Argumentative Essay Of Banning Boxing

Abstract: Boxing, these past few years, has been recognized as a brutal sport by society. This piece discusses how boxing shouldn't be banned, as it is the sport that benefits humans in many different aspects of life, also discusses how boxing is viewed by various people of various classes as a cruel sport that needs to be banned for different reasons, that eventually in the essay, will be rebutted with clear and explicit arguments with adequate use of data and analysis to support the claim of the writer. The findings indicate that people that participate in boxing benefit them both physically and mentally. While those benefits are aside, our opponents believed that boxing has a risk of developing many different diseases that cannot be reformed that will eventually cause a long-term effect on the people's lives, therefore they believed it should be banished and banned for the sake of people's rights and for the sake of the bettering of the future and also …show more content…
Leclerc and Herrera (1999) suspect that rules are the only way to avoid terrible injuries and could reduce the risk of it happening, so if there isn’t any strict and firm rules for the fighters to go through, then boxing is going to be very destructive and could end people's lives, therefore it should be banned. I partially agree with the fact that boxing without rules and regulations should be banned because of its negative and destructive affects it has on people's lives, but in professional boxing there are many strict rules that do have consequences if avoided, examples of these rules are (No hitting below the belt, no hitting above the shoulders, hitting on the back of the head or neck, kidney punching) and many others that aren’t permitted during the contest, these rules can eliminate the possibility of a knock out, therefore making the sport safe and easily