In the first place, by letting them go Holmes broke the law. He let the go without paying the price for their crime, which makes me think Holmes didn’t want them to pay their price to the Countess. He also thinks that Ryder’s guilt is punishment enough I don’t really think that it is… but what can I do back in 1890. In the second place, Ryder and Cusack framed
In the first place, by letting them go Holmes broke the law. He let the go without paying the price for their crime, which makes me think Holmes didn’t want them to pay their price to the Countess. He also thinks that Ryder’s guilt is punishment enough I don’t really think that it is… but what can I do back in 1890. In the second place, Ryder and Cusack framed