Shooting An Elephant Imperialism

Superior Essays
“Shooting an Elephant”
“Shooting an Elephant” is about the guilt of British colonialism that George Orwell faces as a sub-divisional police officer. Based on his experiences, he has seen the real wickedness of imperialism. In “Shooting an Elephant”, Orwell displays the evil of imperialism as harsh, belligerent, and provoking.
First, Orwell encounters the harshness of imperialism. Orwell says, “ the sneering yellow faces of young men… the insults hooted me when I was at a safe distance.”(323) The evil of imperialism has made the Burmese furious. Imperialism has resulted into the in the Burmese to lash out. Because they are impoverished, they’re reacting in the only way they know how. The Burmese lacks the extra resources; they can’t fight back
…show more content…
In particular Orwell says, “ It had already destroyed somebody’s bamboo hut, killed a cow and raided some fruit stalls…”(324) As a result, the evil of imperialism has taken over all of their belongings. They are already poor because of the taking over of England. Orwell even mentions that these things happened in the poor quarter of Moulmein, Burma. The elephant is killing their food and shelter. Orwell shows the parallelism between the elephant and the British empire; the British has invaded their country just like the elephant has invaded the town. They have already lost so much to the evil of imperialism, and it has become very aggressive and hostile. Because of their loss, they also were eager to get to the elephant. Thereafter Orwell states, “ Burmans were bringing dahs and baskets even before I left…”(330) The Burmese no longer get to just live; they now have to survive. They not only look at the elephant as a harm to the town, but they look at it as a resource of food since everything is so limited, and everyone is on edge and is very hostile. It becomes every person for themselves, yet the Burmese has to take care of their families. Because everything is so limited, the resources mean so much more to them. Due to the elephant being a resource for food, the Burmese become more combative towards the elephant. Later Orwell says, “the scarred …show more content…
For instance Orwell says, “ they had seen the rifle and were all shouting excitedly that I was going to shoot the elephant.”(325) Due to all the chaos, he is put into the position where he is starting to feel the pressure from the Burmese. Orwell wants to do the right thing; the evil of imperialism has restricted how far he’s willing to go. Orwell displays the good versus evil and he is placed in the middle. The evil of imperialism has caused Orwell to do things that he never thought he would do. The pressure of the shouting people is provoking; however, he wants the Burmese to know that he is on their side. Because when he first saw the elephant and it was minding its own business, he didn’t want to shoot the elephant. Orwell doesn’t want them to perceive that he agrees with what’s going on, and he wants to feel accepted and portrayed a better light from the Burmese. Then Orwell later says, “It was an immense crowd, two thousand at the least and growing by the minute.”(326) The intensity that the Burmese has forced upon him became very congesting. He is put in a tough position; he can’t find a way out. He is facing the peer pressure from the Burmese. This leads Orwell into shooting the elephant three times. The people and the environment have led Orwell into this moment. He shot the elephant because he thought he was doing the Burmese a favor. He convinced himself that he was doing the right thing. In

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Gorge, Orwell writes about an elephant in his essay “Shooting an Elephant” where the main craters is a police man for the British emperor in one of the eastern countries. This police man has an internal power struggle with his duty and internal feelings of what he knows as right. In this country he imply about how the people there are cage and are oppressed by the British Emperor he is also concern with his duty and how the people view him. Even though the policeman is authority figure he takes on the role of the tyrant.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orwell’s experiences in Burma deeply disturb him and he admits that, “[he] had already made up [his] mind that imperialism was an evil thing and the sooner [he] chucked [his] job and got out of it the better” (181). The weight of his duties forced on him by the British crown, makes Orwell privately sympathize with the Burmese people and he confesses that he is secretly, “…all for the Burmese and all against the oppressors, the British” (181). Unlike Orwell, who shares his experience as a reluctant oppressor, Douglass’ experience as a young African American boy born into the cold iron-clad shackles of slavery, offers valuable insight from the perspective of the oppressed on how an institution can destroy the morality of those who comply with…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Destructive Elephant in the Room Throughout time, empire-building has resulted in tenfold more destruction than contributions to the world. From the Mongols to the Nazis, humans have always exhibited their greedy nature by seeking more land without minding the effects. Those left in imperialism’s aftermath experience profound cultural effects such as those seen in “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell. The tone begins as acrimonious and bitter then shifts to introspectiveness and strife, highlighting the officer’s views of how Burma and its foreign culture has changed his character.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His humiliation and sense of defeatare conveyed through his compelling words. He shows the audience that through this incident, hereceives a “better glimpse than [he] had had before of the real nature of imperialism — the realmotives for which despotic governments act” (Orwell).The whole essay, with its appeals of ethosand pathos, uses of imagery, and satirical techniques, boils down to the irony between theoutward and inward appearances of a British authority figure in Burma, or any other state withinthe British sphere of influence. This irony shows how imperialism ruins everyone involved— starting from the inner core. Orwell, George. "Shooting an Elephant.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difficulties of the speaker are established from the very first sentence. White skin is the bullet-proof barrier between the narrator and the people of Burma, and this separation brings on more persecution to the typically powerful white man. “...[they did not] have anything to do except stand on street corners and jeer at Europeans” (Orwell 1). In the beginning, the physical setting is not so distinctly defined as the social setting--persecution makes its way to the narrator and people like him from every corner of the Burmese public, ranging from dirty looks to spoken jeers. When the story nears the place of the elephant, the physical setting is more clearly described.…

    • 1163 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are more Burmans than there are police officers, over ruling them in a way. The pressure that the people put on Orwell crushes…

    • 1065 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fakhara, Rabab E.L.A B30 Mrs. Tabitha, Booth Feb. 28, 2017 Compare and Contrast Essay Everyone has their own values that they deal with, some are more important than others while some we forget to follow. We lose some of our values because we start valuing the values of others in our peer group, just to fit in. Everyone deals with their values differently. Both stories are more different than similar , where one character gives up his value to support another value while the other character gives up everything to maintain his values. “Shooting the elephant” depicts the story of a young officer who has to decide whether to follow his own path or the path that the majority wants him to follow.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Think Twice Before You Shoot In “Shooting an Elephant,” from The Norton Reader, George Orwell explains his personal experience in an imperialistic county where he feels as though he is forced to shoot an elephant that had escaped into a town killing a man. His thoughts were not set on killing the wild animal but under circumstances, Orwell felt as though he would be seen as a fool to the natives if he did not live up to the expectation of the natives to kill the elephant. Once Orwell shot the elephant he had to watch as it lay slowly dying, seemingly not wanting to die the elephant remained to hold on to the life he had left. Orwell ends up killing the elephant once and for all after many brutal attempts, and then he sits analyzing weather…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    George Orwell faces multiple conflicts in Shooting an Elephant. The first is British imperialism. The British took over Burma and they are treating the natives terribly. Second, the natives aren’t taking this imperial government kindly either as they continuously mock Orwell because he’s a symbol of the government and a vulnerable “obvious target” (Orwell). Orwell hates the way the British impose their power on the Burmese.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part 1: Exploring “Shooting An Elephant” by George Orwell 1. What words could you use to describe the character that Orwell makes of himself in this piece? He illustrates himself as vulnerable, powerless, weak and, someone who seeks for acceptance. He is also sympathetic yet confused.…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the story of the elephant Mr. Orwell paints a picture of another type of inner conflict that he experienced while working in Burma. That is, when one knows deep inside what they should rightly do, but due to outside pressures and influences they choose another course of action. The anecdote is about an elephant that is out of control and is ravaging a village. George Orwell is called out to neutralize the situation, but he does not know what he can do to help things. When he arrived at the scene he was told the elephant got away to paddy fields a thousand yards away.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After working as an imperialistic police for England George Orwell saw fist had the good and the bad that comes with imperializing a country. Three important symbols that come together to give a vivid description in Orwell’s “shooting an Elephant” are , the rifle, the elephant, and the villagers. A rifle can be week, powerful, large, or small. The rifle in Orwell’s “shooting an Elephant” fistly represents England 's power. England was losing its power as a rifle can as it ages.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “Shooting an Elephant” his exact feelings about imperialism was that it is an “evil thing”; thus the reader knows his position right away. The story begins with a mad elephant running loose and the Burmese call on Orwell to kill the animal. Therefore, Orwell makes a troublesome decision on the hunt for the elephant. In the end, he shoots the elephant to, in a way save face from the locals. As a result, the elephant dies slowly and painfully.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the essay “Shooting an Elephant”, it is based on a man who is pressured to kill an elephant that was thought to be wild. This adventure took place in Moulmein, in Lower Burma. Could he have saved this elephant and done what his heart wanted to do? Or was the peer pressure by others to strong? Orwell withheld the…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, Orwell directly points out that “imperialism is an evil thing.” However, by sharing his experiences in Burma, he is able to convey not only his own personal thoughts towards the matter, but the feelings of the subjects in Burma. His writing style is inclusive of many analogies that help incorporate many different levels to a seemingly simple object. The elephant itself can stand not only as a character, but represent innocence, British rule, and the power (of the British) over the Burmese people all at the same time, but on different analytical levels of the essay. This complex style helps the reader understand Imperialism from many different perspectives but also how it can affect a particular country, such as…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays