness, i.e., they have anosognosia, and when they are not being treated with medication, they become dangerous to themselves or others” (What Is the Effect of Involuntary Medication on Individuals with Serious Mental Illness 1) Typically, being committed to a mental facility is followed by a diagnosis and prescription to control whatever disorder an individual may have. This diagnosis and treatment could potentially save the individual's life, as well as others that he or she may have harmed while untreated (Ward 263). The American people, however, are split on whether or not there are legitimate grounds for involuntary commitment. Those who support the practice of involuntary commitment are called “Paternalists” (Ward 263). These people believe that commitment to a mental facility is in the best interest of the individual.This group is comprised of mental health professionals, law enforcement…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People suffering from mental disorders have to be treated as persons with autonomy just like other citizens. However, this is a relatively new dimension since they have always been treated as incompetent in making decisions including treatment before the eyes of the law. Today laws protect them from involuntary treatment unless sanctioned by a court of law under specific circumstances.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Everyone has the right to exercise their rights. For example, we have the freedom of speech, we have the rights to our voice and opinion. With the mentally ill, they cannot be forced to take medications if they do not want to. With Mike’s case, when Pete Early was talking to Officer Albert, the officer said, “Listen, even though your son has broken into a house, unless you tell the medical personnel inside that he’s threatened to kill you, they aren’t going to treat him. We’ll end up takin him to jail, and you don’t want that to happen. You don’t want him in jail in his mental condition” (Early, 2007, p. 22). Mike has the right to refuse to take his medications; however, if he chooses not to it could lead to his death. While making his rounds at the jail, Dr. Poitier stopped to talk to a prisoner. He asked, “Will you take medicine today if I prescribe it for you, Mr. Boreman? The prisoner glared at Dr. Poitier and napped, ‘I’ve already answered that damn question seventeen times: No, no, no, no, no,-‘” (Early, 2007, p. 49). The mentally ill have the same rights as the rest of us do. Because of these rights, it may be harmful to…

    • 2203 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consider the case of a seriously ill, but potentially curable patient. The patient has a disease which may be cured if the patient were to undergo extensive and exhaustive treatment. He or she may live the next year or so with a quite poor quality of life, and the treatment may still not save their life. If the patient were to refuse treatment, some may say that it would be just to coerce this person into receiving treatment because it may save their life. It is wrong to force people to do something which they have not chosen, even if you believe the outcome is in their best interest. A reasonable person has an inherent right to do what they decide is in their own best interest, given that it does not harm others. This patient may have decided that if there is a fair chance they may die from their disease, they would rather have the chance to live out that remaining time with what health they have left. This is a personal decision which should only be made by that…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This article focuses on the families ' experiences of mental illness rather than the individual. Boschman explains that having an external party that has seen everything first hand is beneficial in the diagnosis process (2007). LeFrancois and Diamond would note that this actually delegitimizes the individual 's experiences as the individual cannot make sense of their experience for themselves because family members ' accounts are taken as truth (2014). This could also be because 'mentally ill ' individuals are often seen as not being able to take care of themselves. Both articles talk about the framework of performance, where a culturally dominant discourse that is biomedical is a produced effect that is shaped, formed, and reproduced within…

    • 1186 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Patient Self-Determination

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A few patients guarantee a "privilege" to any therapeutic administration that they feel can advantage them, and regularly doctors are just excessively eager, making it impossible to oblige, notwithstanding when they are persuaded that the administration can offer no health advantage for the tolerant 's condition. This issue is particularly genuine in circumstances where assets are restricted and giving "purposeless" or "nonbeneficial" medicines to a few patients implies that different patients are left untreated.…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Patient autonomy is the right of patients to make decisions regarding their medical care, without the exertion of any undue external influence (Cowley). Physicians express respect for the autonomy of patients by allowing them to make decisions regarding their medication, sometimes, even when these decisions contradict their professional medical advice. . A patient’s verdict regarding his medical care, for as long as he is of sound mind, is traditionally the highest precedence in American bioethics. This emphasis protects patients from being coerced or manipulated, especially by medical professionals or by their trusted loved ones (Cowley). From the case study of Mr. Jones, the patient complains of the discomfort…

    • 941 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When it comes to medical treatments I am all for people having the right to refuse treatments if they wish to do so, but I also believe that there are exceptions to the rule. I believe that TB and psych. patients are examples of those exceptions.…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays