My research project question was “What are the top five best first person shooter franchises?”. The reason I chose this topic was more or less due to the fact that I do not have many interests outside of gaming, and because other ideas I had seemed far too inconsistent at providing results. I did not particularly want to do this topic, but time restraints and other issues made it the most suitable choice. The majority of my research was based around literature review, more specifically, analysing various reviews and articles about games. A survey was also conducted along with the analysis of several videos, however these played less of a role in the final outcome. The plan was to write the outcome as a script, which would later be used in a short video, but this option got out of hand, so the outcome was left as a script.
E1
The first process I used to gather information about the top five FPS franchises was literature review. I found this process to be the most effective method for gathering information, …show more content…
As my topic was ‘What are the top five First Person Shooter Franchises’, there was always going to be an aspect of limitation. This is because a topic like this is highly opinionated, which means there can never truly be a ‘right’ answer. However I saw this as a challenge and made sure that my answer was based on factual evidence as much as possible.
Things such as game features, quality of narrative, and overall popularity were things that were tangible as evidence. One issue that reduced the quality of the final outcome was the very limited word count I had to write about each game. As the outcome was written as a top five list, I needed to spend equal amount of time discussing each game, which reduced the amount of evidence I could include overall. Generally speaking though, I believe I did a good job at conveying my points for each
E1
The first process I used to gather information about the top five FPS franchises was literature review. I found this process to be the most effective method for gathering information, …show more content…
As my topic was ‘What are the top five First Person Shooter Franchises’, there was always going to be an aspect of limitation. This is because a topic like this is highly opinionated, which means there can never truly be a ‘right’ answer. However I saw this as a challenge and made sure that my answer was based on factual evidence as much as possible.
Things such as game features, quality of narrative, and overall popularity were things that were tangible as evidence. One issue that reduced the quality of the final outcome was the very limited word count I had to write about each game. As the outcome was written as a top five list, I needed to spend equal amount of time discussing each game, which reduced the amount of evidence I could include overall. Generally speaking though, I believe I did a good job at conveying my points for each