The government should not have a say in our diets. Or as another way of saying it, how could he have a say in everyone’s diets? People are free to choose their own diets. There are multiple reasons the government should not or can’t have a say in our diets.
One reason everyone should be able to choose how they want to live or eat is because if people want an unhealthy diet they should be able to choose freely. Some people choose to be unhealthy. And yes, maybe having a controlled diet would help some people in life so they are limited to what they consume but some people need extra vitamins, extra potassium, sugars, or cholesterol. The government can’t control everyone’s needs and medical conditions.
Another reason the government should not have a say in our diets is because he really can’t control …show more content…
There’s millions of people in the world and to control everyone’s diet would take millions of people to watch over everyone. You don’t really think about how much each person consumes a day and to multiply it by millions is completely uncontrollable.
To include this thought, what would the government add or take away from each person’s diet? How would he manage what people buy and consume in their everyday diet? “Recently, Mayor Bloomberg of New York tried to make an infamous ban on 32oz sodas. Although the Supreme Court outlawed it, Mayor Bloomberg may have already achieved what his failed law never could have: he’s already tapped into most people’s inherent desire to be accepted and respected by the community. It’s okay to say it publicly and make people feel it privately: Killing yourself by being 50 or 60 pounds overweight while giving in to the marketing of 400-calorie sodas is being weak and foolish. If politicians followed in Mayor Bloomberg’s tactics on publicizing how bad foods and drinks actually are, it could make people open their eyes. Even though the court may not pass the law, it could potentially give awareness to
One reason everyone should be able to choose how they want to live or eat is because if people want an unhealthy diet they should be able to choose freely. Some people choose to be unhealthy. And yes, maybe having a controlled diet would help some people in life so they are limited to what they consume but some people need extra vitamins, extra potassium, sugars, or cholesterol. The government can’t control everyone’s needs and medical conditions.
Another reason the government should not have a say in our diets is because he really can’t control …show more content…
There’s millions of people in the world and to control everyone’s diet would take millions of people to watch over everyone. You don’t really think about how much each person consumes a day and to multiply it by millions is completely uncontrollable.
To include this thought, what would the government add or take away from each person’s diet? How would he manage what people buy and consume in their everyday diet? “Recently, Mayor Bloomberg of New York tried to make an infamous ban on 32oz sodas. Although the Supreme Court outlawed it, Mayor Bloomberg may have already achieved what his failed law never could have: he’s already tapped into most people’s inherent desire to be accepted and respected by the community. It’s okay to say it publicly and make people feel it privately: Killing yourself by being 50 or 60 pounds overweight while giving in to the marketing of 400-calorie sodas is being weak and foolish. If politicians followed in Mayor Bloomberg’s tactics on publicizing how bad foods and drinks actually are, it could make people open their eyes. Even though the court may not pass the law, it could potentially give awareness to