Exotic Animals Should Be Banned Essay

Improved Essays
Did you know that there have been very few deaths caused by exotic animals and not many injuries caused either? According to National Geographic, there have been around 540 or more total human injuries caused by exotic animals and around 75 total human deaths caused by exotic animals from 1990 to 2012. Many were caused by stupidity and at times it was due to the person teasing the animal, but some were due to the instinct of the animal and that is something they simply can't stop. Even though there is a risk, people should be able to own exotics. For example, people should be able to own exotic animals if animal welfare is taken care if and if people use them for commercial purposes such as keeping the animals in facilities and trading them to make sure that they don’t go extinct. Also, the dangers are low and it wouldn’t be fair to ban exotics over something that they just can’t help or because of a person being idiotic.
People should be
…show more content…
The dangers are low, people could use them for commercial purposes, they could be owned if animal welfare is taken care of, and they should be banned because of a few idiotic people. If exotic animals are banned, then humans and children should be banned as would be the only way to absolutely stop murder and many other incidents. This is very idiotic for humans to be banned due to a few incidents and murder, but it also very foolish for people to be banned from owning exotic animals due to incidents and deaths. So why do people find it ok that exotics should be banned? Although the price could be a bit pricey or high in worth, depending on who you are, it is your choice on whether or not you waste the money and you should obviously do a background check or research to see if it would be the smartest thing or not. Some people like to live life to the fullest and do risky things that can result in injuries and we as people shouldn’t ruin their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    So, the statement that is claimed before could not possibly be true if more animals are being killed than saved. To finish, animal testing is cruel and unreasonable. There are many other ways to stop the cruelty from spreading, yet not many people are willing to take the chance to stop it. Not much protection is put towards these animals. Stopping America from making animals distressful, locked up, and treated unfairly could make the country a much better place for humans and…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Is Wrong

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The cellular, metabolic, and anatomic systems of animals are really different from humans so the fact that they would be considered as good test subjects is really bad (ProCon). It is very unacceptable to experiment on animals because, “animals suffer like humans do, so it is speciesism to experiment on them while we refrain from experimenting on humans” (ProCon). Meaning that human superiority leads to the exploitation of animals. Animal testing does not always work, because it is known that some medical breakthroughs with animal research can and could have been made without the use of animals (ProCon). Knowing that animals can have serious harm done to themselves during animal testing is horrible and changes the entire…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also bear in mind that sometimes not taking a risk can be just as risky. If you are feeling uncertain, make a list of all the best possible outcomes of taking a risk as well as what the worst case scenarios are and then compare the two. This will allow you to gain a better perspective of things as fear can often distort our thinking. Instead of fearing risks, let them motivate you. There will always be excused for not doing something, so don’t use these as a justification for not trying.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Also, Singer suggests that experimenting with other species for human interests is another major form of speciesism. Animals are chosen for experiments because they are irrational, but there are irrational humans as well. However, they are not taken for experiments because we see it as traditionally immoral. Just being a human gives you a privilege and that creates discrimination of other…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The drug was quickly taken off the market. Something else that you should keep in mind is that medical testing on animals “could mislead researchers into ignoring potential cures and treatments” ("Animal Testing - ProCon.org"). As said before, animals and humans have very different internal systems which means that some chemicals that would be harmful to animals could be perfectly fine to give to humans. An example of this is the drug aspirin. Aspirin is harmful to some animal species but alright to give to humans.…

    • 1556 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Simulating Murder Summary

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On this note the experimenters responded that people who do perform such actions of harm lack empathy towards the victim. Killers lack the moral compass that supposedly is integrated on everyone. Perhaps is their egotistical nature or their unwavering confused thoughts justified their actions as morally right. Is it ok to murder someone, even if that person potentially planning on creating an atrocious act. We can bring self-defense into play to justified killing someone but not for the better good of saving other people’s lives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And the main reason of this to happen is that they are being sold on the black market, with the purpose of receiving more money in exchange of exotic pets. Although some animals are sold legally, some are not and selling is not the only way of acting illegally. Although some people like to have something interesting and exotic in their lives, it should not be an exotic animal because exotic animals are not pets. They are being affected by many factors, and they can affect us similarly. Instead…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are many alternative methods for testing these products that would not harm animals. It is also said that the test results are irrelevant because animals are not the same as humans, thus not getting accurate results. The tests may mislead researchers into thinking certain drugs are safe to be used on humans, or could miss potential cures and treatments. Animal testing is more expensive than testing on alternative things, so to many, they could think of it as being a waste of government money that could be going to things needed much more. Much of the testing done on animals has flaws in the experiment so it ends up wasting the life of the animal.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals do have rights to a certain extent. Animals have the right not be mistreated and used by humans. Indirect duty means that we don’t have direct duties to animals, but we do have duties about animals. So torturing an animal is wrong because it harms the animal not because it upsets other humans. Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals.…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays