Should Adolescents Make Autonomous Medical Choices?

Improved Essays
Personally, I do highly believe that Adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choices but this is a highly argumentative subject. I feel as if my parents shouldn’t have to confirm everything about me, for I am my own person by 15 even though they still look at me as their “baby-girl”. Lets face it by 15 i’m not so much of a baby anymore, i’m not completely grown yet but i’m far enough away from the baby stage and am perfectly capable to make my own decisions by now. Parents have the right to make choices for us as children but I don’t feel it’s necessary by the time we hit the “Adolescent” stage in life because by then we have the right mind and knowledge about things to make our own decisions. Each person is their own person once they hit about 15 and plus …show more content…
How does it help you once you can finally make your own choices? It doesn’t at all. Instead, it makes it to where you will always feel the need to depend on someone else. It will make you not be able to ever make it on your own, especially when it comes to making your own serious medical decisions. But on the other hand ifIt you would have been able to make your own decisions at 15 it would have given you more knowledge on it, and you could have then worked your way up from that point rather than just being put out on your own completely at 18 and making it so devastating to yourself when you finally have no choice about making your own decisions. It’s my body, not any adults. I’m the only one who knows how I feel at times, and If i’m in pain then i’m the only one feeling the pain so why should another person make the decision for me? Many parents do not agree on much, so if my parent was to disagree and make a choice for me that I don’t agree with then i’m stuck living with whatever my parents decide on and that isn’t right. I should be able to fully make my own medical decisions without the approval of a parent or guardian, since the fact that it’s my body and i’m the one who has to live

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    5.07 Case 18

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This is why I believe that the age to make your own legal medical decision should be before one turns 18 so that In the case there are no parents or guardians present a child can make their own decision. This hypothetical situation could become real very fast in the case of a plane/ car crash, a murder or any number of different things that could happen to a person’s parents. This could even happen if one does not reside with their parents due to arguments etc. In these situations these people will most likely still need medical treatment if something is not right.…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the debate between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt, each of these men agree that competent patients have this privilege; however, they do not agree on when the patient has the right to use this privilege. Cowart’s argument favors healthcare professionals allowing patients to use their free will at any given moment regardless of the positive or negative outcomes of his or her decision. I agree with Cowart’s argument pertaining to the rights of patients. Cowart discusses how patient autonomy…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mature minor doctrine is a common law policy or a patient right accepting that an unemancipated minor patient may possess the maturity to choose or reject a particular health care treatment, sometimes without the knowledge or agreement of parents, and should be permitted to do so. If the evidence is clear and convincing that the minor is mature enough to appreciate the consequences of her actions, and that the minor is mature enough to exercise the judgment of an adult, then the mature minor doctrine affords her the common law right to consent to or refuse medical treatment [including life and death cases, with some considerations. If we see the Cruzan v. Director, Missouri department of Health case, it argues that competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing medical treatment under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. But incompetent persons do not enjoy the same rights, because they cannot make voluntary and informed decisions. Another legal issue that needs to be answered is that by supporting Jack his father is risking the life of the child.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A person’s autonomy is a privilege that is earned through the knowledge gained through life experiences. For children, the right to decide is withdrawn because the parent’s are thought to know what is best in the circumstances concerning their children. The ability to understand and comprehend the severity of illness or the consequences of decisions is lacking in adolescents. They are deemed incapable of making informed decisions thus incompetent; therefore, the parents are given the authority to provide or deny consent on behalf of their children. Similarly, elderly who are experiencing deteriorating illnesses may have an altered competence due to being in denial or having fear of the outcome.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Minors have the right to confidentiality regarding their sexual activity, orientation, birth control, and many other aspects of this type of healthcare. Without ensuring this confidential access, many minors would simply not seek any services for fear…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, this is a choice. Mol said, “The logic of choice is tension. As long as individual health is at stake, the logic of choice wants individuals to make their own choices” (p.70). I can agree with this to a certain extent.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever been apart of a community where you have to give up some of your rights? Have they ever told you you can’t do that or do this? Well, I believe that isn’t right. I don’t think they should get to decide what you do and don’t do. Some of the reasons why I think that shouldn’t be allowed is it’s your life…

    • 475 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally feel that human beings are autonomous and no one has a right to tell them how to treat their own bodies or lead their lives, as long as they do not harm anyone else. I have wrestled with the moralities of these issues for much of my adult life, but upon researching the origins of the opposing arguments my philosophical wrestling match has become much more complicated than it used to…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    states an anonymous user on Debate.com. There are many reasons as to why teen girls should not be able to have access to contraceptives without the approval of parents. Teens should have to be comfortable talking with their parents before being comfortable doing it with someone and live with the consequences.…

    • 466 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    No longer having your parents telling you what to do, how to do it, or when. You have a chance to gain control over your own life. It is your responsibility to make it to classes and pass them, you may do it out of fear of your parents, but no more being told what to do. You manage yourself, you control what you spend money on. Once you run out of money, you quickly learn how to manage your own money.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Just because individuals are human they have the same rights and values as every other human being. These rights include freedom, autonomy, and privacy. The downside to this theory is that it can create “individualistic selfish behavior” (Fremgen, 2016, p. 11). Parental involvement in the minor’s sexual health decisions would go against the minor’s rights of making autonomous decisions about their healthcare (Girma and Paton, 2013).…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    If a person has a right to life, liberty, and happiness, then an individual should have the freedom to make important decisions regarding his/her life. Everyone has a right to life which means that a person’s right to live should be protected. If a patient who is terminally ill and mentally competent no longer wants to live, then the patient’s right to receive assisted suicide should be protected. Others should not interfere with a person’s right to make that decision because they would be disrespecting a person’s freedom. Moreover, patients have the right to not receive any medical treatment, and a patient can decide not to receive any treatment even if the treatment can save the person’s life.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Though it may be against religious beliefs and individual wishes, a person should be in complete control of their own life. For many people,…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, those who are supporting forcing teens to notify or get consent from their parents to “promote the best interests of young women and improve family communications” fail to realize they are stripping teens of their right of privacy which is unconstitutional. In France, the government pays for girls to have birth control without parental consent, and as the government pays for it, that adds another level of privacy. They are doing this because they believe it will “reduce the teen pregnancy rate” (Judy Molland) which they think is also due to “ignorance, taboo and lack of access to contraception” (Judy Molland). Many do not see keeping contraception’s away from teens as a safe way to keep them from having sex or running into sexual…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays