Should Riot Squads Be Censored?

Improved Essays
Free speech has become a big deal in this country. Riot squads are not allowed to say certain things in basketball and football games. In school, students are being kept away from saying things that may disturbing or offensive. Ideas are being censored too because they can be “disturbing” or offensive. Students should not be censored because of their ideas or statements.
Riot squads are not allowed to say things mean to the other team in basketball games. Riot squads are not allowed to say “airball” when the players miss a shot. When a player shoots a free throw, riot squads are not allowed to yell at the player anymore. Riot squads are not allowed to make fun of the players after the game. Riot squads are being censored for everything now.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the case Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, the question of whether a group of students’ rights under the first amendment are violated is asked. These students had written articles for their school newspaper, which they had then submitted for review to their advisor, who passed the articles on to the principal, Robert Reynolds. Reynolds found two articles concerning, and with the approval of his superiors, eradicated the two pages that these articles were on from that publication of the newspaper. The principal’s deletion of these articles did violate the students’ rights under the 1st Amendment.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Should schools be allowed to limit students online speech? I think schools should be allowed because some student may try and take the internet to their advantage. So, what i mean by that is that student will post things on their social media and think nobody can do anything about it. Students will post things on social media about another person behind their back and before they know it they are getting bullied or being laughed at. Students or teachers can be victims of cyberbullying.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The 1st Amendment guarantees freedom of speech. The Court, in Tinker v. Des Moines, 1969, made clear that "students do not abandon their Constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate. " Common speech forms are changing, and school authorities are often a generation or two behind these changes. Schools are also entitled to their own rights for example gun free zones despite the second amendment.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The use of censorship in society over time has become overused and the factors that should be used to determine censorship have become overlooked. Censoring has multiple benefits and is a great concept, however it is often taken to the extremes by the government, teachers, school boards and parents. Censorship should be based on possible issues, content and maturity of the audience. In the novel F451, Ray Bradbury composes a futuristic society where censorship is key and the government as well as society censors the idea of books and the knowledge within them. The factors that should be used to evaluate whether or not censorship should be used are not “Montag, take my word for it, I’ve had to read a few in my time, to know what I was about,…

    • 371 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Hazelwood Sch. Dist. vs. Kuhlmeier, 1988). A school's action to suppress free speech can also depend on the age and maturity of students; the relationship between teaching method and valid educational objective; and the context and manner in which the material is presented. (Ward vs. Hickey, 1993).…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cuckoo's Nest Censorship

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    They can formulate opinions on these issues at a later date, when they are older and more mature. You have to remember, though, that, as stated by the National Council of Teachers of English in “The Students’ Right to Read,” “youth is the age of revolt.” It is at this crucial age that kids begin to question everything they have been taught from the moment they were born. Therefore, when censored, teachers “are placed in the morally and intellectually untenable position of lying to their students about the nature and condition of mankind.” They are misinforming their students about the complexities of the world and leaving them ill-prepared for life beyond high school.…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sojeong Lee Journalism 400 Exam 1 The First Amendment protects freedom of speech with restrictions made by the court to protect the peace of society. These exceptions include any speech that is libel, obscenity or incites imminent violence and illegal activity. The government may intervene and take action against the students if the material of the publication or their conduct is considered unprotected speech.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Colleges always face a lot of scrutiny when it comes to how they are run. In recent years, the First Amendment has come into play on campuses across the nation. Many articles have been written defending both for and against restrictions, defending the use of trigger warnings in class, and explaining what this controversy is really about. While the colleges themselves have the power to choose what they do, they must consider what experience they want to provide for their students. What is Free Speech?…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Schools should be allowed to limit students’ online speech. But schools should limit students’ online freedom of speech because students’ cyberbully students and staff, disrupt students learning, and impacts other people 's lives. Both Freedom of Speech and The First Amendment has the same meaning, which is that there is no law that abridge the freedom is the right to give your opinion about a topic. The freedom to speak or write without the government restraint and First Amendment protects the freedom of speech, religion, and petition and they have the right to seek out writing and thoughts of anyone they choose to hear or write. The U.S. Constitution was signed on September 17, 1787, the constitution did not included all the freedom escentuals…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our first amendment right gives us the right to say what we want, and where we want, which Americans hold near and dear to them. First amendment rights seem to clash when it comes to students. The article argues that student speech should be treated differently depending on whether the speech occurs under school supervision. In the article, it talks about student speech under school supervision and student speech outside of the school.…

    • 571 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under the Constitution the First Amendment states “Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” The right to speak freely archived in the First Amendment is a sacred assurance, as well as an inevitable piece part of the democratic government and independence, which are key qualities in our society. “Censorship,” according to Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, “is an almost irresistible impulse when you know you are right.” That is the reason why an American citizen 's entitlement to free speech should be held as the highest excellence and any restriction of the right to speak freely should not be permitted,…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First Amendment protects citizen’s rights to free speech. The First Amendment is “applied to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, restricts governmental interference with citizens’ free expression rights” (McCarthy, Cambron-McCabe, & Eckes, 2014, p. 93). However, students’ right to free speech in the educational setting can be limited if “the expression is likely to disrupt the educational process or collide with the rights of others” (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 98). The Supreme Court applies the First Amendment in many cases regarding free speech. Through these various cases, the Supreme Court has established four legal principles to guide student expression rights in public educational facilities (McCarthy et al., 2014, p. 95).…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cyberbullying Dbq

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thesis and road map: Should schools be able to limit online speech because it hurts students as well as teachers, it hurts…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some schools, especially those that provide devices to their students, are not only limiting free speech, but invading the students' privacy. Schools will often monitor student devices and activity both in and out of school. Students are often punished for posting on social media criticizing teachers or administrators. This should be allowed, because if it is not stated in school, this form of free speech should not be controlled. As said before, schools are an example of what democracy is.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I think the case is completely out of place because these going to an institution where they teach the value of the expression and your right to ejércela written in the Constitution of the United States of America, but while this institution is removing this right . I understand that as an educational institution authorities should prevent any conflict and supporting student welfare and really approve, but I do not agree to the suspension of a minority of five students to lack of evidence and taken over by assumptions never tested of student authorities. Practically this suspension are telling you that you can not express your beliefs because they can be a risk to the student community, but the cast with which I feel more unhappy about all this is that allowed other students to express political way of bringing the famous pins given away in these campaigns or even recognized as supporting the metal crosses causing many deaths and the First World War Adolf Hitler. I totally agree that there is a story behind this bracelet but were not respecting the cast that they were simply expressing their opinions which is a right written in the constitution about the United States of America participating in the war with Vietnam and student authorities did not know the reasons and do not see why they should have known why these children wore the bracelet, clearly we realize that all five children were part of the same family, then to take the decision to suspend not only were suspending were taking away their right to freedom of expression to a family, because clearly if each of the children had was because there was a belief that came from the house and as I said were not only suspending they were violating the right to freedom of expression to a family .…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays