Should Same-Sex Marriage Be Better Off?

This issue has mostly been about whether same-sex couples who love one another should have the right to marry as heterosexual couples. Those who are for same-sex marriages argue that same-sex couples should have a right to marry as heterosexual couples. They argue gays as individuals will be better off because marriage has not improved and women may be worse off. For this reason they say same-sex marriage will benefit gay individuals. They also argue gay couples will be better off because marriage entails that heterosexual couples will be able to support themselves better, financially, emotionally, and psychologically. Just as heterosexual couples will be able to support themselves better so will those in same-sex marriages, and thus gay couples will be better off. Another argument those for same-sex marriage argue is children of gay couples will be better off because gay couples can better take care of children than parents who are not married, and gay couples will not have to worry about decisions alone like single parents (Arguments for Gay Marriage). Though these are good arguments, I refute such arguments, and I am against any same-sex couples having the right to marry as heterosexuals because it is …show more content…
Though a heterosexual couple still has a chance of contracting STDs, HIV, AIDS, and other sexual diseases, those who engage in anal sex have a much higher risk of contracting STDs, HIV, AIDS, anal diseases, and any other sexual diseases. Men polled at 61% more, to be in poorer health than heterosexual marriages. Same with women, polled at 46% more to be in poorer health than heterosexual marriages (Sifferlin). Also, same-sex marriage is not natural. God never intended for a man to take his genitals and stick it in another man’s anal, which is just not natural, and it is sickening. On the other hand, if a man has sexual intercourse with a woman, this is natural because it was designed by God to be that