Right To Die

Improved Essays
Should the right to die be an option for those who are terminal? There gets to be a certain point when even the toughest pain meds and strongest drugs just do not cut it. In rare cases like these, do individuals have the autonomy to make the decision to end one’s life?

The right to die is a moral principle that is based on beliefs that one has the right to undergo a voluntary euthanasia. Now many would argue that the right to die only harms one’s self, or would fall under an Ulitarian attitude. However, suicide has long term effects on those around you, such as friends, family, spouse or children. But watching a person deteriorate because of a sickness could do synonymous damage.

As an individual the impact is quite simple; they have the
…show more content…
In Oregon, she decided that this would be the best decision for her family and her. She used her illness and the media to get funding in the support or legalizing the Death with Dignity law in the states that it was currently still illegal in. Brittany Maynard said “I’m choosing to suffer less. To put myself and my family through less pain.”(Caplan.)

The argument asks if this is truly ethical. This permits doctor to assist the terminally ill to die on their own terms and some say that we should not be the ones determining that. “God should do so.” When we allow assisted suicides, we set up the poor and disabled to eventually be abused. In Brittany Maynard’s case, she knew she was dying. That was inevitable. But Maynard was fully aware, along with her family that she would die after taking the lethal pills.

A way that might be beneficial in the decision of assisting in suicide would be to have a panel of doctors and psychologists determine that the patient’s decision is 100% the right choice. That way when the patient does decide his or her fate, there are experts and evidence that this is the only way for them to discontinue the suffering. As far as the truth to all this, well that’s quite simple. The truth is regardless of politics, Brittany is not suffering anymore. Whether right or wrong, she was able to make that decision and since her death, man others now

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Americans are taught from an early age that everyone is born with certain unalienable rights. The right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are characterized as legal truths that cannot be taken away or denied. However, one must wonder if the right to life coincides with the right to die. This is the very question that has sparked controversy all throughout the nation regarding physician-assisted suicide (PAS). To clarify, the right to die is a person’s decision to end their life with the medical help and guidance from their doctor.…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Controversy of Physician Assisted Suicide According to the Constitution every person has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The statement means no one needs permission to live and each person has the right to do what make him or her happy even if it means dying (Bowden 36). There are many people throughout the United States that believe Physician Assisted Suicide is wrong, however, there are also many people who believe it is a human right. The controversy of PAS can be understood by learning what it is and where it occurs, why it should be legal, and why it should not be legal.…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical arguments against assisted dying include the possibility of misdiagnosis, the potential availability of new treatments, and conflict with the physician’s role as a healer. Farr Curlin’s study shows 69 percent of U.S. physicians are against physician assisted suicide (Curlin). In an article “Why Physicians Should Oppose Assisted Suicide” Tony Yang says “…with physician-assisted-suicide, the physician is to disregard what is perhaps the most universal moral injunction – do not kill…” Yang uses Brittany Maynard’s case to highlight his opinion that she ended her life prematurely based on her fear of physical pain, self-determination and her wish to avoid dependency. With respect to assisted-suicide, he views “the right to die” as irony for the alleged “right to have a physician help me kill myself” (Yang).…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On November 1st 2014, Brittany Maynard laid in bed surrounded by loved ones. She had chosen this day to drink the fatal dose of medication she was prescribed. She no longer wanted to suffer from head and neck pains, surgeries, seizures, and stroke like symptoms she endured from her terminal brain cancer. She had to leave her home state and make a whole new life in Oregon months prior. She states,” I had to find new physicians, establish residency in Portland, search for a new home, obtain a new driver 's license, change my voter registration and enlist people to take care of our animals, and my husband, Dan, had to take a leave of absence from his job.”…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Physicians-Assisted Suicide be allowed in the United States? Many patients and doctors around the country have debated the right for physicians to assist in patient suicide. Doctors should be allowed to assist in the suicide of terminally ill patients who are suffering and are going to die regardless of the time they have left. Patients should be allowed the right to choose to live or die when cancer or some genetic disease has taken over their body.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death With Dignity: Is it Ethical or Not? Brittany Maynard was a 29 year old young woman with terminal brain tumor that decided to take her own life. Maynard moved to Oregon so she could "die with dignity" which is being assisted in one's death by a physician. People will fall on two sides of this case there are those that support Maynard's decision to die with dignity and others do not support her decision and view it as ethically wrong.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The story of John B. Rehm is a heart breaking one Rehm was a Lawyer who had to go through Parkinson's Disease. Rehm wanted to die to end his pain and suffering in Maryland which at the time did not have any sort of law supporting Right to Die, so his request was rejected just like Quinlan's but for different reason. To Rehm this was a devastating fact and could no longer bear the disease according to Rehm’s wife “Rehm chose to stop eating or drinking until he died several days later, on June 23.” (washingtonpost.com). The thought that John B. Rehm had to go through that disease and getting rejected his hope of ending it is sad on top of that he starved ending up in him suffering far more, his story led to his state debating about the “Right to Die”.…

    • 356 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide Essay Outline I. Introduction - There is a controversial debate throughout the United States for the last decade regarding physician-assisted suicide for terminally ill patients, many believe having a Doctor prescribe a self-administered lethal drug to a patient is diminishing the value of life. While others believe this method should be the patients’ right to choice when the pain and suffering from a life threatening illness should cease. II. Main Point # 1 - Will Physician-…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Physician-Assisted Suicide There is one thing that you can be certain of your entire life; you are going to die. We had no choice to be born, so should we have no choice when we die? Oftentimes we do not even know when we are going to die, in instances such as car accidents or murders. Sometimes we do know, and the death process can be long and drawn out, with pain, suffering, and mountains of medical bills.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Much similar to a family making the difficult decision of pulling the cord, it ultimately benefits the patient and it would be selfish to make their family member go through that. If they are an organ donor their vital organs can be saved and used to save other patients, and the nurse or doctor can move onto another patient that has a chance to live(This sentence is very harsh. Maybe put the health care team can help save another patient who wants to live). Another benefit is health care costs can be reduced. Advocates for physician assisted suicide say that the patients would know that it was their choice and that they were ready to die (Put they say, make it more factual.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should we have the right to die? Do you have the right to die? This sounds morbid and dark and our general gut feeling is saying “of course not”. Why?…

    • 1106 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a person is terminally or chronically ill they should have the right to physician assisted suicide. These ill people who are of sound mind and judgment should have the right to die peacefully and with assistance if this is what they choose to do. The choice should be theirs and they should not have to suffer more than necessary, they should be able to save their family the financial ruin and they should be able to leave this earth is in a dignified manner, free of pain. Jack Kevorkian was a Pathologist who lived in Michigan where assisted suicide was not legal. The fact that it was not legal did not stop him from assisting those in need.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ability to die is inherited by all people at the moment of conception but the legal right to die is a topic most concerning in today’s politics. Andrew D. Sumner, a graduate a Penn State’s College of Medicine in 1990, proposes that individuals should not have the legal right to end their life due to terminal illness or ailment. Approximately 1.2% of American citizens die every year from some form of terminal illness(Guy, Maytal, and Theodore A. Stern 6). Many of those deaths involve excruciating pain from the illness itself and family members suffering over an hourglass that just won 't seem to run out. Denying people the right to chose when they want to pass on their own terms is simply cruel and unjust, not only to the patient, but to the loved ones of the individual.…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The “Right to Die” is this a choice or is this a choice that society should be allowed to make? The controversy over someone choosing to end their life when dealing with a terminal illness with a physician’s help is the rights of the patient and not the right of society to choose. People who are dealing with terminal illness should have a choice to die or not with their doctor’s help. In a physician-assistant suicide the doctor prescribes the medication that will end a patient’s life, but the patient has to be able to take the medication which will result in death.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Benefits Of Euthanasia

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “I’d rather be dead than be in a wheelchair, or need a respirator to help me breathe” ("Right to Die: Should Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide Be Legal). Terminally ill patients often state they’d be better off dead. Euthanasia is a quiet, painless death used for terminally ill patients. Terminally ill patients are those patients who cannot be cured and are already at great risk of dying. Terminally ill patients only have a life expectancy of six months or less.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays