If someone wants to kill they don’t need firearms to do it. Knife attacks, vehicle attacks, and homemade explosives can do just as much damage as a firearm can, sometimes even worse. You can’t stop someone from killing by taking away one of the weapons most used. You could even use a fork to kill someone it doesn’t take much. Banning firearms will just make people lash out, causing more …show more content…
People fear them not because of what they can do, but what they represent to the person. Firearms have a reputation for being used only to harm others. That’s not the only thing firearms can be used for. Firearms can be used for sporting purposes, or as a tool. By learning how to use and handle a firearm, being around a firearm doesn’t have to be a frightening experience.
The value of a human life can have a different meaning to a different person. Most people would value a human life and not be able to take it, but the people that don’t are the ones who pull that trigger which leads to most of the shootings that happen around the world. Most people argue that without firearms there would be less killings and maybe it would stop it for good. If someone feels that they are destined to kill they will kill, with or without firearms. There are many ways people can kill a large amount of people, taking away firearms doesn’t change the value of human life, or the way people see