Pros And Cons Of Offshore Oil Drilling Off The Coast Of North Carolina

Improved Essays
Should oil drilling be allowed off the coast of North Carolina? This question has sparked mass controversy not only in North Carolina but around the world. With population growth at an all-time high and demand for natural resources increasing rapidly, the race to energy security for our nation has escalated. In 2015, the Obama administration, declared the consideration of allowing offshore oil drilling off the coasts of Georgia, Virginia, South Carolina, and North Carolina. The U.S Department of the Interior drafted a 5-year plan making oil and gas leasing available on the southeast coast. What is offshore drilling exactly? Offshore oil drilling is an automated process which oil companies use to locate under water oil reserves and extract …show more content…
This would bring a significant increase to the states gross state product with increases to the state economy anticipated to extent well over $ 4 billion by 2035. In addition to that figure, hopes that the state/federal revenue sharing arrangement is authorized for the Atlantic coastal states, North Carolina could gain serious government revenues. “Under 37.5% revenue sharing structure, North Carolina state government revenues from bonuses, rents and royalties are projected to reach $855 million per year by 2035 and the cumulative effects on the state budget from 2017 to 2035 are projected to be nearly $4 billion.” (API, 2013)
Cons of offshore oil drilling off the coast of North Carolina,
• One major concern of offshore drilling is the potential of an oil spill of mass proportions or an oil blow out like the famous disaster from BP in the Gulf. “The significant die-off of whales and dolphins that began in 2010 continues today,” said Biedron. “Increased mortality rates and diminished reproductive success can have long-term effects on marine mammal populations impacted by the spill.” (Cranor,
…show more content…
Methane is the main component of natural gas, but has more negative impact on the environment than carbon dioxide in the terms of warming of the planet. Which has been a huge issues surrounding global warming and climate change debates. “The EPA says the oil and gas sector’s methane emissions account for almost 30% of all U.S. methane emissions” (Harder, 2016)
Offshore oil drilling off the coast North Carolina is a very complicated and sensitive issue that have many aspects involved that need to be considered carefully, not only locally but worldwide. My option of the best energy policy for Americas future is to start rapidly investing in clean renewable energy sources such as solar and wind, but as our reliance on oil is so heavy there is no denial that it will be needed for the next few decades to come. Therefor after much consideration and research I would have to side with pro drilling. Allowing drilling to begin will only further secure our independence from foreign oil that places our nation in economic and political danger. It will substantially increase economic activity in multiple industries, as well as create new much need employment. And improve upon technology alongside research and development. The only way offshore drilling can become most effective and productive is if the commutation and cooperation between scientist, oil companies, communities and the government is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    If the United States decides to drill on Alaska’s soil, then the whole ecosystem could potentially suffer from fracking, possible human error (such as oil spills, transportation mishaps going from site to site), or being driven away from the lands they were born and raised in. For example, the porcupine caribous’ migration-instinct leads their species on a 400 mile odyssey, the longest migration for a land mammal on Earth. The drilling sites and roads being built on this foreign land would throw their species into confusion, causing them to definitely be separated. This would lead them to reduce their mating and significantly reduce their population. According to Lauren Bettino and Hank Moylan in their article Impacts of Oil Drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, a native-Alaskan tribe (the Gwich’in tribe) depends on these caribou as apart of their heritage, culture, and traditions.…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the small city of Bridgeport and generally throughout West Virginia, the overall perception of the Oil and Gas Industry remains positive. The industry continues to bring hundreds of jobs into the immediate area that in turn greatly stimulates the local economy. Not only does the community benefit by the addition of new jobs, but it has also been improved by the increase in need for housing, restaurants, stores, and so forth. Local businesses including construction, real estate, and retail establishments all experience a direct increase in revenue attributable to the Oil and Gas Industry. The resulting increase in local and State tax revenues in turn benefits everyone.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone who has spent a prolonged period of time in the wild and has enjoyed the experience of observing the world in it’s natural habitat can see the importance of preserving our wildlife. In Jimmy Carter’s attempt to save the wildlife refuge in Alaska he uses reasoning, evidence, the past, and personal experience in the wild. Carter argues that preserving this extraordinary pure land in it’s “pure, untrammeled state” would be a “Great triumph for America”. Jimmy Carter starts by exonerating the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge and describing its natural beauty and magnificence. He does this to get the reader to relate and use their own experience in nature to start a sense of credibility towards what he is writing.…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This directly ties into if the benefit of drilling itself is economically worth while for the land. Also, the status of the environment is another important question that must be asked; and which species are directly affected by this drilling process in the Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. This ultimately brings up a cost to the environment that must be found to also determine if the benefit of drilling will outweigh…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking Issues

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Fracking, the informal name for hydraulic fracturing, is a method of extracting natural gas from the earth. In this process, a well is drilled deep into the earth to reach shale. Once it hit this level, the well takes a ninety-degree turn and runs through the layer. Water with other dissolved chemicals is pressurized and sent down the well to create cracks in the shale. This solution helps absorb the gas and is subsequently pumped back up the well to the surface (NYTimes).…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fracking Cons

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Can We Know Fracking and Drilling are Safe? Fracking is injecting liquid, filled with chemicals and water, into the earth to reach oil or gas to then extract it. Fracking is controversial due to the fact that the earth, humans, and water supply is harmed in the process. Research has shown that fracking is not necessarily a safe process, but there are safer ways to complete the process.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While winter approaches, arctic cold fronts bring a decrease in temperatures to the prairies and the demand for heat and energy increases. Western Canada derives much of its main source of heating fuel from natural gas. It also leads Canada in the production of natural gas through unconventional well production. Natural Gas or Methane (NH4) left in its organic state, and let migrate in the atmosphere as is the case in the Arctic with the thawing of the tundra, is 20 times more harmful as a greenhouse gas then Carbon Dioxide (CO2). When it is burned Methane is relatively cleaner and is less harmful to the environment in terms of greenhouse gas emissions than coal and other fossil fuels.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Hydraulic Fracking is a controversial issue because so little is known about it. But Fracking is some people’s way of life so we can’t just take away their jobs because they have families to feed and to take care of. But on the other hand Destroying are environment and endangering the public isn’t right either just because we need natural gas. Everyone has a side and an opinion but before making your decision on what side you’re on you should always read about it and look up facts. Fracking shouldn’t be allowed in North Carolina because the people drilling aren’t responsible enough to take care of the people and the environment due to their lust for money.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The readily argued caribou migration routes are moot points in this discussion, with about 200 miles of coastline not affected by drilling. Naturally, people have seen the negative large scale effects of oil pollution for example the spill in the Gulf of Mexico. However, “Energy companies have figured out how to drill wells with fewer toxic chemicals, enclose wastewater so it can't contaminate streams and groundwater, and sharply curb emissions from everything from truck traffic to leaky gas well valves.” This means drilling would only last two years with small effect to wildlife and no effect to groundwater or fear of chemical…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Coal Oil Point along the California coast releases and estimated 2,000 to 3,000 gallons of oil into the Oceans each day, according to livescience.com. The BP Deepwater Horizon catastrophe in 2010 spilled 205.8 million gallons of oil and 225,000 tons of methane into the Gulf of Mexico, proven by biologicaldiversity.org. An oil spill is the release of a liquid petroleum hydrocarbon into the environment, especially marine areas, due to human activity, and is a form of pollution. Since so much oil is being released into the ocean, should we really risk clean water to oil? Bernie Sanders once said “We all remember the BP oil disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the worst oil spill in U.S. history.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Problems Of Fracking

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Problems of fracking the Gas Introduction Fracking is needed for one of our most profitable resources which is gas. Gas helps us as people travel by putting gas in our car, eat by uses gas stoves, stay warm by uses gas heaters, and so on. Although fracking is benefiting us, there are claims that it is also harming us. The claim is that fracking put contaminants like methane in our water. According to Wikipedia, Methane is the simplest alkane, and is the main component of natural gas.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Problems With Fracking

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Problems that Require these Polices There are many problems that has led to our current policies on fracking, which include the growth of the United States and its dependency on foreign oil has caused transformations in our technological innovations within the oil and gas industries. There are other areas which are more concerning, for instance, the regulations regarding fracking is that they are over thirty years old. Regulations vary from state to state, and the government has simply put failed to take a leadership role in the matter and has left some very unresolved concerns for public safety. These concerns are over the environmental impact caused by fracking. Environmentalist fear that humans and the wildlife are endanger caused by fracking contaminating surrounding water supplies (Davenport, 2015).…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fracking Debate

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I agree that the fracking debate has sparked a lot of controversy, especially in the Pennsylvania region, recently. What is comes down to in my opinion are business versus environmental interests in the broadest sense. There is no question that fracking emits oil and natural gas that is a beneficial source of energy. However, that consequences of that process are what is the problem. Harming the water supply of the locals as well as damaging countless acres of property due to fracking are main concerns.…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico must be stopped. Oil drilling in the Gulf of Mexico is horrible for lots of people and animals. It hurts are loving environment,are animals,and it hurts the wallet of the U.S. This drilling is killing are beautiful coral reefs.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Following are two reasons for my opinion. Reason number one is that consequences of drilling, such as the Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill, have been proven to develop long-lasting negative effects on our world. Of course, it would be ludicrous to drill for oil with the knowledge that we would be killing plants, animals, and food resources for other human beings if an occurrence such as this were to happen. In addition, with the knowledge that we most likely will not get enough oil from this reserve to last us a single year, it again seems foolish to spend our time and money drilling for oil where there is no advantage for doing…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays