In recent years, gun violence has increased significantly in this world. As Americans, we are facing with an ever-growing problem of violence. There are more cases of children and teenagers engaging in violence. There has been a huge debate over whether gun laws are strict enough and solutions for reducing such acts from occurring. With more people are affected on a regular basis, more problems arise as how people can live safely when guns are being used in increasing numbers. It is disgraceful to say that everyday, the public hear about some sort of gun violence affecting people. There were numerous laws passed in order to control gun firing, where few countries, such as Great Britain, Japan, and Germany banned guns due to the terrorist attacks,
…show more content…
- This is one of the most controversial questions that are currently rumoring today. There are people, who believe that guns should be banned, as guns are the number one killer. The vast majority of gun owners in the United States are law-abiding citizens, who buy guns for sport or for protection (“Gun Control Laws”). The murder of 26 people, including 20 children aged 6 and 7 are dying each day, people argue that if these attacks are happening on a regular basis, then the government should control the gun policy. The Gun Control Act made few restrictions of using gun properly (“Gun Control”). However, the murder rate and homicide rates did not …show more content…
The group says stronger laws on gun control are the answer to protect children. While, few politicians and researchers argue that gun control laws are not effective to stop the terrorist attacks or other firing attacks. According to the recent study, scientists said, “If ammunition background checks and ballistic fingerprinting were also implemented at the federal level, the study finds, the 2010 rate of death in the U.S. from firearms, 10 per 100,000, could drop to less than 1 per 100,000” (Washington Post). Based on the scientist 's interpretation, instead of banning guns, more controlled and strict security near the airports, banks etc.. could reduce the
- This is one of the most controversial questions that are currently rumoring today. There are people, who believe that guns should be banned, as guns are the number one killer. The vast majority of gun owners in the United States are law-abiding citizens, who buy guns for sport or for protection (“Gun Control Laws”). The murder of 26 people, including 20 children aged 6 and 7 are dying each day, people argue that if these attacks are happening on a regular basis, then the government should control the gun policy. The Gun Control Act made few restrictions of using gun properly (“Gun Control”). However, the murder rate and homicide rates did not …show more content…
The group says stronger laws on gun control are the answer to protect children. While, few politicians and researchers argue that gun control laws are not effective to stop the terrorist attacks or other firing attacks. According to the recent study, scientists said, “If ammunition background checks and ballistic fingerprinting were also implemented at the federal level, the study finds, the 2010 rate of death in the U.S. from firearms, 10 per 100,000, could drop to less than 1 per 100,000” (Washington Post). Based on the scientist 's interpretation, instead of banning guns, more controlled and strict security near the airports, banks etc.. could reduce the