Robin Hood has rebranded the poor as the needy. Similarly, the upper class does not necessarily consist of only those born with a silver spoon in their mouth or the ambitious who obtained their wealth on the backs of others, but also of risk-takers who profited well and entrepreneurs who attained their wealth through hard work and self-sacrifice. Robin Hood has demonized the wealthy. Danneskjöld holds Robin Hood up to be the “foulest of creatures—the double-parasite who lives on the sores, of the poor and the blood of the rich.” The reverence that the common people bestow on Robin Hood is misguided because his charitable giving comes, not from his own benevolence, but by forcefully making others pay for his
Robin Hood has rebranded the poor as the needy. Similarly, the upper class does not necessarily consist of only those born with a silver spoon in their mouth or the ambitious who obtained their wealth on the backs of others, but also of risk-takers who profited well and entrepreneurs who attained their wealth through hard work and self-sacrifice. Robin Hood has demonized the wealthy. Danneskjöld holds Robin Hood up to be the “foulest of creatures—the double-parasite who lives on the sores, of the poor and the blood of the rich.” The reverence that the common people bestow on Robin Hood is misguided because his charitable giving comes, not from his own benevolence, but by forcefully making others pay for his