How Do Drug Offenders Reduce Crime Rates

Improved Essays
Does Imprisoning Drug Offenders Reduce Crime Rates In today’s society drug offenders are not a sparse. They are in our neighborhoods, our schools, our favorite restaurant, and quite frankly all over our community. Drug offense though might not be the only crimes that they are committing, often times these types of offenders are committing a variety of other crimes as an affect of the substance abuse. In theory, incarcerating drug offenders seems like a rational solution to diminishing crime, although it is only a temporary solution. While statistics might show some correlation between the incarceration of drug offenders and the lower crime rates, it is pertinent to remember that correlation does not mean causation. Drug offenders do deserve to be punished and incarcerated in connection with their offense, but to assume that the incarceration of drug offenders ultimately lowers crime rates is a far reach and wishful thinking at best. …show more content…
Numbers show that in fact, crime rates are lower when a high percentage of drug offenders are incarcerated. It is estimated that “the increase of drug incarceration between 1980 and 2000 is associated with a small reduction in violence and property crime of perhaps 1-3% (Kuziemkoa & Levittb, 2013). The argument in favor of the relationship is quite simple in that it is quite obvious that property and violent crime rates would go down in relation to an increased number of drug offenders sent to prison. This is simply because drug offenders are more often than not the ones committing those types of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    are unsupported by the evidence” (137). While no statistics exist to prove that drug courts impact the amount of initial arrests, statistics do prove drug courts decrease the number of rearrests. In Jessica Huseman’s article “Drug Courts Are a Good Alternative for Drug Offenders” she reviews several scenarios in which individual or specific areas of drug courts have lowered to percentage of rearrests. In New York City, six drug courts decreased the number drug rearrests by twenty-nine percent for three years after the initial arrest. In Oregon, a single drug court reduced the amount of drug rearrests for thirteen years after the initial arrest by twenty-four perent.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Instead of a massive “War on Drugs” we should invest more on community-based prevention and treatment programs. As mentioned in this book it is believed that the rising in imprisonment in the 1990’s may have been responsible for the decline of violent crime, but in fact there may have been other reasons. The healthy economy in the 1990’s created more job opportunities especially for those in low-wage labor market. This could have affected the…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This drastically increased the incentive to sell drugs and led to a spike in violence. Most people would suspect that increases in incarceration rates would be due to many different factors like violence or theft, but Alexander points out that, “ Drug offenses alone account for two-thirds the rise in federal inmate population and more than half the rise in state prisoners between 1985 and 2000”…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mandatory Minimums

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to the National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence “at the most intense levels of drug use, drugs and crime are directly and highly correlated and serious drug use can amplify and perpetuate preexisting criminal activity”. Taking this into consideration, it is not hard to understand why so many people are in support of more severe sentences in response to drug related crimes. While the effectiveness of the use of mandatory minimums to reduce drug related crimes is questionable, supporters of mandatory minimums make some compelling arguments that apply to all mandatory minimums not just those set on drug…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For example, Lindsay Lohan was in a car chase after the mother of her former personal assistant and was found to have cocaine with her. Overall, incarceration is a safer and more effective place for drug abusers because they can get the treatment they need during and after serving jail time and it will get them away from drugs until they are…

    • 1265 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    McCoy (2010) demonstrates that drug courts was established to prevent drug-related crime, help individuals get off using drugs, and help addicts become normal United States citizens. Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) argues “[…] their potential to reduce incarceration lies in their impact on recidivism, leading to fewer future cases on which long periods of incarceration might otherwise have been imposed” (Rempel, Green and Kralstein, 2012, p.190). Rempel, Green and Kralstein (2012) demonstrated that the drug court intervention should not be considered for an alternative to incarceration, right away because this based on their findings, more research needs to be conducted to further provide evidence. Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) argues “[…] that although slight increases in substance use prevalence may not precipitate immediate changes in criminal behavior it may induce later increases in crime” (Sullivan and Hamilton, 2007, p.514). Sullivan and Hamilton (2007) demonstrates that there tends to be a gradual decline in criminal behavior leading to a decrease in substance…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Court Essay

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to NADCP (2015), “Drug courts keeping drug addicted offenders out of jail and in treatment has proven to reduce drug abuse and crime while saving money.” They significantly reduce drug use and crime and are more cost effective than other criminal justice…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In 2005 four out of five drug arrests were for possession of minor drugs, and one out of five were for actual sales… [with] most people in state prison for drug offenses having no history of violence or significant selling activity” (Alexander, p. 60). If the prison system was designed to keep out the most dangerous and worst kind of people behind bars, it shouldn’t be a fact that the majority of those in jail are nonviolent offenders of…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where a murderer can get around 20 years for his or her crime, drug trafficking can reach an outcome of 25 years in prison. Some people, like in one Mississippi man’s case, a felony drug offense gave him 100 years of imprisonment. Others may think that this is fair and justified, as people distributing drugs should be held highly accountable for their actions since they put other people’s lives in danger. However, it can be said that choosing to incarcerate these people does not really teach them a lesson, nor does it drive them away from the life that they live and may continue to live after being locked…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Recidivism

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drug Court Effectiveness and Recidivism of Participants According to the results from the 2013 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II (ADAM II) survey (2014), between two-thirds and three-quarters of all adults males arrested were at risk for drug dependence; as few as one-quarter had sought any type of treatment for drug or alcohol use. (p. xiv). Traditionally, the criminal justice system focused on enforcement and incarceration to reduce drug-related crime, but recidivism has remained high.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These numbers mean that drug offenders account for 25% of the total inmate population (Criminal Justice Degree Hub). Similar to the numbers above, in the 1980s, arrests for drug offenses were around the 500,000 mark. Now, the number of arrests for drug offenses is over 1.5 million. You might be surprised to learn that during this time, the crime rate was actually falling, but prisoners increased due to drug related…

    • 2514 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Essay On Regulatory Law

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The problem is that if criminals are incarcerated, specifically those who commit the crime relating to drugs, they are less likely to feel an effect because the drug business is still continuing. The difficulty that arises in society is the influence, particularly on children. If drugs are being sold around schools, children are more likely to commence…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States leads the world in highest number of people incarcerated. Because of this, the United States also has a prison overcrowding problem that needs attention. Prison overcrowding is becoming a significant problem because of increased recidivism rates, changes to laws, and improvements to law enforcement strategies. All lead to more people put in prison as Portland State University concludes. Although changes to laws and improved law enforcement strategies have good intentions, the fact that more people end up in prison causes far more difficulties.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The type of offender that would be affected by my change in criminal justice policy would be nonviolent drug offenders. It's important to note that the nonviolent drug offenders would only be drug users, not dealers. The proposed policy decriminalizes drug use and instead would impose fines and a probationary period for violators. By decriminalizing drug use, real change may occur. Instead of throwing addicts in jail, there will be a greater emphasis on rehabilitation.…

    • 568 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    crime rate has dropped. Since the 1990s, homicide, burglary and theft have all dropped; violent crime has dropped 40%, and motor vehicle theft by 60% (Farrell, Tseloni, Mailley, & Tilly 2011). Now, the growth in incarceration can be attributed to “increases in decisions to incarcerate and increases in time served, rather than increases in offenses or arrests.” (Schoenfeld 2012, p. 323) This shows that mass incarceration has not contributed to reducing crime; in fact it may have more negative effects than positive ones.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics