The government should never control what people can or can’t do when it comes to their bodies or private life, if the government tries to intrude …show more content…
I agree that the cost of having someone on the death penalty and putting someone through it is very expensive but for a the victims families it can be the only form of closure available to them. The death penalty is also said to be too “harsh” of a punishment but I think if a criminal murders someone or rapes someone then that is totally justifiable for the death penalty. Of course the extra time and ridiculous cost of the death penalty is frowned upon, but I do think that the version of the death penalty can be vastly improved …show more content…
Budziszewski said “In retribution the spur is the virtue of indignation, which answers injury with injury for public good. Retribution is the primary purpose of just punishment as such. Rehabilitation, protection, and deterrence have a lesser status in punishment than retribution.” (early orthodox). Those who just serve a sentence can be let out early because of good behavior and before you know it they’re back in a society which they already proved that they are incapable of living in.
Not only women but everybody should have the right to do whatever they want with their body and have the right to have privacy when making a decision especially when it’s about abortion, we all don’t know the circumstances of the abortion and that’s okay because in reality why should we care what a stranger decides that does not even affect us? Truthfully I’m not one hundred percent sold on the death penalty because there are problems with it but I still support it because the atrocities people commit deserve a punishment that is