Should Adolescents Have The Right To Make Medical Choices Essay

Improved Essays
In this essay i will be talking about if adolescents have the right to make medical choices. I think Adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choices depending on the choice. Adolescents should not have the choice on what kind of medical care they get. but I think they should have the choice on a pill or a liquid medicine. I also believe that kids or young adults can make bad decisions. Adolescents should have the right to make choices if they are mature enough to make the choice because some adolescents are not as mature as others. Adolescents 16 and under tend to make bad medical choices. I think adolescents would be safer for an adult to make choices for them it would save many teens from pregnancy or STD’s. If parents have …show more content…
This topic places medical decisions at the forefront meaning that the topic touches on questions of terminal illness, pregnancy, sexual transmitted diseases, palliative care, and other types of decisions that minors have to make. Currently, the legal systems evaluation of minors is based on the notion that children are generally viewed as sacrosanct. This means adolescents exist in a very interesting space-as people developing into adults, adolescents are not in need of as much protection as children, but they still might lack some of the cognitive function of those who have reached their adulthood.Through providing adolescents with the ability to make their own medical decisions, the affirmative argues that we can achieve justice through the recognition of autonomy.Adolescents are generally able to make their own choices. It differs from the Affirmative, because it requests a presumption that medical decisions should be shared between adolescents and their parents. In this method, medical decisions become a tool that parents can use, with the support of doctors, in order to help allow their adolescents develop into competent, responsible decision

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    5.07 Case 18

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Have you ever met a person who didn’t have any parents or guardians ? Did you ever think about what might happen if something bad were to happen to them and they needed medical treatment?. You probably didn’t but that’s fine it’s not your job to worry about but this is a situation that could possibly happen so if it did what would they do?…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Test Item #2: The definition of the word autonomy means to be self-determined or to have free will. Patients, who are competent and are of an appropriate age, all have the ability to be autonomous when it comes to making decisions about their healthcare.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A person’s autonomy is a privilege that is earned through the knowledge gained through life experiences. For children, the right to decide is withdrawn because the parent’s are thought to know what is best in the circumstances concerning their children. The ability to understand and comprehend the severity of illness or the consequences of decisions is lacking in adolescents. They are deemed incapable of making informed decisions thus incompetent; therefore, the parents are given the authority to provide or deny consent on behalf of their children. Similarly, elderly who are experiencing deteriorating illnesses may have an altered competence due to being in denial or having fear of the outcome.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Two problems are occurring concurrently in the case of Fran. The first involves the parents attempt to force Fran to continue life-sustaining cancer treatments when she has made up her mind that she no longer wishes to continue the treatments. She has come to the decision that her quality of life has diminished and she wants to enjoy the time she has left. The second problem involves the parent’s threat to take Fran to court in attempt to have her judged incompetent, thereby allowing them to take control of her treatment.…

    • 785 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article called ‘Involving Children in Medical Decisions’ written by author Kenny Harrison purposes an argument that children should be allowed to have a say in their medical care decisions. The point of Harrisons article is that children should be allowed to be part of the decision-making process when it comes to their own health. He discusses that the family-centered is the best approach as it considers everyone’s decisions, concerns and questions while making sure the child the priority. Harrison discusses that the assumption ‘parents know what is best for their child’ is used in other decision making situations, in medical care, Harrison explains that when parents are in a state of distress they often dismiss their child concerns/wishes. He discusses that the child is the only person who truly knows the pain, and suffering they are going through, and with allowing the child to have a say in medical decisions, the child can decide based on their level of pain experience.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Personally, I do highly believe that Adolescents have the right to make autonomous medical choices but this is a highly argumentative subject. I feel as if my parents shouldn’t have to confirm everything about me, for I am my own person by 15 even though they still look at me as their “baby-girl”. Lets face it by 15 i’m not so much of a baby anymore, i’m not completely grown yet but i’m far enough away from the baby stage and am perfectly capable to make my own decisions by now. Parents have the right to make choices for us as children but I don’t feel it’s necessary by the time we hit the “Adolescent” stage in life because by then we have the right mind and knowledge about things to make our own decisions.…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Minors have the right to confidentiality regarding their sexual activity, orientation, birth control, and many other aspects of this type of healthcare. Without ensuring this confidential access, many minors would simply not seek any services for fear…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question of whether or not minors under the age of 18 should be treated differently when being read their rights has come up in the current news. There are differences between minors and adults, “Children are different from adults. The Supreme Court has in other contexts concluded that children cannot be viewed as "mini adults" under the law because they lack the maturity and foresight to understand the full consequences of their actions. The same holds true when they are considered suspects and are being questioned by law enforcement officers,”(“How Should Police Read…”).…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First off you will need to know what an adolescent is, it a young adult. To make an autonomous medical choice is to make a medical decision yourself without an adult. I believe they do and they don’t. Adolescents under 16 should not be able to make autonomous medical choices.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    1.3.1 Case Laws: 1.3.2 The Gillick competence Both at common law and statutory provisions, children have the capacity to perform certain acts and take certain decisions even without the consent of their parents or guardians. The critical question is whether the child has reached the age of maturity and has the capacity to make those decision or actions. Ms Gillick brought a court case against both the Council and the Health Authority about contraception, which she argues was unlawful, on the grounds that it is causing or empowering unlawful sex with children under 16 years, and contravenes s 28(1) of the Sexual Offenses Act 1956, or the offense of being an accomplice to unlawful sex with children under 16, as opposed to s 6(1) of that Act.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Minor Consent And Refusal

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This paper attempts to explore the health laws surrounding minor consent and refusal in Canada. Throughout this paper, particular attention will be given to a case AC vs. Manitoba [2009] within the Supreme Court of Canada and Van Mol vs. Ashmore [1999], within the British Columbia Court of Appeal. Many legalities and ethical issues surround this topic and concerns arise when particular decisions are made on behalf of the minor. Canadian federal legislation considers anyone under the age of sixteen a minor. The age of a minor is not the only considering factor to medical consent, but rather capacity to make informed decisions.…

    • 1315 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Education is important although it can be expensive it’s worth it. The essay” Yes, A College Education is Worth the Cost” written by Rodney K. Smith, is another example of why investing in education pays off at the end. Sometimes students think education is boring or hard to get. Other times individual think they just waste too much money and don’t see anything in return, but once they are done they become thankful and proud that they did it.…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Medical Marijuana Autonomy

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Medical Marijuana and the Principles of Autonomy The right to determine what shall be done with one’s body is a fundamental right in our society. It is the patient’s rights to decide whether what medical treatment they receive. I argue that based on the principles of autonomy that it is someone’s freedom and right to do what they please with their body. I argue that medical marijuana should be legal if we all have personal autonomy.…

    • 1358 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical dilemma I chose is the case of Cassandra C., a 17-year-old teenager who refused chemotherapy treatment to treat Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The problem that this case produces is a conflict between two ethical principles; respect for autonomy and beneficence. Respect for autonomy is respecting the individual’s rights to say no to a treatment if wanted to do so and beneficence is an ethical principle in which it directs doctors and physicians to strive to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. When Cassandra declined further treatment, the doctors were confused on how to do their job and how to do it well. Cassandra is still legally a minor, which means that a parent has the right to decide on her behalf.…

    • 1109 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Teens Be Allowed to Purchase Contraceptives Without Parental Consent? Three in ten teen American girls will get pregnant by the age of twenty which is approximately about 750,000 teen pregnancies every year, and one in four teens contract a sexually transmitted disease every year. With this being said there is a huge debate on whether teens should be allowed to purchase contraceptives without parental consent. Teens should be allowed to purchase these contraceptives due to the fact teens will continue to have sex with or without parental consent leading teens to put their health at risk, teens will turn to illegal options to receive them, and it helps people from low income families that can’t afford to go to a doctor to get them.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays