College Athletes Should Be Paid For Playing Time and Autographed Memorabilia In American colleges and universities, student athletes spend many hours in strengthening and conditioning, practicing, and competing in their sports of choice. In return, some of them have the benefit of attending college by way of athletic scholarships. However, some do not have scholarship opportunities and have to meet college expenses in other ways. In my opinion, college athletes should definitely be paid for playing time and autographed sports memorabilia as a way to help finance their college experience.
College athletes should be paid a stipend for their playing time. The amount of time spent by student athletes per week often adds up to that of a part-time …show more content…
Many of these athletes will not play professionally, so autographs and memorabilia are treasures of the time they spend in college sports. For those athletes who only play college sports, their memorabilia often become sought after collectibles.
Paying players for autographs could motivate athletes and help them excel and compete better in their positions on the field. The college football video games had to go for its illegal use of college players without commission, when if handled correctly, paying college athletes for autographs could be a win-win situation for players and for fans. These signatures could make a lifetime of memories regarding special players and their collectibles for family, friends and fans everywhere and for future generations.
Players should be paid at least some of the profit from their memorabilia. Some players’ former equipment is kept on display. However, universities often sale jerseys and equipment players wore during games. Most recently, a helmet of an Auburn University football player Chris Davis, Jr. sold for over $47,000, and Davis received nothing. In 2015, LSU running back Leonard Fournette got permission from the NCAA to auction off his game jersey to help flood victims in South Carolina. Student athletes, like Fournette, should have a choice where their memorabilia goes with permission of their college’s athletic
College athletes should be paid a stipend for their playing time. The amount of time spent by student athletes per week often adds up to that of a part-time …show more content…
Many of these athletes will not play professionally, so autographs and memorabilia are treasures of the time they spend in college sports. For those athletes who only play college sports, their memorabilia often become sought after collectibles.
Paying players for autographs could motivate athletes and help them excel and compete better in their positions on the field. The college football video games had to go for its illegal use of college players without commission, when if handled correctly, paying college athletes for autographs could be a win-win situation for players and for fans. These signatures could make a lifetime of memories regarding special players and their collectibles for family, friends and fans everywhere and for future generations.
Players should be paid at least some of the profit from their memorabilia. Some players’ former equipment is kept on display. However, universities often sale jerseys and equipment players wore during games. Most recently, a helmet of an Auburn University football player Chris Davis, Jr. sold for over $47,000, and Davis received nothing. In 2015, LSU running back Leonard Fournette got permission from the NCAA to auction off his game jersey to help flood victims in South Carolina. Student athletes, like Fournette, should have a choice where their memorabilia goes with permission of their college’s athletic