Should Officials Be Able To Monitor Social Networking Sites

Improved Essays
Should officials be able to use the information from social networking sites without permission? According to many people, officials should be able to check a person’s belongings in order to keep the community safe. Safety is not as important as privacy. Officials should not be able to use information they obtained from private devices or social networking sites in order to protect the community.

There are many reasons why officials should not be able to monitor students’ online activity. For example, monitoring someone else's online activity and phone snooping is an invasion of privacy and a violation of freedom of speech. Gregory Diaz, a criminal suspect, agrees, saying, “Phone snooping violated the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.” No one should be able to monitor someone’s online activity without their permission. Even if someone doesn’t trust or accuses someone else with something, it still doesn’t make it right. In Addition, an educator's job is to teach, not monitor students. Maria Shepard, a teacher at Princeton Day School in
…show more content…
If a student is bothering another student, the school could address the problem before the dispute gets physical. Also, allowing officers to “open and examine what they find” on an arrested person without a warrant can help solve dangerous crimes. However, looking through a person’s phone or social networking sites can be an invasion of privacy. It can not only invade a person’s privacy, but someone else’s also if that someone has information about someone else on their phone or social network site. “People could have....pictures in there, like of their girlfriends, that they don’t want somebody else to see, and it would be an invasion of privacy not only for them, but the other person also,” California resident Valinten Perez told

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This paper outlines various issues regarding privacy in social media such and the precautions that have to be taken to ensure that information…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sylvia Hurtado Pioneers

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages

    She was born and raised in San Antonio, Texas. She received her bachelor of arts in sociology from Princeton University. She obtained her master’s degree in education at Harvard Graduate School. Afterwards, she went on to UCLA to receive her doctorate degree in education.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, kids must start learning that the “Internet is not a haven of privacy” (Coben 1). So, everything on posted can already be seen are all and maybe even seen by future employers, teachers, or dates. As a result, kids have to be extremely careful about what they post and parents should always be updated and aware of what their child is doing on the Internet. Another argument might be that it is illegal to listen to another person’s conversation, which is true, but only applies to people older than eighteen. Furthermore, it is important to remember that this isn’t the government listens, but that child’s own loving and caring parents, “Loving parents are doing the surveillance here, not faceless bureaucrats” (Coben 1).…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Coben's Controversy

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I agree and disagree with Coben’s claim. Parents should monitor their children for inappropriate things. Parents should not invade their privacy. Parents should also at some point tell their child that they are monitoring them. Like I said before, parents should monitor their children for inappropriate things.…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The issues raised in situation 2 is “You are hired as a programmer for a local school district. The Superintendent asks you to write software that will monitor online access and report online activities to the Superintendent. No permission has been given for this access to be monitored and the Superintendent feels that if people don’t know they are being monitored it won’t hurt them.” Should you write the program and violate the student’s 14th amendment rights with “unreasonable search and seizure” if you will. Even being students, you should have probable cause or permission.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “The Undercover Parent,” Harlen Coben explains why he believes parents of teenagers should monitor their child’s online use using spyware. He states that the internet can be dangerous. I agree to this. However, I feel that when monitoring becomes spying, it has gone too far. Spying on innocent teenagers is inappropriate.…

    • 392 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Undercover Parent Coben

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Don’t Be A Creep Why would you want to spy on your kids? In the article Undercover parent, Coben argues that spying on your kids is a good and bad idea. I think parents should not spy on their kids. One reason parents should not spy on kids is because kids have a right to privacy.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It’s none of their business, why should the parents be able to spy on what teens do. Most teens do go and see what they post daily or who their friends are. You may argue that the Internet creates an unsafe environment, but it can be argued that it is a great learning tool. The Internet is filled with valuable information. It may also be said that the internet is dangerous because of cyber bullying and unknowingly talking to a stranger.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Privacy

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The rapid advancement of technology has allowed surveillance to be performed on an unprecedented scale. Individuals, however, should not be subjected to unwanted spying. According to Harvard Law Review by Samuel D. Warren and Louis D. Brandeis, privacy is “the right to be let alone,” meaning freedom from all forms of surveillance and privacy-invasive behavior. Privacy protects the reputations of individuals. It also protects minorities from unwanted searches and accusations.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Because online activities are treated like any other communications, the rules of privacy should apply. When people engage in online activities they have a legitimate expectation of privacy and this privacy is violated when the government accesses online activities without a warrant. The government should therefore not be allowed to access your online activities without a warrant. Moreover, there are situations where the government does not need a warrant but a court order to access this information. Despite the lesser evidence required for court orders, they nevertheless involve some adjudication on whether it is proper to infringe on the individual’s right to privacy.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is drug testing of students who participate in extracurricular activities permitted under the fourth amendment? fourth amendment states that a person has the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Meaning that the people are protected from unreasonable searches and seizures by the government while it does not guarantee against all searches and seizures, only those the law deems unreasonable. Which is determined by the balance of two important interests being…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The government is not allowed to intercede with your privacy so it would only be fair that schools would not be allowed to do the same. Also, the government can not suppress your freedom of speech just because it is found to be unethical. It is unconstitutional for schools to be able to limit a students Fourth and First Amendment rights without sound reason. Due to this issue the Supreme Court has been ruling in favor of students majority of the time when it comes to cases about students privacy and any cases having to deal with violating a students first amendments as well.…

    • 1887 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantianism is the reasoning to do the right thing, the duty, and having treating everyone equally and not to use someone as a means to an end, and by this theory, the RUX’s action is not ethically justified. The RUX Universities actions on restricting computer usage is in fact justified by this theory. Research by the MIT’s Department of Economics and the US National Bureau of Economic Research show the negative impact on student’s academic performance with computer usage. What the RUX University is trying to accomplish, is to restrict the usage in classroom, which assumes the halt of the negative impact. So they are indeed trying to do the right thing by helping student’s academic performance improve, which is morally doing the right thing, hence it being justified.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Public schools have been equipped with video surveillance CCTV systems even before Columbine. The reasons include increased safety and security for students. Installing video surveillance cameras in schools is a costly project, and school districts must be sure that this is the right route to deter theft, property damage, and to prevent outsiders from entering the school's property. Even though most school districts that have implemented video surveillance systems have faced privacy concerns from parents, students and civil libertarian groups, school officials assert that cameras curb crime and are important sources of physical evidence when crimes do occur. Why should schools use video surveillance?…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some schools, especially those that provide devices to their students, are not only limiting free speech, but invading the students' privacy. Schools will often monitor student devices and activity both in and out of school. Students are often punished for posting on social media criticizing teachers or administrators. This should be allowed, because if it is not stated in school, this form of free speech should not be controlled. As said before, schools are an example of what democracy is.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays