Essay On Genetic Engineering Ethics

Superior Essays
Be that as it may, the decisions that parents make during genetic engineering can limit the autonomy of the child whom was “designed” a specific way. Even more, the pressure that can be applied onto a child can be exceedingly overwhelming. Obviously, a child is not able to control whether or not their parents alter their genes, but without genetic engineering there would be more of a potential range of genes a person could be born with. For example, children do not get to decide if they end up growing to be six foot and five-inch-tall with five foot and five-inch-tall parents or a natural inclination for music reading or intelligence. As a result, these children lost their right to choose and had their lives planned out for them before they even were able to make decisions or think for themselves. There is no guarantee that evaluating the autonomy of the …show more content…
When considering ethics, we must evaluate the difference between what we can do and what we should do. There is no clear cut, definite solution when considering whether or not parents should be able to alter the genome of their children and in which ways altering is considered ethical. With the utilitarian concept, there is no right answer, there is only the idea of the “best answer,” which includes the many complex contradictions between each side of the controversy. For example, on one hand, through genetic engineering there is a large percentage of a population of children who are born without any predisposition towards a genetic disease, but on the other hand, there is the other percentage of the population affected by this disease that no research is being conducted on. The majority of the population was not affected, therefore there was little to no awareness about the disease and people did not want to financial support the research for only minimal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this enthralling, enlightening book, Ronald M. Green’s Babes by Design: The Ethics of Genetic Design explores the potential promise and threat in the innovation of genetic engineering. Babies by Design offers several elements of the complicated subject: it presents an eloquent description of the sophisticated technology and science, it clearly recaps the reasonable arguments for and against numerous exercises of biotechnology, and it relates the ideas of science fiction to that of the uncertain future. Green graduated Summa Cum Laude at Brown University, before receiving his Ph.D. in religious ethics from Harvard University in 1973. Green has written nine books and more than 170 articles on theoretical and applied ethics. This gives him…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it's acceptable to modify one gene, why not two, or 20 or 200? At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone's specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? Given what we know about human nature, the development and commercial marketing of human genetic modification would likely spark a techno-eugenic rat-race. Even parents opposed to manipulating their children's genes would feel compelled to participate in this race, lest their offspring be left behind.”…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One controversial topic that provokes debate is genetic modification. In the essay “Proposed Treatment to Fix Genetic Diseases Raises Ethical issues” the author Rob Stein explains the process of genetic engineering and suggests a solution. The government is debating if the should let scientists “make changes in some of the genetic material” in the egg so the baby will not have certain genes. The main goal is to “help women deliver healthy, normal children.” There are some risks with this process such as birth defects.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Sandel in “The case Against Perfection” talks about benefits and drawbacks in genetic engineering, designer children, and bionic athletes. The benefit is that improving technological advancement, we will be able to treat and prevent many diseases that are prevalent today. The downside is that exponential growth of technologies will allow us to manipulate our own nature, to enhance our cognitive abilities, physical strength, and choose genetic traits of our children to make ourselves “better than well” (Sandel, 2004). Sandel argues that Genetic engineering offers us the power to master our nature, but that kind of power & choice threatens our ability to appreciate life as a gift, and erode human agency by allowing us to serve our purposes…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area forever, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally find itself in the news and the argument reignites but falls flat within a couple of weeks waiting till the next breakthrough arises. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent progress in genetic engineering, which brings into perspective the relevance, development, and the possibility that soon…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Physical and Genetic Mutilation One person dies each minute from cancer. Cancer, among other diseases caused by genetic mutation, can potentially be prevented by scientific gene manipulation. Ten percent of the cases of cancer in the United States are caused by genetics, not environmental or physical factors. So if doctors can manipulate the gene pool before birth in an unborn child, would that be an ethical thing to do?…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crispr Code Of Ethics

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For scientists who are waiting for an alternative to existing genome editing tools, Crispr-cas9 is the solution which is comparatively easy and effective in using. Crisper allows the researcher to edit, target, excise and stitch genes of their choice between two end cuts. Crispr has the potential to make such advances which researchers used to dream about. It worked so well, scientists began to issue ethical statements for its use particularly about the power of Crispr to change germline in humans which presents a hotly debatable issue. Genome editing in human germline could have unpredictable effects on future generations.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deciding Actively Listening for the Public Voice, by Robert Cook-Deegan and Jane Maienschein, discusses the issue of genetic engineering and the ethical dilemma and how the United States, government, and people are interacting in the struggle of the ethics behind genetic engineering. The authors present the facts that genetic engineering has laid in the grey area ever since it was first brought to in lab, and still continues to sit in that grey area. Genetic Engineering will occasionally pop up in the news and the argument will be reignited but quickly fizzle out till the next breakthrough appears on media. Cook-Deegan and Maienschein stats some of the most recent breakthroughs in genetic engineering which brings into perspective the relevance,…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Walter Glannon explores several moral problems with genetic enhancement in his article “Genetic Enhancement,” published in Glannon’s book, From Genes and Future people: Philosophical Issues in Human Genetics (and later in Bioethics Principles, Issues, and Cases.) Glannon believes that “gene therapy is permissible if it is intended to ensure or restore normal functions, but it is morally illegitimate if it is aimed at enhancing functions beyond normal.” (577) Glannon, a professor of bioethics and philosophy at the University of Calgary, holds the Canada Research Chair in Biomedical Ethics and Ethical Theory at the University of Calgary in Alberta. He is well known for publishing 4 books and over 27 articles related to bioethics and philosophy.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Today, there are more thoughts about allowing parents to bioengineer their children. Instead of relying on fate to see how their baby turns out, some people want the power to genetically modify their kids before birth. For example, if a parent wanted a tall boy, they could predetermine this. Contrastingly, Michael Sandel argues bioengineering because again, it takes away the giftedness of children. He explains, “To appreciate children as gifts is to accept them as they come, not as objects of our design, or products of our will, or instrument of our ambition,” (45).…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Through all the examples provided, man’s desire to control the genetic development of children pushes genetic engineering in the wrong direction. Although parents facilitate a child’s internal development by preventing disease, the temptation for further genetic modification overrides a parent’s potential to enhance…

    • 610 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “At what point do children become artifacts designed to someone’s specifications rather than members of a family to be nurtured? (Hayes 245).” In “Genetically Modified Humans? No Thanks,” Richard Hayes argues against Ronald M. Green, a professor of Emeritus of Religion and of Ethics and Human Values at Dartmouth College, specifically responding to his essay about using genetic technology to change children’s DNA. Hayes, who holds a Ph.D. in Energy and Resource, which saluted the United States to ban human cloning worldwide, believes it would disrupt human nature and the human future.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethics of gene manipulation proposes a rather complex debate because of opposing religious/individual takes on this issue. My position on this issue is “in-between” because this could be a fantastic advancement at rescuing a family from a harmful genetic disease passing on and advances in genetic engineering have and still could enable an abundance of people with infertility problems to start a family. Although, the negative impacts of gene manipulation remain vital, it violates a child’s autonomy by selecting a future for him/her and it leads to great social inequalities. Gene manipulation could be a fantastic advancement at rescuing a family from a harmful genetic disease passing on to their offspring.…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scientists are experimenting a lot of new methods that improves human health and upgrading technological advances. The findings from their experiments and research are revolutionizing the way how people are born and live . It is getting to the point where couples can modify an embryo to not have some sort of cancer and birth defects for an expensive cost. However, it doesn’t stop there because later on these couples will be able to modify and customize the embryo completely and make the perfect child that they wanted and wished for. This process that the couple can do is called genetic modification.…

    • 1059 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    10. The ethical concerns or fears raised by many people have to do with the introduction of a different gene into another organism. The main problem is that the introduced gene may be unacceptable to an individual’s culture, religion, belief or health. In fact, it has been confirmed that certain allergy causing compounds can be introduced in genetically modified (GM) foods and the nutritional compositions.…

    • 1208 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays