Should Gay Marriage Be Legal Essay

Improved Essays
Should Gay Marriage Be Legal?
Introduction
According to the ruling by the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodgesin the United States, it is noted that the prohibition of same-sex matrimony is unlawful. Innately, the jury iterated that the Fourteenth Amendment provides equal protection through a due process that should be respected the judiciary, which should protect the rule of law. The United States has long experienced a struggle between people supporting each side of the argument since it is impossible to provide a compromise between them (Lipp). Importantly, the proponents of gay marriages indicate that the world, through its judicial systems, is attempting to limit their rights to wed. Contrastingly, the opponents of the act state that it is against natural law that advocates for heterosexual relationships. Consequently, it is
…show more content…
On one side, it is stated that people have the liberty to exercise their freedom and right as provided by the constitution. For example, the Fourteenth Amendment gives people the sovereignty to be involved in due processes and equality. On one hand, some believe that the same-sex marriages are supported. As such, it is stated that marriage between homosexuals may reduce divorce rates, and this will protect children in these institutions. Additionally, it is reality in the 21st century and it defines the separation of the state from the church. On the other hand, opponents states that it is unnatural and ruins the perspective of marriage as an institution to bare and raise children. Further, same-sex marriage denies children an opportunity to have two parents of different gender to learn in an all-inclusive environment. In perspective, confirmation of same-sex unions is not a suitable undertaking as it could increase number of homosexuals, may disrupt nature of families and might deny children an opportunity to have parents of both

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Gay Marriage and Equality Gay marriage, these two words can make people go from being completely civilized, to arguing like crazy. This is a very sensitive topic for many people, and I honestly don't know why it has to be. I am fully supportive of the gay marriage law and rights. I think that through the years we have had this image of what a perfect society is supposed to be like. Trying to make the perfect society has ruined us we no longer accept people for they are, we only accept people that fit our own idea of perfect.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sexual orientation and inequality Name Institution affiliation Sexual orientation and inequality Until recently same-sex marriage was illegal in the United States. People were arrested for being illegal for violating sodomy laws. The laws were finally outlawed in the year 2003 by the Texas court after a 6-3 was passed.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ruling in the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court case was decided on June 2015. With a 5-4 decision, the right to marriage, originally saved for “traditional” couples meaning man and women, was extended to same-sex couples. This would overrule any states previous laws against same-sex marriage. This marriage would become legal throughout the entire country. Although, the Supreme Court made this ruling, many against gay rights argue that it is unconstitutional.…

    • 1472 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Recently, gay marriage has been legalized in the United States, but that doesn’t necessarily mean the fight is over. The gay rights movement has had several victories in the past, but the continuous discrimination…

    • 1649 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage is an important issue that have been a central point in modern society. Certainly, the importance of this issues should be decided on the foundation of civil freedom and civil rights. The recognition of the legitimate rights of same-sex married couples should be acknowledged and protected under the law. Thus, rejecting same-sex couples, the legal rights to get married is the despicable indecency denying human rights to lively freely. “Gay marriage is really a matter of respect and human rights Across the world, gays are subjected to violence simply because they are gay, and the United Nations Human Rights Council has recently condemned this violence.…

    • 1431 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage” talks about the revolution and changed of society's preference on sexuality. The keys to the kingdom of the married might have been held by the only by private citizens—religious bodies and their leaders, families, others parts of civil society. So it has been in many societies throughout history. In the United States, however, as in most modern nations, government holds those keys.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sexual orientation is not currently a protected characteristic under the federal civil rights law like race, gender, ethnicity, or religion is. Discrimination against LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender) based on gender identity or sexual orientation is an issue that affects individuals worldwide and in our community also. There are still many obstacles to receive equality that LGBT Americans are facing. Many states (including Texas) have no laws protecting employment non-discrimination that covers sexual orientation and gender identity. This means that an LGBT individual can be fired for merely just being who they are.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Today we live in a society where same-sex marriage is a serious thing and cannot be, but why can't it be? There are a wide variety of opinions about this topic, several points of view, some against others in favor. Aristotle said: "The only stable state is the one in which all citizens are equal before the law," that Aristotle's phrase has a lot to do with what they do with marriages between people of the same sex. Currently, gender differentiation is not an indispensable requirement for emotional and sexual human relationships. The debate on the legality and scope of same-sex marriage is one of the most agitated and dynamic in the world.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many things that define catholic citizenship. The first thing to talk about is the right to life. Every single person and animal has the right to live and enjoy God’s creation. Every living thing has the right to breathe, eat, and drink of God’s creation. Therefore, abortion is wrong.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays