Should Adolescents Make Their Own Medical Decisions?

Decent Essays
Adolescents should not have the right to make their own medical decisions, this would be very unsafe for the patient and possibly for the people around them, also adolescents are not mature enough to take on the responsibility in the decision making and the decision the adolescent might make might not be the best choice.
Giving the adolescent decision making privileges on his/her medical choice could be very dangerous, not just to the adolescent but to the people around him/her. He/She could very easily make the wrong decision and then be stuck with it for the rest of their life, causing him/her and their families pain and suffering. The adolescent could make a decision and not know all the facts causing themselves more issues than before. Therefor the parent/guardian should make the decisions.
…show more content…
The main reason is that they would not have all the knowledge in making the decision, unlike the parent would. For example if a child under the age of 5 was to make the decision of having to do surgery or some other kind of treatment the outcome could result in death, unlike maturer individuals over the age of 18. Most adolescents do not have the wisdom it requires to make your own medical decisions. "Parents have the responsibility and authority to make medical decisions on behalf of their children." https://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/parent.html. With that being said I believe that the parent/ guardian should be doing the decision

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The policy should state: minors who are fighting any type of cancer should be allowed to choose whether to continue or stop treatment at any point. Minors are under 18 years old, but this does not mean they should undergo pain and suffering to prolong their life, when all they want is a quality life while they are still living. Minors are young, but they are the ones going through the pain, so they should not let anyone else inflict harm on them if they want to put an end to it. Autonomy is the power of the person to make their own decisions. Forcing treatment breaks the ethical principle of autonomy.…

    • 482 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case: Dr. Smith, was a practicing physician in a small town. He was looking after Hansen's family from the birth of their 2 children. One afternoon Mrs Hansen came to the office with her oldest son, Jacob, who was 15 years of age. The kid was under Dr. Smith care from the birth, he knew this bright boy very well. Recently he advised his mom that he will start seeing the boy alone without mom supervision in the exam room.…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Minors have the right to confidentiality regarding their sexual activity, orientation, birth control, and many other aspects of this type of healthcare. Without ensuring this confidential access, many minors would simply not seek any services for fear…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off you will need to know what an adolescent is, it a young adult. To make an autonomous medical choice is to make a medical decision yourself without an adult. I believe they do and they don’t. Adolescents under 16 should not be able to make autonomous medical choices.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year between 700 and 800 adolescents ages 11 - 17 undergo a type of organ transplant. But before they must go through this surgery, they are the ones making the decision to go ahead with it. One example of this poor policy is Courtney Montgomery, who had been battling heart problems her whole life. She refused to undergo a heart transplant to save her life, as a result of past transplants which were temporally and didn’t remove the problem, she had given up hope. Believing she made the right choice, doctors showed her Josh Winstead, who convinced her to save to undergo the transplant to save her life.…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Alyson Minors Decisions There are so many discussions on whether a minor should have control over their own medical care. The world has a divided opinion of what the law should be. Are those that are for parental controls only agreeing for personal gratifications and satisfactions? Are those that disagree only those minors who wish their voices were heard on a life changing decision.…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose to discuss was about adolescent bariatric surgery. The ethical principle involved is beneficence vs nonmaleficence. The ethical issue involved, is knowing when is it okay to perform bariatric surgery on an adolescent patient. The surgeons have to weigh out the risks vs the benefits.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This also raises the issue of parents determine hair or eye color of their child and aborting it in hopes of trying for a different color. This ability to know information of the child…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Over the years the law has been that adolescents can’t make a autonomous medical choice without an adult or guardian over 18, but everyone has their own opinions on this topic but the question is, Do Adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choice? and my answer for that is yes and no, I’m going to explain my reasoning for yes and then no, so first yes because us kids or teens It’s our bodies we can make our own decision or if our parent or guardian make a decision we don’t like we can say no because we might feel scared or not feel comfortable but for example, If their is a birthday party we can have a choice on Whether we want to go or we don’t want to go, but there’s not many pros on the topic but then my other answer is no…

    • 374 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mature Minor Doctrine

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This doctrine will help teens who have children or are declared independent more than teens in good standing with their families. These teenagers deserve to be allowed to refuse treatment because they are deemed mature, their life experiences have prepared them, and they understand the treatments. Teenagers should be allowed to refuse treatment because they are treated like adults when it comes to trials and abortion. In some states, teenagers are allowed to get an abortion without parental permission. The consequences of getting an abortion is far more worse than getting chemotherapy.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Reproductive Decisions

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Many people question the thought of allowing adolescents to make autonomous decisions, which means allowing kids the age of 12 and 18 to make medical chocies on their own. There are many positive and negative sides to the answer as to whether or not adolescents should have that right. Personally I agree to the thought of allowing them to make these decisions because some adolescents have the judgement skills needed to make health related chocies. During this age most are transitioning from a child to an adult, and their thinking skills become more mature. Most are able to make the right decisions regarding their health.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And if kids that age aren’t aloud to make any other decisions why would you put their whole life in their hands? They aren’t old enough to even know what they want in life yet, we are steadily changing our minds we can’t even get up and decide what we want to wear in the morning much less making our own medical decisions. When you think of medical decisions you may not think much about it but when you dig deeper there is so much more and that’s why I see this as such a big deal, it’s not in any shape or form something to just mess around with and not put a lot of thought into. This is our lives were talking about we need people with maturity not just a kid that is still growing up and learning about life.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Specifically, if teens are not entitled to be in the office without parent consent that would just make them not even want to come at all. It could hurt them drastically when it came to having to get a screening, check up, testing, or anything.(American Civil ).Teens should not have to even be in the situation to be too scared to go to a doctor's office because of getting caught. They could no longer just be taking care of themselves, and since they have to have parental consent, it makes them stay far away as possible. Teens should not have parental consent because it could lead to diseases, an increasingly amount of pregnancies, and health…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Cassandra Case Summary

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The court’s decision was based on its authority to overrule parents when their medical decisions threaten the life or health of their offspring. There are two medical ethic…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays