People often overlook their impact on the world around them, and when doing so they cause more disquietude. Lack of self-awareness can create an array of disruptions, including harm to others and conflict. Specifically, in Eckles’ situation, his negligence for his surroundings led to a major change in the outcome of a presidential election. This cause and effect relationship of this is apparent through the commentary, “a small thing that could upset balances and knock down a line of small dominoes and then big dominoes and then gigantic dominoes” (Bradbury). This communicates that even the most insignificant acts can cause an outbreak of results.
Predominantly, Eckles’ struggle highlights the notion that every decision has corresponding outcomes. Whereas, Eckles was blind to the impact of his existence, his disruption in the past caused prominent changes in the future. In this instance his choice to flee the hunt and take shelter on the ground altered a critical election for the worse. Conclusively, the short story supports the concept that all decisions carry potential complications and ultimately play crucial roles in the development of the