Should Death Penalty Be Legal Essay

Improved Essays
In today 's society should the death penalty still be acceptable? In my honest opinion, I do not think the death penalty should still be legal. Morally and in my faith, I do not see how twelve people on a single jury and the final confirmation of the judge should seal the fate of a person. I see value in all life, so if the person on trial did something so vile, so violent, they should just sit in their cell to think about what they have done. Death is too easy; if the prosecution team in the courtroom does their job right, that person will never get out. Death row should not be legal even for the worst of us.
There has been a current arrest of “El Chapo,” the leader of the world 's largest drug ring. They have transferred “El Chapo” from
…show more content…
The cost to keep an inmate facing the death penalty is higher than someone who is serving a life sentence. For example, “Cases without the death penalty cost $740,000, while cases where the death penalty is sought cost $1.26 million. Maintaining each death row prisoner costs taxpayers $90,000 more per year than a prisoner in the general population. There are 714 inmates on California 's death row.”(Death Penalty Information Center) From a taxpayer 's point of view I rather pay for some inmate meal than the injection that kills them. But also on the flip side, I would not want to pay for them at …show more content…
For example, “At least 4.1% of all defendants sentenced to death in the US in the modern era are innocent, according to the first major study to attempt to calculate how often states get it wrong in their wielding of the ultimate punishment”(Ed Pilkington, The Guardian) So one out of twenty-five people if convicted and punished to death is innocent. One person could have the chance to prove they are blameless, but moreover, are being injected and killed for a crime they didn 't commit. If you refer to the bottom photo, this is a picture of a man strapped in at Sing Sing prison in the late 20th century. As the reader, I am drawn to his eyes, they are so defeated. Electric chairs have been used for many years, thousands of times for death row prisoners.
So in conclusion, I believe that the death penalty is wrong morally. No one should be strapped down and should face death by themselves, maybe see their loved ones a few hours prior if they have not committed the biggest crime of all. Taxpayers are essentially paying for someone 's death, we are funding the injection that is placed in their veins. If someone committed this awful crime they should live out their days miserable, stuck in a cell rioting, death is too

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    To keep one prisoner on the death row costs $90,000 for the United States taxpayers. Cases without capital punishment involved cost up to $740,000, while $1.26 million is spent in cases where the death penalty is present. It not only for a moral cause, but also for the costs it takes to go through the death penalty process. It is understandable that governments find this sort of punishments a way to maintain the safety of their population, it has not been as effective as it should…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the process will then repeat. Medical personnel will assess the inmate each round but must first wait five minutes due to the scorching body temperature. The death penalty has been one of the most controversial topics in the entire criminal justice system. From the costs, religion, victim impact, inmate and staff psychological effects, botched executions, deterrence, all the way to those who have no opinion at all, the arguments have fallen into several different categories.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A man named Cameron Todd Willingham who resided in Texas, was convicted of murder in 1992, it was believed that he had set his home on fire with his three children still alive. With this evidence he was put to death in 2002. Later after further evidence was discovered it was sadly too late for Willingham, it was found that none of the evidence used against him was in fact valid. They said they simply misinterpreted the evidence, that the fire was just an accident. They sentenced an innocent, grieving man to death.…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally my opinion on the death penalty is that the law should be banned. The real question is whether we are doing right or wrong are we finding justice in executive people for the crimes they have committed or may not have committed. A famous quote I go by is "An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind" that doing the same thing or seeking revenge on these people that commit crimes makes us no better than the crime…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Death Penalty The Death penalty is a highly controversial topic in present day politics. The public is concerned with how America’s most dangerous criminals are held responsible for their crimes as well as how they will be kept from harming others. It’s reasonable to want a mass murderer to be punished in a manner that removes further threat, but is it our place to decide if his or her life should be ended? In other words, is it moral for society to prescribe murder as retribution for murder?…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Death Penalty: Cruel and Unusual Punishment The death penalty is a cruel process of a bygone era and has no place in modern day civilized society. The death penalty has evolved from a punishment for crimes such as petty theft and adultery to the absolute punishment for crimes such as the rape of a child, kidnapping, treason, and murder, to name a few however the death penalty is fraught with errors.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Their punishment should not be dead even though they killed others. By killing them it is doing what they did even more. They want the murder rate to go down to make the country they live in look good, but they are killing others for crimes. This makes people not want to come to the country because they are afraid of being killed for crimes. Because of this, they don't come to the…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital Punishment, A Capital NO Capital punishment has a long and gruesome history, regrettably that history is not all in the past. Capital punishment, the practice of putting someone to death as punishment for a crime, is still exercised within fifty-eight countries and thirty-one American states. Although today’s methods of government sanctioned executions are more humane and less violent than our days past; when to be put to death meant to be hanged, flayed, burned alive or worse, it should still be considered by all, as a grave injustice to humanity. If killing is so wrong that it is considered one of the worst crimes a person could commit, why should the government be able to do exactly that.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Research Essay The death penalty will always be a topic that will have controversy surrounding it. Whether you side with morality or you side with constitutionality, people will have opposing views to whether or not the death penalty is justified. Many states find themselves struggling to decide if they are pro death penalty or against, to this day 32 states inforce the death penalty while the remaining 18 find the punishment either immoral or unaffordable.…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment is a subject that can be and has been debated for lengthy amounts of time. There are still many countries that perform executions today, but many of these countries differ from the United States greatly. While the death penalty has been used as early as eighteenth century B.C., there is no doubt that there are many factors that make the death penalty a questionable subject in the modern United States. The death penalty should not be utilized in the United States because it is costly, inhumane, and inaccurate.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” which is how the death penalty basically works, the only actual purpose of the death penalty is vengeance which should never be the reason for any punishment especially being one created by the united states government . The death penalty is something that has been here in the US since the 1600s but has changed and progressed into a less cruel form, it is stated that the first form of death penalty was in the form of hanging and has to progressed to the now used injections which will first put the victim to sleep and then stop his heart from functioning, giving the accused with a peaceful death. The death penalty should be made made illegal in the US because their are many other punishments available…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The death penalty costs 2.16 million dollars per execution than the imprisonment of convicted murders for a lifetime (Jacqueline Brux). ii. Philip J Cook a Duke professor states that if the death penalty was repealed it would save the state 21 million dollars of cases in just the trial phase. II. Time a. Colorado i. In Colorado a study of the death penalty efficiency and functionality showed that it took six times the amount of days to pass one death penalty case than it did to pass one life-without-parole case.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A study of Los Angeles County trials has shown that the average trial in which prosecutors demand the death penalty costs $1,898,323, while a murder trial where the death penalty is not sought comes in at $627,322. Death penalty is the most expensive because the constitution requires a long and complex judicial process for any capital cases. The process is required to make sure that innocent men and women are not executed for crimes they did not commit, and also to protect the innocent person from getting executed. According to George Sjostrom, “The cost of the death penalty is too high, both in dollars and in emotional pain,” (192). If we replace the death penalty with a sentence of life without the possibility of parole, it will cost millions less and also ensures that the public is safe and protected and we will also eliminate the risk of…

    • 1307 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adrianna Coffee Dr. Huck GSTR 110 Capital Punishment The death penalty should never be applied as a punishment to a person convicted of intentionally killing another person because the death penalty is a costly, unfair punishment that does not benefit society as a whole. What is the death penalty? The death penalty is defined as “the punishment of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime.” (Definition of Death Penalty in English) Since 1976 there have been over fourteen hundred executions in the United States.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argumentative Essay Against Capital Punishment Google defines Capital Punishment as “the legal authorized killing of someone as punishment for a crime.” It is argued that the death penalty is justice for those who commit crimes deserving of such extreme punishment. It is argued that the death penalty is a punishment set up so that the grieving families of the victims will feel a sense of accomplished justice. According to the Death penalty information center since 1976 there has been 1,438 executions. The death penalty should be abolished because it is a barbaric, immoral, and small-minded.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics