Pros And Cons Of College Athletes

Superior Essays
Should college athletes be getting paid for what they do? That itself is a million dollar question. For the purpose of this paper, I am going to focus on division one basketball players. It’s really an opinionated topic. A lot of people think that they should be paid and a lot of people believe that they should not be paid. The NCAA has plenty of money to pay division one basketball players and these players have plenty of reasons why they should be getting paid. They train harder than any average person will understand. They put in sweat and sacrifice for the colleges they represent. The NCAA may even benefit if they would pay these top notch athletes.
The NCAA is a non-profit organization that is a worth billions of dollars. This makes them one of the most successful organization, especially
…show more content…
Not all of their money comes from basketball though. Basketball does play a major role though. Last year alone, basketball brought in approximately nine hundred and thirteen million dollars for the NCAA. Eighty-four percent of that came in less than a month. The NCAA Basketball Tournament or better known as March Madness made around seven hundred and seven million dollars last year, making it one of the most profitable time for the NCAA. A thirty second ad during the Final Four cost seven hundred thousand dollars to air.
Many people might think it would be nice to be an NCAA basketball player. They are famous, get tons of recognition, and are probably one of the most popular people on campus. Most people don’t know what a division 1 athlete’s day is like though. Tomeka Davis, a former college basketball player says “The mornings began at 5am with a 2 mile jog.” Most college students have no clue what 5am looks like outside. He then goes on to describe how he goes to morning classes, has lunch, and then back to afternoon classes. He can’t eat the school lunch though, because it wasn’t healthy for him. He would

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Imagine if you were a college athlete striving to provide entertainment for your student body and college fans, along with bringing in revenue for your school. Would you want to be paid for all the hard work, time, and dedication you put in, or are scholarships and grants enough to satisfy you? Whether or not college athletes should be paid is a huge controversy in today’s society and includes many pros and cons. One pro being that college athletics provide revenue for companies, but if we were to play devil’s advocate one could say that the student athletes already receive benefits through the school such as scholarship money, grants, and part time jobs. Through research I have discovered that the cons out weigh the pros, therefore, it would…

    • 1767 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the past few decades, college athletics has grown extremely popular among Americans. With this increase in popularity, the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) has experienced a surplus of revenues because of the billions of dollars they generate through TV contracts, ticket sales, and merchandise sales (Majerol 14). This surplus of sales has fuelled the debate of whether or not college athletes should be compensated for their time spent playing. One may assume that because college athletes are a large contributing factor to the increased revenue the NCAA is bringing in, that they should receive a portion of the profit. However, paying college athletes would only distract the athletes from getting an education, which is vitally…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    College athletics have gained extensive popularity among Americans over the past few decades. This has resulted in an increase in cash flow for the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). The enormous amount of money being made off of college sports has led to the question whether students should be getting paid for their performance. The NCAA, as a whole, makes $6 billion annually. But the players themselves don’t get a dime of the money.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should college athletes be paid for playing? No, they should not because they are already getting scholarships, the colleges might not be able to afford to pay them, and because playing the sport is not a job. Athletes are already getting scholarships, do they really need or deserve to get paid as well? They only play for one season a year, but the scholarships help them all year round, so why do they deserve even more money during the season. Besides, they are not only getting to play a sport they probably really enjoy, but they also get to travel free around the country, be on TV regularly, and maybe even get looked at by professional sports teams.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The controversial topic of paying student athletes has been brought up many times by both the schools and students. The corporate sponsors, broadcasters, and even the NCAA are the ones that get all of the benefits of these kids playing their hearts out. During the NCCA basketball tournament the major broadcasting stations make more than one billion of these games. They can charge…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dresden Lonergan Mrs. Whitehair English 10 Period 2 Research Paper March 2015 Pay for Play Whether or not college student athletes should get paid has been a hot topic recently, and it doesn 't look like it 's ending any time soon. This topic has been debated on ESPN, The Harlem Times, in educational institutions, and many college newspapers. Due to the numerous reasons for it and just as many against, it seems to be an ongoing cycle. These college athletes are basically working full-time jobs and gambling their physical health each day. They are being trained to go professional and be paid, but what if that doesn 't happen?…

    • 1473 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NCAA rakes in on average $12 billion in revenues annually that flow in through college athletics programs(Finley, 2015). The latest and biggest debate is "Whether or not college athletes should get paid?". When college athletes go to college they are not allowed to earn any money while they are participating in athletics, but is that fair? Generally they are putting in full time work hours(40/week) or sometimes even more. As more and more college athletes are struggling to get by through and in some cases after college, it 's time for them to start earning some form of compensation in return for the hard work they put in for their schools.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Student athletes always seem to get deals for the NCAA. The NCAA make deals with brands such as Nike, Under Armour, Adidas and so on. NCAA also get big deals from TV companies. They get this big deals because the companies know they can make money off of these collegiate athletes. "Big time college football and basketball programs generate billions of dollars a year in TV and marketing contracts, ticket sales, and merchandising.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since 2006, the NCAA has made an estimated $814,772,400 and the player get none of that. If they are making that much money a year then the athletes should be able to get some of that because they can’t have jobs since they are so busy with practices and then they have their school work. On the other hand, most of that money is going back to their schools so they can pay their coaches and so they can upgrade their facilities. The NCAA wouldn’t make most of that money if it wasn’t for TV and marketing rights. 81% of that money is from advertising and they other 19% comes from tickets, merchandise, investments and donations.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NCAA is a billion dollar organization. Out of all the money generated from tickets, jerseys, fan apparel, and lucrative contracts,deals the NCAA doesn't spread any of the wealth to any of the college athletes. “Then there’s March Madness on CBS and its neat $1-million-per-commercial rates for the Final Four”(204). And yet the college athletes receive no pay. Most athletes are awarded a scholarship for their…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The NCAA makes a total of $6 billion every year according to the US News website. Broadcasters like CBS make over a billion dollars off of important tournaments and games, “thanks in part to a $700,000 ad rate for a 30-second spot during the Final Four,” as Forbes’s Chris Smith writes (qtd. in Debate Club). Also, the athletic conferences the successful teams are apart of receive millions from the NCAA (Debate Club). One could say the success of many businesses is accredited to college athletes, because without them, none of it would be…

    • 2157 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Being a broke college student isn’t fun. Being a broke college athlete is worse. Broke college students aren’t just needing the money but they need the balance of time, work, and study also. No college student, let alone student athletes would ever turn down the thought of being paid for their services. So why isn’t the NCAA trying to help our college athletes out?…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    For years, people have been arguing that college athletes should be paid. The argument is that college athletes shouldn’t be paid because they are not professionals. When the NCAA was founded in 1905, the institution was committed to not give salaries to student athletes. Over a century, the NCAA is not like it used to be. Today, NCAA athletics draw in around $11 billion every year for the organization, and with all the money, nothing goes to the athletes.…

    • 2160 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reflecting to the documentary “Schooled: The Price of College Sports”. The argument is should NCAA Division I athletes, who are a huge source of revenue to the universities, and broadcaster be paid to play. The NCAA responded to the argument by stating that “Amateur competition is a bedrock principle of college athletics and the NCAA. Maintaining amateurism is crucial to preserving an academic environment in which acquiring a quality education is the first priority. In the collegiate model of sports, the young men and women competing on the field or court are students first, athletes second.”…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever been to a huge NCAA tournament? (Rhetorical Question) The stands are packed, the crowd is roaring, it’s the Final Four in the NCAA tournament March Madness. You just finished watching that AT&T ad on the big screen. Do you know how much those quick thirty-second ads cost?…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays