Examples Of Abortion By Judithvis Thomson

Great Essays
For Judith Jarvis Thomson abortion is something that should be a negative right, provided that it has certain guide lines. One in which abortions are neither a right that should be given or taken away. Thomson begins by arguing that there is no right time to mark the point in which a person should begin to be considered a person. She then gives an example of an oak tree and how it is not called an oak tree at the beginning, but goes through stages to become an oak tree. For people to claim that a fetus is a person without going through the stages is considered to be “slippery slope argument” by Thomson’s account. But Thomson does agree that a fetus becomes a person at some point before it’s born, even though there is no indication to when …show more content…
Therefore a fetus would have greater right to life, then the women who conserved it. Thomson then goes on to give an analogy about a famous violinist. If this violinist were to be ill and people kidnapped and used you as a living machine to keep him alive, for any given amount of days, months, or years his right to live, would then outweigh your right to your own body. Comparing kidnapping to being raped Thomson claims that rape victims wouldn’t be morally wrong to having an abortion. Moving forward Thomson argues that rape victims alone cannot have the choice to abortion for the reasoning that it would create a rift between who has a right to life, those conceived by rape or …show more content…
Thomson claims that if a person doesn’t have any rights against you then you would just be morally indecent to not allow them some level of right to life. So even if a person were to be rude, mean, petty etc. it still wouldn’t be unjust for them to refuse to help keep a person alive. Thomson then explains, if people supported one person’s right to another’s right to life, then what’s to stop them from supporting that other person’s right to life. Furthermore, Thomson rejection the argument that loosely claims that people have a right against those who will not help them if it is an easy enough

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Don Marquis argues in his article An Argument that Abortion is Wrong that abortion, except in specific rare instances is seriously wrong. He bases this claim off of the principle that killing any innocent human being is wrong. While the central point of most pro-choice individuals is that women should have the right to control their body, Marquis argues that the right of the unborn fetus outweighs the right for a woman to control her body. Before supporting his thesis Marquis lays out one of the main problems in the abortion debate. People in favor of abortion often have a very narrow view on what constitutes a person and this is problematic because it leaves out infants, severely retarded and mentally ill individuals.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this argument, the limitation placed on the right to life is taking resources from others. One example would be needing an organ transplant. Needing an organ to survive does not entitle you to take it from someone else, and it does not entitle you to certain other resources, like the best hospital or the soonest transplant time. Thomson follows this argument to its logical conclusion. If a fetus has a right to life, but the right to life has limitations on what resources you can take from other people, then the fetus has no right to the body of the woman carrying it.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These cases are supposed to be analogous to cases of rape, threat to life, or when a woman has taken reasonable precautions not to get pregnant. Thomson does not, however she concludes that abortion is justified in any and every case. There is a moral requirement to be a Minimally Decent Samaritan as Thomson puts it, and this makes a late abortion wrong if it is done just for the sake of convenience. To use her example, it would be wrong for a woman in her seventh month of pregnancy to get an abortion just to avoid the nuisance of postponing a trip…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless, a person’s right to life is stronger than the mother’s right to her body Therefore, the fetus may not be killed and the abortion may not be performed The premise that Thomson rejects is premise 3 (Therefore, the fetus has a right to life.) It can also be said that Thomson rejects premise 3 by questioning what “right to life” in premise 1 (Every person has a right to life.)…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Thomson created a very strong, concise argument in defending abortion, in which she believes that it is not morally plausible to deny a mother complete rights and jurisdiction over her own body when impregnated. Ultimately, I believe the person carrying the fetus has the right to decide whether to abort or not, which defends Thomson’s argument. Thomson discusses certain thought-experiments which are hypothetical situations that I believe help prove the point that abortion is necessary in many situations. Without the option of abortion, women will be forced to have children that they are unprepared for, leading to more neglected children. Also, not to mention the fact that in many cases, pregnancy leads to medical complications that can only be solved through abortion or else the mother will die.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Judith Jarvis Thomson who studied at Cambridge University, she is an American philosopher who focuses on morals and abortion. She is well known for her work, “A Defense of Abortion” which she wrote about a woman's write to control her body and a fetus's right to life. The problem that she decided to spend most her time philosophizing on was abortion. Abortion has been a controversial topic for hundreds of years and Thomson decided to break it down to the basics and philosophize. Within Thomson’s essay she had multiple sections in her paper, The Basic Argument, The extreme view, What the Right to Life Is Not, and What the Right to Life Is.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thomson also says that allowing someone to use your body is different from them having the right to. When the violinist was attached to her she never gave him the right to use her body but say may see it as a moral obligation to allow him to use her body. For anyone to see what that truly feels like they would need to be put in that situation but overall it would be an internal conflict between morally doing what is right and what you would want for yourself. It would either be you choosing the “right” thing to do or everyone being mad at you for choosing what is best for you and your baby, or in that case what is right for the violinist.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thus, if abortion is justifiable, then abortion is morally permissible. John Noonan, on the other hand, argues that once the fetus has been conceived that gives it a right to life and to end its life would be impermissible. In order for abortion to be justifiable, Thompson must use many scenarios to explain why an abortion is justified…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Thomson addresses John Paul II’s missed premise about the content to the right to life, leads his argument to be an invalid conclusion. She also touches upon and disagrees that the fetus’s rights outweigh that of the mother whereas Paul II believes otherwise. Warren chooses to elaborate Thomson's objections with the argument of what constitutes as person, and personhood, with the five traits that a fetus does not satisfy. Thus, according to these counterarguments the traditional argument loses its validity; leading to my own conclusion that the argument is invalid. References: Thomson, J. (1971).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion is one of the most controversial and heated issues in the United States today. There are two different views on this controversy. There are those who are pro-choice, whom believe that woman have the right to choose to have an abortion or not. Then, there are those who are pro-life, whom believe that a fetus should have right to life. Marry Warren, the author of “Abortion is Morally Permissible”, falls under the category of being pro-choice.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Patrick Lee’s and Robert P. George’s, On The Wrong of Abortion, it is argued that abortions are objectively immoral. To support this conclusion, Lee and George state that, the fetus is a complete person in an immature phase of development, that the fetus has the potential to develop into a “person” and that abortions are intentional killings. Pro-Choice defenders argue that a human fetus is not a human being because it cannot live on its own, that they are not ‘people’, and that the mother has the executive decision of not wanting the child in her uterus. According to Patrick Lee in another one of his works, The Pro-Life Argument from Substantial Identity: A Defence. Bioethics , He claims that “What makes it wrong to kill you or me now would…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Anne Warren presents her argument for abortion, first, by replying to Thomson’s argument with falsehoods she gathered from his premises. The largest opposition Warren had with Thompson, was based upon the statement he made that allowed for abortion to be permissible even if the fetus has a full right to life. Warren argues that there cannot be an argument for abortion if it is believed that a fetus has a full right to life, because an abortion would immediately dismiss this. In Warren’s argument, she focuses heavily on defining personhood and the moral status that coincides with it, and the lack of both in a fetus. I am going to argue on behalf of Warren, however adding the argument that a fetus does not have full moral status, while an infant does, in hopes to respond to the issue of infanticide.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She isn’t claiming that abortions are always permissible or that it is permissible to secure the death of an unborn child. I do not believe in abortion for reasons I will not address at this time and therefore am not claiming to feel the same Thomson does about all of her arguments, but I do agree that the “right to life” argument is not a solid one. With the analogies Thomson set out, it is clear that cases must be looked at individually because the details make all the difference. I feel she succeeds in her goal. She challenges the way I feel about abortion and requires that I justify my reasons for or against it for more than just the fetus’s “right to…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    She suggests that because a pregnancy is such a great sacrifice, that, while women should carry a child to term after becoming pregnant, we cannot require them to do so. This argument also requires that the fetus’ right to life is subject to the mother’s whim and does not carry as much weight as the first two arguments. Thomson concludes the article by saying that she is not attempting to delineate the circumstances in which a pregnancy might be morally permissible and those in which it isn’t, but rather to make it clear that even if we consider a fetus to be a person, that abortion can still be morally permissible. This weakens her argument a great deal, instead of providing a proscriptive criterion to base the morality of abortion on, she simply provides what may be a series of fringe cases to establish that while abortion is normally wrong, it isn’t always so. Thomson’s argument on abortion is fundamentally deontological.…

    • 1880 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays

Related Topics