Should the Government Have a Right to Regulate Food?
Today in America, more and more people are becoming overweight and obese. Obesity is becoming a major problem in the United States. According to Melissa Abramotivs, the author of “Obesity” more than fifty million people in the United States weigh over one fifth of their body’s ideal weight (Abramotivs 2). Studies from “Nutrition and Weight Management” states that nine out of twenty adult women and one out of four adult men are trying to lose weight. The eating habits of American citizens are starting to get out of control. In the United States, adults are gaining excess weight, children are beginning to eat more, and the prices of healthy foods are increasing. So should the government regulate …show more content…
Also, the government should regulate food because the cost of both public and private health insurance and healthcare would drop drastically. By restricting food, fast food restaurants would serve better and healthier choices (Baskt). On the other hand, the government should not regulate food because it raids the people’s right to public and private right of freedom. By restricting food, government would spend way more money by focusing on one problem. The restriction of food would increase the food prices from restaurants to stores all over in order to meet the government’s standards. Ultimately, food restrictions would cause unemployment, business failures, closing of restaurants, and lesser competition (Kiel). The government wants to keep people protected and make life better. Therefore, they should have the right to regulate what one person consumes.
The problem of obesity is not just about food; it is about an entire lifestyle. Many people today are fighting the war against obesity, and they are fighting vigorously to win. But by investing into each one’s life today, eating healthy, hiring a trainer, or exercising on one’s own, people will have a better chance at living longer, healthier, and
Today in America, more and more people are becoming overweight and obese. Obesity is becoming a major problem in the United States. According to Melissa Abramotivs, the author of “Obesity” more than fifty million people in the United States weigh over one fifth of their body’s ideal weight (Abramotivs 2). Studies from “Nutrition and Weight Management” states that nine out of twenty adult women and one out of four adult men are trying to lose weight. The eating habits of American citizens are starting to get out of control. In the United States, adults are gaining excess weight, children are beginning to eat more, and the prices of healthy foods are increasing. So should the government regulate …show more content…
Also, the government should regulate food because the cost of both public and private health insurance and healthcare would drop drastically. By restricting food, fast food restaurants would serve better and healthier choices (Baskt). On the other hand, the government should not regulate food because it raids the people’s right to public and private right of freedom. By restricting food, government would spend way more money by focusing on one problem. The restriction of food would increase the food prices from restaurants to stores all over in order to meet the government’s standards. Ultimately, food restrictions would cause unemployment, business failures, closing of restaurants, and lesser competition (Kiel). The government wants to keep people protected and make life better. Therefore, they should have the right to regulate what one person consumes.
The problem of obesity is not just about food; it is about an entire lifestyle. Many people today are fighting the war against obesity, and they are fighting vigorously to win. But by investing into each one’s life today, eating healthy, hiring a trainer, or exercising on one’s own, people will have a better chance at living longer, healthier, and