Should The Indians Be Removed From The Plains

Improved Essays
Should the Indians be removed from the plains? This question probably went through the minds of the federal government many times. What helped them to figure out what to do were the Indians terrible choices that started many conflicts. The Indians who lived in the plains brought buffalo near extinction and broke their treaty; which led to many problems between the white folk and the Indians. The Indians in the plains relied on buffalo. They used their dogs to help them hunt, but the Spanish changed that for them. The Spanish introduced horses for hunting which helped the Indians to kill buffalo more rapidly. They became so serious on hunting for buffalo that farmers were made to quit their farms to help hunt. This led to less produce and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Trail Of Tears Dbq Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Based on the documents that I studied and the text of the U.S. Constitution, I disagree with the statement that the U.S. government was justified in forcing the Indian tribes east of the Mississippi River to leave their homeland to move to the Oklahoma territory. I believe that the Natives were cheated out of their land Document One summarizes the uphill battle between the Natives and the settlers. According to Document One, "Land greed was a big reason for the federal government's position on Indian removal." Also, "In 1802, the Georgia legislature signed a compact giving the federal government all of her claims to western lands in exchange for the government's pledge to extinguish all Indian titles to land within the state." and "… the…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated in a speech by a member of the Iroquois Confederacy prior to the war, “Your People daily settle on these Lands… We must insist on your Removing them, as you know they have no Right to settle” (Doc B). Previously allied with the French, who they viewed favorably, the Native Americans were not satisfied under the…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During Indian removals, many Native tribes were attempting to find loopholes in treaties to be able to stay on their native lands. One of the loopholes included gaining permission to stay from the English government. Most of the people who were successful at gaining the exemption were well respected by the English or they claimed they would become civilized Americans. The second option included hiding out and hoping not to be found by the soldiers. Lastly, the Natives could have become members of a community that was exempted from removal.…

    • 355 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “For some Native peoples, the horse still is an essential part of daily life. For others, the horse will always remain an element of our identity and our history. The Horse Nation continues to inspire, and Native artists continue to celebrate the horse in our songs, our stories, and our works of art.” – Emil Her Many Horses Emil Her Many Horses is one of the many curators at the Smithsonian Institution in Washington D.C. More specifically, he is the curator in the Museum Scholarship at the National Museum of the American Indian.…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Indian removal movement of 1830 started because Americans were moving west and acquiring land to settle, but the Indians became the obstacle. Another factor that made the Americans to remove the Cherokees was, because of the gold that Georgians had found in Cherokee’s land. The government would make treaties, but the government would not fully follow the treaties. While the Americans moved west, they introduced diseases, but this was not enough to wipe out the tribes, war was the answer. It was not until Congress passed the Indian Removal Act of 1830 that it allowed to move Indians further west that became a real problem for the tribes.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The discovery of the Americas lead to a global trade network of manufactured goods and agricultural produce being introduced and exchanged, changing the native’s lifestyle. Europeans first introduced the native americans to new produce such as horses, chickens, goats, dogs, grape vines, onions, sugar cane, wheat, and apple trees. Due to this, the lifestyle and diet of a native american had more components. Horses were used as an efficient transportation instead of walking on feet as they did before horses were brought to the Americas. Their staple meal of mainly starch-based foods(potatoes, corn, beans, etc) was introduced with a variety of meat, fruits, and vegetables.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The white settlers had wanted the Native Americans land for farming. Jackson had decided to remove all Native Americans from their land. In 1830 Congress passed the Indian Removal Act, ordering all Native Americans to move west of the Mississippi River. The Five Civilized Tribes consists of The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, Creek, and Chickasaw.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America is a large and populous country with over 300 million people spread out among the states, but it wasn’t always that way. In the 1830s the U.S government was struggling to expand its nation into the frontier. As a result, many people including Andrew Jackson and even Indians like Elias Boudinot found it necessary to move and push the Native Americans west. Jackson strongly believed that the Native Americans should move further west because it will save them from annihilation and will allow white settlers to use and find new land expanding America’s growth (Doc A). This shows how Jackson supported the native American removal because it benefited both people, the Native Americans and white settlers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian Removal: Is it justified? The Act of Removal of the Cherokee Indians was a rough era in history. The Removal of the Indians happened because the citizens of Georgia wanted to mine on their land. The Cherokee Indians had refused to let them mine on their land because the land belonged to the legally and they were not going to let some strangers come and take their land away from them. How would you like it if someone came into your house and told you to leave?…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Indian Removal Act, which was passed by Congress in 1830, completely changed the path for the future in multiple aspects. In determining what impact this event still has on our country today, one must start by analyzing the relationships between Native Americans, the United States government, and the common white settler. Additionally, one must analyze how the removal of these tribes affected not only them, but the white settlers. Socially, Native Americans were viewed as no more than objects in the way of what the Americans viewed as rightfully theirs.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indian removal was a policy of the United States government in the 19th century whereby Native Americans were forcibly removed from their ancestral homelands in the eastern United States to lands west of the Mississippi River, thereafter known as Indian Territory. That policy has been characterized by some scholars as part of a long-term genocide of Native Americans[1] by European settlers to North America in the colonial period and citizens of the United States until the mid-20th century.[2][3] The policy traced its direct origins to the administration of James Monroe, though it addressed conflicts between whites and Indians that had been occurring since the 17th century, and were getting worse by the early 19th century as white settlers were…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The indian removal act of 1830 was justified and the cherokees should've moved because they had done horrible things to people, better land, and freedom. The first reason, the cherokees should’ve moved is because they have done horrible…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natives land was constantly being settled on, their livestock stolen, even their villages burned to the ground by the European American Settlers. By signing with the Indian Removal Act, the indigenous peoples were given an opportunity to get away from the violence and discrimination of the settlers. The Indian Removal Act gave the Native Americans a means of survival, thus benefitting the Native Americans and saving many lives that may have been lost on both the European American and the Native American sides had the Native Americans remained on their homeland.            The Native American Tribes were offered land west of the Mississippi River that they would have total sovereignty over. President Andrew Jackson was given the legal right by the Indian Removal Policy to grant the land west of the Mississippi River to the Native Americans for them alone to govern over to the tribes that did agree to give up their ancestral homelands. Most of the European American population believed that America would never expand beyond the Mississippi River, so the Native American Tribes would be safe from the settlers heading west to create their homes on the new…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Plains Indians life had already taken a drastic change by the introduction of horses. When settlers were first migrating west, they had little trouble with the Indians, and even traded with them for supplies. However, when more people started to migrate, that is when the fight began. The army moved in and fought with the Indians.…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of specific accounts, while individually could be disregarded as anomalies from the general “ecological Indian”, collectively, describe a variety of cultures each with their own pressures and resources. On the plains, communities revolved around the buffalo because of the abundance and relative ease in hunting it, however, fires, drought, preference for cows as opposed to bulls, competition from horses and the consumer market brought by the colonizers placed strain on the communities and their main resource until it was all but depleted (Krech 138-141). In the south, deer was an important resource similar in value to the plains buffalo alongside agriculture and gathering (Krech, 154). However, similar to the narrative in the plains, with the introduction of the consumer market, hunting outside of basic need became common, reducing population sizes faster than they could recover and forcing longer travel for successful hunts which resulted in increased interactions with other tribes leading to a higher reliance on guns for conflicts meaning the tribes had to collect more hides to purchase these weapons (Krech, 158-161). Even in the example of the Piegan tribe, who “paid little attention to the trade until just before the annual trip to the post” (Krech 142), which the author uses to contend that the consumer market colonizers brought to…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays